title: Rest and exercise hemodynamics of 20 to 23 mm allograft, Medtronic Intact (porcine), and St. Jude Medical valves in the aortic position.
abstract: Doppler echocardiography was used to measure gradients and valve areas at rest and after supine bicycle exercise in 35 patients with valve replacements 20 to 23 mm in size. Thirteen patients with a St. Jude Medical valve (St. Jude Medical, Inc., St. Paul, Minn.) were matched to 13 patients with an allograft valve, and seven patients with a Medtronic Intact (porcine) valve (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.) to seven patients with an allograft valve. Patients were matched for age, sex, valve size, body surface area, and left ventricular systolic function. There was no statistically significant difference between the matched groups for body surface areas, resting cardiac output, exercise heart rate, or workload achieved. Mean pressure gradient was higher for St. Jude Medical than for allograft groups, both at rest (11.8 +/- 6.67 mm Hg for St. Jude Medical versus 6.67 +/- 2.98 mm Hg for allografts) and after exercise (16.4 +/- 8.47 mm Hg versus 9.7 +/- 3.94 mm Hg), but the differences were of borderline significance (p = 0.016 and 0.027, respectively). Valve area at rest was similar for both devices (1.4 +/- 0.45 cm2 for St. Jude Medical versus 1.8 +/- 0.56 cm2 for allograft; p greater than 0.1). There were highly significant differences between patients with Intact and those with allograft valves for resting mean pressure gradient (19.3 +/- 4.23 mm Hg for Intact versus 5.9 +/- 3.68 mm Hg for allograft; p less than 0.001) and for exercise mean pressure gradient (27.8 +/- 8.63 mm Hg versus 8.1 +/- 8.43 mm Hg; p less than 0.001). The differences between the valve areas at rest also were significant (1.1 +/- 0.12 cm2 versus 2.2 +/- 0.62 cm2; p less than 0.01). It is concluded that when a tissue valve is indicated in patients with a small aortic root, the freehand allograft aortic valve is an ideal device from the hemodynamic perspective and is superior to the Intact valve. It is also probably superior in this respect to the St. Jude Medical valve, although the analysis may be biased slightly in favor of the allograft valve.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiology, Green Lane Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
authors.forename: W M
authors.initials: WM
authors.lastname: Jaffe
authors.forename: H A
authors.initials: HA
authors.lastname: Coverdale
authors.forename: A H
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Roche
authors.forename: R M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Whitlock
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Neutze
authors.forename: B G
authors.initials: BG
authors.lastname: Barratt-Boyes
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001021:Aortic Valve / Q000637:transplantation*; D001705:Bioprosthesis; D001830:Body Surface Area; D015150:Echocardiography, Doppler; D015444:Exercise / Q000502:physiology*; D005080:Exercise Test; D005260:Female; D006350:Heart Valve Prosthesis; D006439:Hemodynamics / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D014184:Transplantation, Homologous