title: In situ or retrograde manipulation of ureteral stones: still a controversy?
abstract: A series of 365 patients with ureteral stones is reviewed. ESWL, ureterorenoscopy, basket extraction and open surgery were alternatively used according to the stone and to the increasing experience in minimally invasive techniques. The overall success rate of in situ ESWL varied between 79 and 90% according to the localization of the stone and no difference was noted between patients treated with the original HM III Dornier lithotriptor and patients treated with the upgraded HM III with low pressure and large ellipsoid for painfree ESWL. Also the retreatment rate did not differ significantly (38 vs 42%). Ureterorenoscopy, carried out as first approach or after ESWL failure, was successful in 80.4% of the cases. Basket extraction was successful only in 32.3% of the cases. In situ ESWL, in one or two sessions, without anaesthesia and without hospital stay, is a good solution for roughly 80% of ureteral stones. Retrograde manipulation with or without ureterorenoscopy, requiring anaesthesia and hospitalization, should be reserved to failures of in situ ESWL.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Puppo
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Bottino
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Germinale
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Caviglia
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Ricciotti
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Giuliani
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002648:Child; D004724:Endoscopy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008096:Lithotripsy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D014514:Ureteral Calculi / Q000628:therapy*