Comparative classification of aphasic disorders.
This study compares aphasia classification of 20 aphasics who were evaluated with the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) and the Lisbon Aphasia Examination Battery (LAEB). High correlations were found between tests evaluating the same functions in both batteries. Aphasia types derived from these two batteries showed only a partial overlap. This was due to the use of different numerical diagnostic criteria. When these criteria were used to specify aphasia types of 179 acute and 113 chronic aphasics grouped by cluster analysis, similar discrepancies were noted. Two major differences were found: some LAEB global aphasics turned out to be WAB Broca's and some LAEB anomics were classified as WAB conduction aphasics. These disagreements reflect difficulties in delimiting Broca's and conduction aphasia. The importance of the numerical approach to aphasia classification is stressed, as it is a reliable method to classify aphasic patients in order to allow comparison of data from different centers.
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000849:Anomia / Q000145:classification; D001037:Aphasia / Q000145:classification* / Q000175:diagnosis; D001039:Aphasia, Broca / Q000145:classification; D001041:Aphasia, Wernicke / Q000145:classification; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests