The Handicapped Children's Protection Act of 1986: time to pay the piper?
The Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA), Public Law 94-142, provides for a free, appropriate public education for handicapped children, as well as due process procedures. However, the EAHCA does not directly address relief available to parents who successfully allege inappropriate actions by school. In this article, we examine case law that has provided three primary types of relief (injunctive relief, tuition reimbursement, and attorneys' fees) in special education lawsuits. The Supreme Court's decision in Smith v. Robinson, (1984) which removed attorneys' fees for action under the EAHCA, is analyzed. The congressional reaction to Smith v. Robinson and the Handicapped Children's Protection Act of 1986, Public Law 99-372, is described, and case law relying on that act is examined.
Yell
M L
ML
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Espin
C A
CA
D002648:Child; D006233:Persons with Disabilities / Q000193:education; D004519:Education, Special / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005249:Fees and Charges; D006801:Humans; D014481:United States