The case for reassessment of health care technology. Once is not enough.
Assessment of health care technologies should be an iterative process, not a single event. In the United States there are an increasing number of organized attempts at reassessment of technologies by the health industry, professional societies, and national government agencies, such as the Medical Necessity Project of Blue Cross/Blue Shield, the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Project of the American College of Physicians, and the work of the US Preventive Services Task Force. We examine four clinical practices--electronic fetal monitoring, episiotomy, electroencephalography, and hysterectomy--to illustrate the need to continuously reassess existing technologies and to challenge our current inertia in this critical arena of health practice.
Banta
H D
HD
The Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, The Hague.
Thacker
S B
SB
D026683:Advisory Committees; D001927:Brain Diseases; D004569:Electroencephalography / Q000592:standards; D004841:Episiotomy / Q000592:standards; D005260:Female; D005323:Fetal Monitoring / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy / Q000592:standards; D038622:Internationality; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D018570:Risk Assessment; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical; D014481:United States