An analysis of peripheral motor nerve stimulation in humans using the magnetic coil.
We compared conventional electrical and magnetic coil (MC) stimulation of distal median nerve in 10 normal subjects and 1 patient. Orthogonal (90 degrees to volar forearm)-longitudinal (the plane of the MC aligned with the long axis of nerve or wire), tilted (to 45 degrees) longitudinal, and tangential edge orientations elicited maximal or near maximal compound motor axon potentials (CMAPs) without simultaneous co-activation of ulnar nerve. Transverse and symmetrical tangential orientations were inefficient. A simulation study of an ideal volume conductor confirmed these findings by predicting that the maximum current density was near the outer edge of the MC and not at the center where the magnetic flux intensity is maximal. An orthogonal-longitudinal MC induces a current in the adjacent volume conductor (for example elbow or wrist), which flows in the same circular direction as in the MC. This differs from a tangentially orientated MC which classically elicits current flow in the volume conductor opposite in circular direction to that in the MC. Amplitude and latency of the CMAP were both altered, but not identically, by changing the intensity of MC and cathodal stimuli. Rotating an orthogonal-longitudinal MC through 180 degrees, thus reversing the direction of current flow, elicited single fiber muscle action potentials whose peak latencies differed at most by 100 microseconds. Thus, the (virtual) cathode and anode are significantly closer (i.e., 5-6 mm) with MC than with electrical stimulation where they are at least 20 mm apart. A disadvantage of MC stimulation is the imprecision in defining exactly where the distally propagating nerve impulse originates. In different subjects, using maximum output and orthogonal or tilted (to 45 degrees) longitudinal orientations, the calculated site of excitation in the median nerve varied 2-15 mm distal to the midpoint of the contacting edge of the MC. This limits the usefulness of the MC in its current configuration for determining distal motor latencies. Future advances in MC design may overcome these difficulties.
Maccabee
P J
PJ
Department of Neurology, State University of New York Health Science Center, Brooklyn 11203.
Amassian
V E
VE
Cracco
R Q
RQ
Cadwell
J A
JA
D000200:Action Potentials; D000328:Adult; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008280:Magnetics; D008297:Male; D008475:Median Nerve / Q000502:physiology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D011930:Reaction Time; D014459:Ulnar Nerve / Q000502:physiology