title: [Alternating non-cross resistant multi-drug chemotherapy against malignant lymphoma (CAMBO-VIP)--consideration of the dose intensity].
abstract: Dose intensity defined as the amount of drug used per unit time, expressed as mg/m2/week, was reported to be a significant determinant of antitumor activity of single or combined drugs in cancer chemotherapy. We formulated a 12 week high dose intensity chemotherapy (CAMBO-VIP) for the treatment of advanced non Hodgkin's lymphoma with aggressive histology. The treatment consists of weekly alternate administration of myelosuppressive and non-myelosuppressive agents. Doxorubicin was administered every other week in combination with either cyclophosphamide, etoposide or ifosfamide. On the weeks in between, non-myelosuppressive vincristine was given with either methotrexate with leucovorin rescue or bleomycin. Prednisolone was given for the first and the last 4 weeks. Dose reduction and treatment delay were kept minimal for the purpose not lowering dose intensity. As of February 1990, 32 patients (pts), median age 52, entered the study, 29 of whom completed the treatment. There were 3 incomplete cases, in which 2 were due to interruption of the treatment at 5 and 6 weeks, respectively and 1 due to a half dose given because of the old age. CR was obtained in 29 pts (90.6%). Relapse occurred in 3 (10.4%) with the median follow-up of 12 months. Two year disease-free survival (DFS) was estimated to be 76.0% for all the patients and 83.9% for CR patients. Toxicity of CAMBO-VIP was moderate with no chemotherapeutic death. Myelosuppression was severe but of short duration, requiring virtually no dose reduction. Treatment delay was 3 days, median, and maximally 28 days. The average actual dose intensity calculated from given amount of drugs and treatment duration was as high as 90% of the protocol dose intensity. Dose intensity of CAMBO-VIP protocol is highest, equaling to that of MACOP-B, among representative series of reported lymphoma protocols. A highly significant correlation was observed between 9 drug relative dose intensity and DFS of the patients treated with each protocol. Significance of dose intensity as an independent prognostic factor, however, should be determined, by a prospective carefully designed stratified randomized studies.
authors.affiliation: Dept. of Medicine, Fujita Health University.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hirano
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Okamoto
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Maruyama
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Shinkai
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Miyazaki
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Ezaki
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000627:therapeutic use; D004334:Drug Administration Schedule; D004341:Drug Evaluation; D006801:Humans; D008228:Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000401:mortality; D008875:Middle Aged; D012074:Remission Induction; D015996:Survival Rate