Three example applications of optimization techniques to Department of Energy contractor radiation protection programs.
Six numerical examples of optimization of radiation protection are provided in the appendices of International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication No. 37 (1983). In each case, the calculations were based on well-defined parameters and assumptions. In this paper, we examined three different numerical examples that were based on empirical data and less-certain assumptions. In the first example, the optimum sampling frequency for a typical 3H bioassay program was found to be once every 2 mo. However, this result depended on assumed values for several variables that were difficult to evaluate. The second example showed that the optimum frequency for recalibrating a group of "cutie pie" (CP) ionization chamber survey instruments was once every 85 d. This result depended largely on the assumption that an improperly operating CP instrument could lead to a serious overexposure. In the third example, one continuous air monitor (CAM) was determined to be the optimum number in a workplace at a Department of Energy (DOE) Pu facility. The optimum location of the CAM was determined from past glove-box release studies. These examples demonstrated that cost-benefit analysis of individual elements of radiation protection programs can be useful even if limited data are available.
Merwin
S E
SE
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA 99352.
Martin
J B
JB
Tawil
J J
JJ
Selby
J M
JM
D000398:Air Pollution, Radioactive / Q000032:analysis; D001681:Biological Assay; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006077:Government Agencies; D006801:Humans; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000517:prevention & control; D011834:Radiation Monitoring / Q000379:methods; D011835:Radiation Protection / Q000379:methods*