Criteria for identifying and listing substances known to cause developmental toxicity under California's Proposition 65.
Because of the automatic restrictions and warning requirements imposed on substances identified by the state as "known to cause developmental toxicity," the Expert Committee recommends the use of criteria that emphasize human relevancy, biological plausibility, and evidence in support of a selective, adverse developmental effect at non-maternally-toxic doses. In many instances, data for substances of public concern will be insufficient at present to meet these criteria. The fact that a substance is not listed as "known to cause developmental toxicity" does not create a presumption that the substance is safe. The Expert Committee, therefore, urges that these substances be recommended for further testing and that high priority be given to conducting the necessary tests. The Expert Committee reiterates its concern that substances listed by the SAP be identified according to the toxic endpoints (cancer, male reproductive toxicity, female reproductive toxicity, and/or developmental toxicity) that led to listing. Further, the Expert Committee recommends that the state Health and Welfare Agency institute education programs emphasizing appropriate courses of action for citizens informed of exposures to substances known to the state to cause cancer, birth defects, or reproductive toxicity.
Mattison
D R
DR
Division of Human Risk Assessment, National Center for Toxicological Research, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079.
Hanson
J W
JW
Kochhar
D M
DM
Rao
K S
KS
D000818:Animals; D002140:California; D002273:Carcinogens / Q000633:toxicity; D006256:Hazardous Waste / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007883:Legislation, Medical / Q000639:trends*; D013723:Teratogens / Q000633:toxicity*
D002273:Carcinogens; D006256:Hazardous Waste; D013723:Teratogens