A comparison of platinized grooved electrode performance with ring-tip electrodes.
One of the determinants of the capture threshold of an endocardial pacing lead is the configuration of the electrode tip. To evaluate whether micro- and macroporous electrodes have better initial and chronic thresholds than nonporous electrodes, acute and chronic capture thresholds, stimulation impedance and sensing thresholds were determined in 22 patients in whom a ventricular ring-tip electrode and a unipolar, dual chamber pacemaker with bidirectional telemetry had been implanted. These values were compared to those obtained from 25 patients receiving an electrode constructed with a platinized groove surface at the time of implant of an identical pulse generator. The ventricular capture threshold at implant was 0.7 V +/- 0.3 at 0.6 msec pulse width for both groups. The capture threshold was significantly greater in the ring tip electrode group at follow-up periods of 1 month (1.1 V +/- 0.5 vs 1.6 V +/- 0.6, P less than 0.008), 4 months (1.0 V +/- 0.2 vs 1.7 V +/- 0.8, P less than 0.002), and 10 months (1.2 V +/- 0.4 vs 1.7 V +/- 0.5, P less than 0.04) following implantation. The stimulation impedance at the time of implantation was lower in the ring-tip electrode group (530 ohms vs 603 ohms, P less than 0.03), but thereafter no significant difference was seen between the two groups. The acute and chronic sensing thresholds were similar in both groups. While the microporous electrode had significantly lower chronic capture thresholds, the magnitude of this difference is small, and probably clinically inconsequential.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Midei
M G
MG
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Jones
B R
BR
Brinker
J A
JA
D000368:Aged; D004567:Electrodes, Implanted / Q000592:standards*; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010138:Pacemaker, Artificial; D010984:Platinum; D013997:Time Factors
D010984:Platinum