title: Frequency discrimination of complex tones with overlapping and non-overlapping harmonics.
abstract: These experiments address the following issues. (1) When two complex tones contain different harmonics, do the differences in timbre between them impair the ability to discriminate the pitches of the tones? (2) When two complex tones have only a single component in common, and that component is the most discriminable component in each tone, is the frequency discrimination of the component affected by differences in residue pitch between the two tones? (3) How good is the pitch discrimination of complex tones with no common components when each tone contains multiple harmonics, so as to avoid ambiguity of pitch? (4) Is the pitch discrimination of complex tones with common harmonics impaired by shifting the component frequencies to nonharmonic values? In all experiments, frequency difference limens (DLCs) were measured for multiple-component complex tones, using an adaptive two-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice task. Three highly trained subjects were used. The main conclusions are as follows. (1) When two tones have the first six harmonics in common, DLCs are larger when the upper harmonics are different than when the upper harmonics are in common or are absent. It appears that differences in timbre impair DLCs. (2) Discrimination of the frequency of a single common partial in two complex tones is worse when the two tones have different residue pitches than when they have the same residue pitch. (3) DLCs for complex tones with no common harmonics are generally larger than those for complex tones with common harmonics. For the former, large individual differences occur, probably because subjects are affected differently by differences in timbre. (4) DLCs for harmonic complex tones are smaller than DLCs for complex tones in which the components are mistuned from harmonic values. This can probably be attributed to the less distinct residue pitch of the inharmonic complexes, rather than to reduced discriminability of partials. Overall, the results support the idea that DLCs for complex tones with common harmonics depend on residue pitch comparisons, rather than on comparisons of the pitches of partials.
authors.affiliation: Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, England.
authors.forename: B C
authors.initials: BC
authors.lastname: Moore
authors.forename: B R
authors.initials: BR
authors.lastname: Glasberg
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D006801:Humans; D010897:Pitch Discrimination; D011571:Psychoacoustics