title: Right to refuse treatment: impact of Rivers v. Katz.
abstract: This article examines the impact of the New York court decision, Rivers v. Katz, which in June 1986 dramatically changed the state procedure for responding to involuntarily committed psychiatric patients who formally refused psychopharmacologic treatment. The court rejected the medically administered review process that had been used to respond to involuntarily committed psychiatric patients who formally refused medication, and replaced it with a judicial determination of competent and "substituted judgment" provided by the court. Post-Rivers, the rate of patients consistently refusing treatment decreased, and the time from refusal to resolution increased. The clinical, legal, and economic implications of the Rivers procedure are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, New York 14642.
authors.forename: J R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Ciccone
authors.forename: J F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Tokoli
authors.forename: C D
authors.initials: CD
authors.lastname: Clements
authors.forename: T E
authors.initials: TE
authors.lastname: Gift
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003134:Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D033222:Judicial Role; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000628:therapy*; D028642:Persons with Psychiatric Disorders; D008875:Middle Aged; D009518:New York; D010349:Patient Compliance; D018570:Risk Assessment