[Comparative studies on fissure sealing: composite versus Cermet cement].
Fifty two molars sealed with either composite or Cermet cement were compared. The composite sealant was applied after enamel etching using a rubber dam. Before sealing with Cermet cement the enamel was only cleaned with pumice powder and sodium hypochlorie and the material was applied without enamel etching. After an average follow-up of 1.6 years composite sealants proved to be significantly more reliable. Cermet cement sealings showed defects more frequently.
Hickel
R
R
Voss
A
A
D016722:Cermet Cements; D003188:Composite Resins; D003722:Dental Alloys; D003738:Dental Cements; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D006801:Humans; D010895:Pit and Fissure Sealants; D012834:Silver
D016722:Cermet Cements; D003188:Composite Resins; D003722:Dental Alloys; D003738:Dental Cements; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D010895:Pit and Fissure Sealants; D012834:Silver
Vergleichende Untersuchung über Fissurenversiegelung: Komposit versus Cermet-Zement.