title: Treatment decisions in "white coat" hypertension: do we need the whole 24 hours?
abstract: Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24BP) is an emerging technology used to further evaluate elevated blood pressure readings obtained during office visits. We wondered whether a less costly approach than 24BP would lead clinicians to similar treatment decisions. Eleven faculty general internists sequentially evaluated sample patients' office blood pressure readings, four intermittent blood pressures (IBP), and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure reports and made treatment decisions at each step. This yielded 187 "cases," in 173 of which the physicians were able to make treatment decisions. We found that addition of either IBP or 24BP to office readings did change treatment decisions (P less than .0001), but the changes brought about by IBP and 24BP were of statistically similar magnitude. We suggest that during clinical trials designed to evaluate the value of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in various clinical situations, simpler and perhaps less costly technology should be concurrently evaluated as an alternative.
authors.affiliation: Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, University of California Irvine Medical Center, Orange 92668.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Rucker
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Mabourakh
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Onishi
mesh_terms: D000553:Ambulatory Care / Q000379:methods; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001795:Blood Pressure Determination / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D006973:Hypertension / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy*; D008297:Male; D008991:Monitoring, Physiologic; D010819:Physician's Role; D015985:Precipitating Factors; D012380:Role; D013997:Time Factors