title: On choosing between movement sequences: comments on Rose (1988).
abstract: One method of investigating human motor programming is to determine how the choice reaction time for a memorized response sequence depends on the composition of that sequence as well as the other sequence that may be required. Using this method, Rose (1988) found that the total number of responses in the two possible response sequences predicts the choice reaction time to initiate either one. On the basis of this result, Rose claimed that the hierarchical editor (HED) model of motor programming, developed by Rosenbaum, Inhoff, and Gordon (1984), may have to be reevaluated. In this commentary I argue that Rose's results are inconsistent with a precursor of the HED model, not with the HED model itself, that the HED model actually provides a better fit to Rose's data than her total-number-of-responses model, that in general, choice reaction time does not increase with the total number of possible responses, and that structural relations between alternative movement sequences are the main determinants of choice reaction time. Taken as a whole, the results suggest that possible responses are not held in completely readied form before being selected for execution. A further implication is that the storage capacity of the motor output buffer (the MOB) is extremely limited.
authors: Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst 01003.
authors: D A
authors: DA
authors: Rosenbaum
mesh_terms: D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory; D011939:Mental Recall; D009048:Motor Skills; D011930:Reaction Time; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D012691:Serial Learning