title: A comparison of the noise sensitivity of nine QRS detection algorithms.
abstract: The noise sensitivities for nine different QRS detection algorithms were measured for a normal, single-channel lead II, synthesized ECG corrupted with five different types of synthesized noise. The noise types were electromyographic interference, 60 Hz powerline interference, baseline drift due to respiration, abrupt baseline shift, and a composite noise constructed from all of the other noise types. The percentage of QRS complexes detected, the number of false positives, and the detection delay were measured. None of the algorithms were able to detect all QRS complexes without any false positives for all of the noise types at the highest noise level. Algorithms based on amplitude and slope had the highest performance for EMG-corrupted ECG. An algorithm using a digital filter had the best performance for the composite noise corrupted data.
authors.affiliation: Auburn University, AL 36830.
authors.forename: G M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Friesen
authors.forename: T C
authors.initials: TC
authors.lastname: Jannett
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Jadallah
authors.forename: S L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Yates
authors.forename: S R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Quint
authors.forename: H T
authors.initials: HT
authors.lastname: Nagle
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004562:Electrocardiography; D008955:Models, Cardiovascular; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; D012984:Software