title: The role of conditioning and verbal expectancy in the placebo response.
abstract: Both conditioning and expectancy models have been offered in recent years as explanations for the placebo response. Following our earlier work on conditioning placebo responses in human subjects the current study examined the relative contribution made by conditioning and verbal expectancy. Group 1 received a Combined Expectancy and Conditioning Manipulation; group 2 received Expectancy Alone; group 3, Conditioning Alone; and group 4 was the control group. Subjects' responses were compared with and without a placebo cream, using iontophoretic pain stimulation. The results suggest that conditioning was more powerful than verbal expectancy in creating a placebo response.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Plenty Hospital, Mont Park, VictoriaAustralia Department of Psychology, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VictoriaAustralia.
authors.forename: Nicholas J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: Voudouris
authors.forename: Connie L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Peck
authors.forename: Grahame
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Coleman
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003213:Conditioning, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007478:Iontophoresis; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010146:Pain / Q000523:psychology*; D010919:Placebos; D012057:Reinforcement, Verbal
chemical_list: D010919:Placebos