title: Clinical laboratory regulation under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988: can it be done?
abstract: This report examines logical but not yet widely recognized ramifications of the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA'88), federal legislation that will require certification of all laboratories examining human specimens. Examination of the CLIA'88 committee reports and committee hearings suggest that more than the conventional approach to laboratory standards will be needed to meet the public's expectations as articulated by our elected representatives. The conventional approach to clinical testing standards seeks to assure quality by regulating the laboratory analytical process. However, little empirical evidence is available to support or refute this model, which has been used during the past 25 years. One alternative paradigm for laboratory standards is an approach that examines the total laboratory testing process, including the selection, ordering, and interpretation of the test as well as the laboratory analysis per se. The history of controversy over laboratory standards--especially personnel standards, the glacial federal regulatory rulemaking process, public expectations of fail-safe technology, among other factors--suggests the implementation of CLIA'88 will be a lengthy and vigorously debated contest. The risk of a test is seldom inherent in the test itself, but rather is a function of the context in which the test is being used to provide information for medical decision making. Our premise is that diagnostic tests must be examined in the context of the laboratory testing situation. We suggest that now is the appropriate time for laboratory professionals, practicing physicians, and the public to abandon conventional thinking regarding clinical laboratory standards. We believe that CLIA'88 reflects a shift in public expectations toward fail-safe laboratory testing and the need for additional government oversight in laboratory test quality. If these new expectations persist, CLIA'88 represents a potential landmark in the course of federal authority and the practice of medicine in the United States.
authors: Graduate School of Public Health, College of Health and Human Services, San Diego State University, CA 92182-0405.
authors: K M
authors: KM
authors: Peddecord
authors: H C
authors: HC
authors: Hammond
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D007753:Laboratories / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards*; D007883:Legislation, Medical; D010824:Physicians' Offices / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011786:Quality Control; D014481:United States