Free enterprise, professional ideology, and self-interest: an analysis of resistance by Canadian physicians to universal health insurance.
Under Canada's universal health care system, physicians are remunerated through government-run health insurance plans; a private market for physicians' services is virtually nonexistent. A proposal to ban the practice of extra-billing, whereby some physicians billed patients for amounts over and above insured rates, met with physicians' opposition. The particular constellation of legislative, social, and political events that followed the proposed ban presented a unique opportunity to explore the nature of the medical profession's resistance to encroachment on professional autonomy. The results of this survey of physicians in four specialties (N = 313) in metropolitan Toronto suggest that resistance to universal health insurance is complex; it involves a prevailing social ideology among physicians, which happens to be antiwelfare and conservative generally, entangled with economic self-interest and a specific set of beliefs about medical practice and physicians' rights and privileges.
Globerman
J
J
Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002170:Canada; D004465:Economic Competition; D004467:Economics; D006801:Humans; D009313:National Health Programs; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology*; D011209:Power, Psychological; D012051:Reimbursement Mechanisms / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence