Differential use of distance and location information for spatial localization.
Five experiments are reported in which subjects judged the movement or spatial location of a visible object that underwent a combination of real and induced (illusory) motion. When subjects attempted to reproduce the distance that the object moved by moving their unseen hands, they were more affected by the illusion than when they pointed to the object's perceived final location. Furthermore, pointing to the final location was more affected by the illusion when the hand movement began from the same position as that at which the object initially appeared, as compared with responses that began from other positions. The results suggest that people may separately encode two distinct types of spatial information: (1) information about the distance moved by an object and (2) information about the absolute spatial location of the object. Information about distance is more susceptible to the influence of an induced motion illusion, and people appear to rely differentially on the different types of spatial information, depending on features of the pointing response. The results have important implications for the mechanisms that underlie spatially oriented behavior in general.
Abrams
R A
RA
Department of Psychology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130.
Landgraf
J Z
JZ
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D004215:Distance Perception; D005556:Form Perception; D006801:Humans; D007088:Illusions; D007699:Kinesthesis; D009039:Motion Perception; D009903:Optical Illusions; D009949:Orientation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance