Biomechanical analysis of pin placement and pin size for external fixation of distal radius fractures.
A series of biomechanical analyses were performed to explain the recent reduction in treatment-related complications of external fixation of distal radius fractures using a limited open approach for pin placement and larger 4-mm self-tapping half pins. A comparison of pull-out strength, stress concentration effect, and inherent bending strength of 3- and 4-mm half pins was performed. The effect of proximal pin placement in the radius or in the ulna and the effect of distal pin placement in four, six, or eight metacarpal cortices were determined. These analyses demonstrate that the 4-mm self-tapping half pins result in a significantly higher pull-out strength and only a small decrease in torsional load strength of the bone. They also demonstrate that proximal pin fixation in the radius produces the most stable fixation and that distal pin fixation into six metacarpal cortices produces a strong configuration that does not violate the interosseous muscles of the second intrinsic compartment. The rate of treatment-related complications in the external fixation of distal radius fractures (specifically, pin loosening, bending and breakage, fracture through pin sites, collapse at the fracture site, and intrinsic contracture) are addressed in this study. Such complications can be minimized by using 4-mm pins after central predrilling, with proximal placement in the radius and distal placement through six cortices of the bases of the second and third metacarpals.
Seitz
W H
WH
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mt. Sinai Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106.
Froimson
A I
AI
Brooks
D B
DB
Postak
P D
PD
Parker
R D
RD
LaPorte
J M
JM
Greenwald
A S
AS
D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D001858:Bone Nails; D004285:Dogs; D005592:Fracture Fixation / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation*; D006801:Humans; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D011885:Radius Fractures / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*