title: Paraesthesia with lumbar epidural catheters. A comparison of air and saline in a loss-of-resistance technique.
abstract: The epidural space was located in 32 obstetric patients using loss of resistance to air, while in a further 35 saline was used. The incidence of paraesthesia was 56% in the air group and 57% in the saline group. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of other complications or in the quality of analgesia provided.
authors.affiliation: East Birmingham Hospital, Bordesley Green East.
authors.forename: M C
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Sarna
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: James
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000388:Air; D000767:Anesthesia, Epidural / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D000773:Anesthesia, Obstetrical / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D002406:Catheterization, Peripheral / Q000009:adverse effects; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010292:Paresthesia / Q000209:etiology*; D011247:Pregnancy; D012965:Sodium Chloride / Q000008:administration & dosage
chemical_list: D012965:Sodium Chloride