title: Responses by general practitioners in Avon to proposals for general practice in the white paper Working for Patients.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the views of Avon's general practitioners about the general practice proposals within the government's white paper Working for Patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  Postal questionnaire survey.
  
  
  METHODS
  A county in south west England.
  
  
  METHODS
  All general practitioner principals (n = 537) under contract with Avon Family Practitioner Committee.
  
  
  RESULTS
  492 doctors (92%) responded to the survey. More than three quarters of the respondents were opposed to the government's proposals on budgets for specific surgical procedures, prescribing, and diagnostic tests; and between 63% and 93% felt negative about advantages that might accrue from the proposals. Over three quarters of general practitioners were in favour of family practitioner committees monitoring work load, prescribing, and referrals. General practitioners in large, potentially budget holding practices held similar views to doctors in smaller practices.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Avon's general practitioners substantially reject most of the government's proposals about general practice in the white paper Working for Patients.
authors.affiliation: Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Bristol.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Whitfield
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Wood
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Wright
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001294:Attitude to Health; D002017:Budgets; D004739:England; D005194:Family Practice / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006285:Health Planning; D006801:Humans; D010821:Physicians, Family / Q000523:psychology*; D013222:State Medicine / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000639:trends