Processing distinctions between stems and affixes: evidence from a non-fluent aphasic patient.
In this paper, we study the ability of a non-fluent aphasic patient, BN, to comprehend morphologically complex words when they appear in utterance contexts. We first establish that he is insensitive to the contextual appropriateness of both derived and inflected words. In a further experiment we show that he has no difficulty processing the stems of complex words and conclude that his problem is with the bound morphemes themselves. We then ask whether this problem is due to his inability to access either the phonological form of a morphologically complex word or its semantic and/or syntactic content. We find that only the access of semantic and syntactic content is impaired. We conclude from these six studies that: (a) BN presents a counter-example to the claim that non-fluent patients have particular difficulty with those aspects of morphology which have a syntactic function; (b) BN processes both derived and inflected words by mapping the sensory input onto the entire full-form of a complex word, but the semantic and syntactic content of the stem alone is accessed and integrated into the context. The semantic and syntactic implications of the suffix are never evaluated. This implies separate representation of the stems and suffixes of some types of morphologically complex words.
Tyler
L K
LK
University of Cambridge, U.K.
Behrens
S
S
Cobb
H
H
Marslen-Wilson
W
W
D000328:Adult; D001039:Aphasia, Broca / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D010700:Phonetics; D011930:Reaction Time; D012660:Semantics; D013067:Speech Perception