Pathogenic and non-pathogenic zymodemes of Entamoeba histolytica in a rural area of Mexico. Concordance with serology.
OBJECTIVE
a) to describe the frequency of pathogenic and nonpathogenic zymodemes of E. histolytica in asymptomatic carriers in rural Mexico, b) to identify the isoenzymatic pattern of the zymodemes and c) to measure the concordance of pathogenic zymodemes and positive serology.


METHODS
Descriptive cross-sectional survey. Reference population: rural communities of the mexican highlands.


METHODS
2048 individuals from 341 families of 5 rural communities.


METHODS
From the local census of each community, 70 to 100 families were selected by random sampling. All members of each family were studied. After obtaining the consent the following activities were done: a) filling of a questionnaire about housing and sanitary condition and structure of the family; age, sex, literacy and digestive symptoms and illness during the previous 4 weeks, in each individual; b) a blood sample for serology (CEIP and IHA) and c) a stool sample for coproparasitoscopic analysis (CPS) and zymodemes identification, in each individual. Statistical evaluation was done by kappa index and receiving operating curves (ROC).


RESULTS
there were 122/1730 (7.1%) CPS studies positive to E histolytica cysts, 100/1730 (5.8%) zymodemes isolated and 137/1886 (7.3%) positive serologic studies. Of the 100 zymodemes 30 had a pathogenic pattern, three had a mixture (pathogenic/nonpathogenic) and 67 had a non-pathogenic patterns. There were two (XVII, XVIII) patterns described for the first time in Mexico. Concordance between pathogenic zymodemes and positive serology (IHA greater than 1:128) was very low, Kappa = 0.05. ROC curves for IHA in pathogenic and non-pathogenic zymodemes showed little relationship between positive serology and pathogenic pattern.


CONCLUSIONS
Although the frequency of positive serology, coproparasitoscopic studies and zymodemes identification was similar, the concordance between serology and the coprologic studies was very low. This disagrees with other reports, and deserves further investigation using methodologic standards in design.
Martínez-García
M C
MC
Unidad de Investigación Clínica en Enfermedades Infeccionas y Parasitarias, I.M.S.S. México, D.F.
Muñoz
O
O
Garduño-Rodríguez
G
G
Sánchez-Pares
M E
ME
Valadez-Salazar
A
A
Palacios-Beristain
O
O
Calderón-Segura
M
M
Isibasi-Araujo
A
A
Gutiérrez
G
G
D000818:Animals; D000913:Antibodies, Protozoan / Q000097:blood*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D010450:Endopeptidases / Q000032:analysis*; D004748:Entamoeba histolytica / Q000145:classification* / Q000201:enzymology / Q000276:immunology / Q000302:isolation & purification / Q000472:pathogenicity; D004749:Entamoebiasis / Q000097:blood / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000276:immunology / Q000469:parasitology; D005243:Feces / Q000469:parasitology; D006801:Humans; D007527:Isoenzymes / Q000032:analysis*; D008800:Mexico / Q000453:epidemiology; D015995:Prevalence; D015800:Protozoan Proteins / Q000032:analysis*; D012424:Rural Population; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014774:Virulence
D000913:Antibodies, Protozoan; D007527:Isoenzymes; D015800:Protozoan Proteins; D010450:Endopeptidases