title: [Is an implant always necessary after enucleation?].
abstract: A retrospective study was performed on 114 patients who had received an intraorbital ball implant after removal of an eye: 44 had a primary implant inserted at the time of enucleation and 70 a secondary implant, inserted at a later date. We observed distinct advantages in the primary implantation group. Patients with a primary implant, an acrylic ball covered with sclera inserted within Tenon's capsule, had better cosmetic results and a lower complication rate and fewer needed any other therapeutic measures. Of the patients with primary implants 89% did not require further treatment, as against 51% with secondary implants.
authors: Orbita Zentrum, Akademisch Medisch Zentrum, University, Amsterdam.
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Smit
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Koornneef
mesh_terms: D015353:Eye Enucleation; D005137:Eye, Artificial; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology*; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D012189:Retrospective Studies
vernacular_title: Ist nach Enukleation immer ein Implantat notwendig?