title: How invasive is TMJ double-contrast arthrography in combination with cinematography? Patient discomfort versus known diagnostic gain.
abstract: There is no doubt that double-contrast TMJ fluoroscopic tomography enables a differential diagnosis and treatment in internal derangement pathosis. Its indication is, apart from the expected diagnostic gain, also determined by the degree of its invasiveness, and other alternative diagnostics being available (nuclear magnetic resonance). Data on patient discomfort and complications were gathered in 63 arthrotomographies; pain sensations and mandibular mobility, during and after the procedure in particular, were studied. We consider, along with Westesson, the procedure to be less invasive than commonly considered, once the surgeon-radiologist has gained enough experience.
authors.affiliation: Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, University of Zürich/Switzerland.
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Engelke
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mommaerts
mesh_terms: D001175:Arthrography / Q000009:adverse effects*; D002358:Cartilage, Articular / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005471:Fluoroscopy / Q000009:adverse effects; D006801:Humans; D006987:Hypesthesia / Q000209:etiology; D004204:Joint Dislocations / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology; D009069:Movement Disorders / Q000209:etiology; D010146:Pain / Q000209:etiology; D010292:Paresthesia / Q000209:etiology; D013705:Temporomandibular Joint Disorders / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology; D014056:Tomography, X-Ray / Q000009:adverse effects; D014743:Videotape Recording