[Linear versus circular polarization of head coils: comparison on phantoms and in the clinic].
Two different head coils--one with linear polarization and the other with circular polarization--were compared under the same measurement conditions. Comparison was done on a phantom with water-filled and gadolinium-filled pin-holes, as well as on anatomical MR images of 23 volunteers. In three volunteers the whole brain was examined while, in the remaining 20 volunteers the sella region or cerebellopontine angle region was examined. Criteria for comparison were signal-to-noise ratio, background noise, and detail resolution (phantom), as well as subjective criteria--image sharpness, anatomical, contrast, and recognition of anatomical details--, evaluated on anatomical MR images by four radiologists independently of each other. The results show a significant improvement of signal-to-noise ratio, lower background noise and therefore marked improvement of images sharpness, and moderate improvement in the recognition of anatomical details using the circular polarized head coil; as for as detail resolution and anatomical contrast were concerned, however, no significant difference was seen between the two coils. Major advantages of the circular, polarized head coil in clinical application are shorter measurement times (reduced number of acquisitions), as well as thinner slices without loss of signal-to-noise ratio.
Schratter
M
M
Zentrales Institut für Radiodiagnostik, Universität Wien.
Kramer
J
J
Prayer
L
L
Wimberger
D
D
Schmid
W
W
Imhof
H
H
D001921:Brain / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D002530:Cerebellopontine Angle / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D006257:Head; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000295:instrumentation*; D008961:Models, Structural; D012658:Sella Turcica / Q000033:anatomy & histology
Linear versus zirkular polarisierte Kopfspule--Vergleich am Phantom und in der Klinik.