On the relation between metacontrast masking and suppression of visible persistence.
Does the introduction of additional contours in a display sequence (an operation known to reduce the strength of suppression in metacontrast) also reduce suppression of visible persistence? In three experiments, duration of visible persistence was estimated by a method in which successful performance depends on the temporal integration of a pattern whose elements are displayed in two successive frames. In this procedure, the arrival of the trailing frame is known to exert a suppressive influence on the visible persistence of the leading frame. Embedding the elements of the leading frame within additional contours (a line grid) reduced the degree of suppression exerted by the trailing frame. This did not occur when the grid was part of the trailing display. We conclude that suppression of visible persistence and metacontrast masking belong to the same class of events.
Groner
Rudolf
R
0000-0003-4170-1148
U Bern.
Groner
Marina T
MT
Bischof
Walter F
WF
0000-0001-5508-0421
Di Lollo
Vincent
V
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D005260:Female; D005364:Field Dependence-Independence; D005366:Figural Aftereffect; D005556:Form Perception; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D011601:Psychophysics; D011930:Reaction Time