title: Response by women aged 65-79 to invitation for screening for breast cancer by mammography: a pilot study.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine whether there is sufficient benefit to be gained by offering screening for breast cancer with mammography to women aged 65-79, who are not normally invited for screening.
  
  
  METHODS
  Pilot study of women eligible for screening but not for personal invitation. The results of this study were compared with the results of routinely screened younger women (aged 50-64) from the same general practice.
  
  
  METHODS
  One group general practice in south Manchester.
  
  
  METHODS
  The 631 women aged 65-79 on the practice list. A total of 42 (7%) were excluded by the general practitioner, and 22 (4%) invitation letters were returned by the post office.
  
  
  METHODS
  Response rates to invitation for screening assessed by three indices: crude population coverage ratio, crude invited population coverage ratio, and corrected invited population coverage ratio.
  
  
  RESULTS
  344 Patients aged 65-79 (61% of those invited, excluding those who could not be traced) were screened compared with 77% of women aged 50-64. The three response indices were higher for younger women than older: crude population coverage ratio = 66.5%, crude invited population coverage ratio = 69.3%, corrected invited population coverage ratio = 76.8% for women aged 50-64, compared with 54.5%, 58.4%, and 60.7% respectively for women aged 65-79. All four biopsies done in the older women gave positive results, giving a cancer detection rate of 11.6/1000 compared with 4.1/1000 among younger women.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These results show that there is a potential for high attendance at routine screening by older women if they are invited in the same way as younger women. If these results are found elsewhere the costs and benefits of screening older women should be reassessed.
authors: Regional Oncology Support Service, North West Regional Health Authority, Manchester.
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Hobbs
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Kay
authors: E H
authors: EH
authors: Friedman
authors: A S
authors: AS
authors: St Leger
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Lambert
authors: C R
authors: CR
authors: Boggis
authors: T M
authors: TM
authors: Howard
authors: A W
authors: AW
authors: Owen
authors: D L
authors: DL
authors: Asbury
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000523:psychology; D004739:England; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008327:Mammography / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010865:Pilot Projects