Pathologist agreement in the interpretation of colorectal polyps.
Practicing physicians commonly perform flexible sigmoidoscopy in their offices. Polyploid lesions are frequently biopsied and sent to community hospitals for pathological interpretation. The pathologist's opinion often determines the course of medical follow-up for the patient, especially in cases in which early malignancy is suspected. This paper addresses the agreement of community-based pathologists regarding the interpretation of colorectal polyp pathology. Ten pathological slide sections were sent to 22 different community-based pathologists in southeast Michigan. These pathologists were asked to record their diagnosis of the specific histologies represented in each of the slides. The results indicated a high level of agreement of histologies in the dichotomous categories of hyperplasia versus adenoma. However, there was considerable disagreement on the presence of moderate or severe atypia. The results of this study indicate that clinicians performing biopsies on patients at risk for colorectal cancer should be aware of the potential for diagnostic variability among pathologists, and should plan follow-up strategies which may include seeking second pathological opinions when a significant patient management decision must be made.
Demers
R Y
RY
Department of Family Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan.
Neale
A V
AV
Budev
H
H
Schade
W J
WJ
D000236:Adenoma / Q000473:pathology; D003106:Colon / Q000473:pathology; D003111:Colonic Polyps / Q000473:pathology*; D006801:Humans; D006965:Hyperplasia; D010337:Pathology Department, Hospital / Q000592:standards; D011127:Polyps / Q000473:pathology*; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology*; D012007:Rectum / Q000473:pathology; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D012812:Sigmoidoscopy