Differences between C4A and C4B in the handling of immune complexes: the enhancement of CR1 binding is more important than the inhibition of immunoprecipitation.
There are two isotypes of C4--C4A and C4B--, encoded within the major histocompatibility complex with quite different properties. In this study we have compared purified C4A and C4B with regard to their ability to prevent immune complex precipitation and to enhance the binding of both preformed and nascent immune complexes to the receptor CR1 on red cells. C4A was modestly more effective than C4B at inhibiting immunoprecipitation, particularly in antibody excess. In the CR1 binding assay C4A was markedly more effective than C4B in enhancing binding to CR1. This difference was seen with both preformed and nascent immune complexes at equivalence and antibody excess. Thus the major differences between C4A and C4B in regard to immune complex handling is at the level of CR1 binding. Given the strong association of C4A* QO alleles with immune complex-mediated diseases like systemic lupus erythematosus, these findings have important pathogenetic implications.
Gatenby
P A
PA
Molecular Immunopathology Unit, MRC Centre, Cambridge, England.
Barbosa
J E
JE
Lachmann
P J
PJ
D000936:Antigen-Antibody Complex / Q000276:immunology*; D015934:Complement C4a / Q000276:immunology* / Q000378:metabolism; D015935:Complement C4b / Q000276:immunology* / Q000378:metabolism; D006801:Humans; D011233:Precipitin Tests; D011951:Receptors, Complement / Q000276:immunology* / Q000378:metabolism; D017463:Receptors, Complement 3b
D000936:Antigen-Antibody Complex; D011951:Receptors, Complement; D017463:Receptors, Complement 3b; D015934:Complement C4a; D015935:Complement C4b