title: Clinical judgment and therapeutic decision making.
abstract: Clinical decision making is under increased scrutiny due to concerns about the cost and quality of medical care. Variability in physician decision making is common, in part because of deficiencies in the knowledge base, but also due to the difference in physicians' approaches to clinical problem solving. Evaluation of patient prognosis is a critical factor in the selection of therapy, and careful attention to methodology is essential to provide reliable information. Randomized controlled clinical trials provide the most solid basis for the establishment of broad therapeutic principles. Because randomized studies cannot be performed to address every question, observational studies will continue to play a complementary role in the evaluation of therapy. Randomized studies in progress, meta analyses of existing data, and increased use of administrative and collaborative clinical data bases will improve the knowledge base for decision making in the future.
authors: Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
authors: M A
authors: MA
authors: Hlatky
authors: R M
authors: RM
authors: Califf
authors: F E
authors: FE
authors: Harrell
authors: K L
authors: KL
authors: Lee
authors: D B
authors: DB
authors: Mark
authors: L H
authors: LH
authors: Muhlbaier
authors: D B
authors: DB
authors: Pryor
mesh_terms: D002309:Cardiology / Q000639:trends; D002318:Cardiovascular Diseases; D002985:Clinical Protocols; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D007256:Information Systems; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D011379:Prognosis; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D012107:Research Design