title: Management of rectal injuries. Dogma versus practice.
abstract: The current treatment of civilian rectal injuries stems from military practice. Five principles have evolved: 1) complete fecal diversion, 2) debridement and closure, 3) rectal stump irrigation, 4) presacral drainage, and 5) broad spectrum antibiotics. To assess our practice results, the records of 52 consecutive patients with rectal injury seen at Detroit Receiving Hospital from 1980-88 were reviewed. Etiologies were gunshot (40), shotgun (9), anal assault (2), and stab (1). There were no blunt injuries and no deaths. Treatment consisted of celiotomy (52), diverting colostomy (51), presacral drains (35), rectal stump irrigation (26), and primary closure (1). Broad spectrum antibiotics were administered in all patients. Despite lack of universal application of the "standard" principles, only five patients had postoperative complications and none were related to the rectal injury. Our results demonstrate that a single approach may not be justified, as excellent outcome was achieved with low morbidity and no mortality despite selective management. The universal application of colostomy, repair, irrigation, drainage, and antibiotics cannot be supported.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Detroit Receiving Hospital, Michigan.
authors.forename: D D
authors.initials: DD
authors.lastname: Thomas
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Levison
authors.forename: B J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Dykstra
authors.forename: J S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Bender
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003646:Debridement; D004322:Drainage; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012007:Rectum / Q000293:injuries* / Q000601:surgery; D007507:Therapeutic Irrigation