[Cefotetan vs ceftriaxone: clinical and bacteriological efficacy in complicated forms of urinary tract infection].
Forty adult patients with UTI complicated by local and/or general diseases have been treated, 20 with Cefotetan and 20 with Ceftriaxone. Both treatments showed good clinical and bacteriological efficacy, with no statistically significant differences between the results. Cefotetan and Ceftriaxone were both well tolerated, without any local or systemic side effects.
D'Amato
C
C
De Carli
G
G
Leoni
G C
GC
Bordi
E
E
Carvelli
C
C
Colaiacomo
M
M
Struglia
C
C
Visco
G
G
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001419:Bacteria / Q000187:drug effects / Q000302:isolation & purification; D015313:Cefotetan / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D002443:Ceftriaxone / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D004341:Drug Evaluation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D014552:Urinary Tract Infections / Q000150:complications / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000382:microbiology
D015313:Cefotetan; D002443:Ceftriaxone
Cefotetan vs ceftriaxone: efficacia clinica e batteriologica nelle forme complicate di infezione del tratto urinario.