The effect of image processing on chest radiograph interpretations in a PACS environment.
The question of whether image processing affects a radiologist's diagnostic performance is becoming more important as the digital modalities proliferate. In the multi-observer study reported, the performance of radiologists who interpret a series of posteroanterior digitized chest images displayed on a high-resolution workstation, with and without a set of image processing options, is determined. These include brightness, contrast, reverse look-up tables (black-bone), and two edge enhancement options. Three hundred images were evaluated twice (once in each mode) by each of seven board-certified radiologists, who recorded their confidence ratings for the presence or absence of one or more of the following abnormalities: interstitial disease, nodule, and pneumothorax. The original, unprocessed digital image was available for reference for those sessions in which the processing options were available. With the exception of one reader, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the two modes (with and without processing) for the detection of any of the different abnormalities by individual readers. Likewise, the group as a whole showed no significant difference (P less than .05) for detection of any of the three abnormalities between the two reading modes.
Rosenthal
M S
MS
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261.
Good
W F
WF
Costa-Greco
M A
MA
Miketic
L M
LM
Eeelkema
E A
EA
Gur
D
D
Rockette
H E
HE
D006751:Hospital Information Systems; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D015588:Observer Variation; D012372:ROC Curve; D013902:Radiography, Thoracic; D011873:Radiology Information Systems; D014796:Visual Perception