title: [How reliable is the monitoring for doping?].
abstract: The reliability of the dope control, of the chemical analysis of the urine probes in the accredited laboratories and their decisions, is discussed using probabilistic and statistical methods. Basically, we evaluated and estimated the positive predictive value which means the probability that an urine probe contains prohibited dope substances given a positive test decision. Since there are not statistical data and evidence for some important quantities in relation to the predictive value, an exact evaluation is not possible, only conservative, lower bounds can be given. We found that the predictive value is at least 90% or 95% with respect to the analysis and decision based on the A-probe only, and at least 99% with respect to both A- and B-probes. A more realistic observation, but without sufficient statistical confidence, points to the fact that the true predictive value is significantly larger than these lower estimates.
authors.affiliation: Institut für mathematische Statistik, Universität Bern.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hüsler
mesh_terms: D019411:Clinical Laboratory Techniques / Q000592:standards*; D004300:Doping in Sports; D006801:Humans; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013178:Sports Medicine / Q000379:methods*; D014556:Urine / Q000737:chemistry*
vernacular_title: Wie zuverlässig sind Dopingkontrollen?