title: Panendoscopy: a valuable procedure?
abstract: The significance of panendoscopy, performed as part of the routine diagnostic procedure, must be questioned when the incidence of synchronous primary tumors found by this procedure is only 1% to 2%, as in patients with head and neck cancer in the Dutch population. In order to detect a group of patients with a higher probability of secondary tumors, patients were selected for panendoscopy on the following criteria: localization and histology of the index tumors, as well as on smoking and drinking habits. In spite of this selection, the yield of panendoscopy was still below 2%. Until other criteria for the selection of a subset of patients with a high incidence of synchronous tumours are found, the indication for panendoscopy as part of a routine diagnostic procedure has to be constantly questioned, and panendoscopy should therefore be performed only when this procedure is part of a prospective study.
authors.affiliation: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: G J
authors.initials: GJ
authors.lastname: Hordijk
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Bruggink
authors.forename: L A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Ravasz
mesh_terms: D000428:Alcohol Drinking; D002294:Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D004724:Endoscopy / Q000379:methods; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006258:Head and Neck Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D006801:Humans; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D009378:Neoplasms, Multiple Primary / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D009426:Netherlands; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012907:Smoking