Can reliance be placed on a single meta-analysis?
Meta-analysis replaced statistical significance with effect size in the hope of resolving controversy concerning evaluation of treatment effects. Statistical significance measured reliability of the effect of treatment, not its efficacy. It was strongly influenced by the number of subjects investigated. Effect size as assessed originally, eliminated this influence but by standardizing the size of the treatment effect could distort it. Meta-analyses which combine the results of studies which employ different subject types, outcome measures, treatment aims, no-treatment rather than placebo controls or therapists with varying experience can be misleading. To ensure discussion of these variables meta-analyses should be used as an aid rather than a substitute for literature review. While meta-analyses produce contradictory findings, it seems unwise to rely on the conclusions of an individual analysis. Their consistent finding that placebo treatments obtain markedly higher effect sizes than no treatment hopefully will render the use of untreated control groups obsolete.
McConaghy
N
N
Department of Psychiatry, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW.
D015982:Bias; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D006801:Humans; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000628:therapy; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D011613:Psychotherapy / Q000379:methods; D015203:Reproducibility of Results