[Complications of central venous catheterization from an anatomical point of view].
For access to the central venous system numerous percutaneous methods and approaches exist. Questions are often raised concerning which approach is the safest. In 18 human cadavers, we punctured the internal jugular vein via an anterior and posterior approach and the subclavian vein via an infraclavicular route to determine which of these approaches is better with respect to success rate and frequency of puncture complications. The position of the needles was assessed by dissection. Successful venipunctures were achieved in 81% by the posterior approach, as opposed to 58% by the anterior approach and the infraclavicular route. The lowest frequency of complications was attained by the posterior approach (17%) too, whereas the anterior approach (33%) and the subclavian route (25%) had higher complication rates. The main complication of posterior and anterior approaches was inadvertent arterial puncture (9 vs. 19%). At the subclavian approach puncture of a 'wrong' vein was frequent (14%), and the complications included a case of pleura lesion. In conclusion the posterior approach to the internal jugular vein is superior to the other investigated approaches, and therefore, it can reasonably be proposed as a usual route for the insertion of a central venous catheter.
Stern
W
W
Anatomisches Institut, Universität Tübingen, BRD.
Sauer
W
W
Dauber
W
W
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001815:Bloodletting; D002405:Catheterization, Central Venous / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D004210:Dissection; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007601:Jugular Veins / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D013350:Subclavian Vein / Q000033:anatomy & histology
Punktionskomplikationen zentralvenöser Katheter aus anatomischer Sicht.