Visual detection of microencapsulated insecticides with selective staining and scanning electron microscopy.
Selective staining with Sudan IV and methylene blue for light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were investigated to determine their potential for detecting and quantifying microencapsulated insecticides. Penncap-M (microencapsulated methyl parathion), Penncapthrin (microencapsulated permethrin), and Dyfonate (microencapsulated fonofos) were selectively stained with Sudan IV but not with methylene blue. Selective staining was not possible for Altosid SF-10 or SR-20 (microencapsulated methoprene) with either stain. Sudan IV enabled detection of some microencapsulated formulations in the digestive content of selected aquatic invertebrates and prepared contaminated pollen samples. Staining intensity with Sudan IV was greatest with acetone but capsular damage was high. A solvent ratio of 50:50 and 20:80 acetone/xylene minimized capsular collapse and maintained good staining intensity. The use of SEM for capsule identification and quantification depended upon the method of sample preparation: the slide smear method was superior to samples prepared by incision or microtomy. SEM was most suitable for investigation of formulations such as methoprene, for which selective staining was not possible. The chemical basis of staining with Sudan IV and potential application of both identification techniques are discussed.
Sibley
P K
PK
Fortin
C
C
D000330:Aedes / Q000032:analysis; D000818:Animals; D002214:Capsules; D003465:Culex / Q000032:analysis; D003621:Daphnia / Q000032:analysis; D007306:Insecticides / Q000032:analysis*; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D010573:Pesticide Residues / Q000032:analysis*; D012843:Simuliidae / Q000032:analysis; D013194:Staining and Labeling
D002214:Capsules; D007306:Insecticides; D010573:Pesticide Residues