title: In defence of discovery learning.
abstract: The present paper discusses the influence of different training methods--i.e., knowledge of results, preferred frequency, and the availability of a model--on the learning of a complex motor skill, in this case the learning of slalom ski-type movements on a ski-simulator. Results of three experiments performed on this apparatus showed that, although the training methods used influence the course of learning, none of the methods used was actually superior to discovery learning. It is suggested that discovery learning forces the learner to explore the dynamics of the system in which he or she operates, in an iterative way. Possibilities for cooperative working between prescription and discovery learning are discussed.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Department of Psychology, Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Vereijken
authors.forename: H T
authors.initials: HT
authors.lastname: Whiting
mesh_terms: D005246:Feedback; D006801:Humans; D007100:Imitative Behavior; D007721:Knowledge of Results, Psychological; D007858:Learning; D009048:Motor Skills; D009068:Movement; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D012865:Skiing