title: Using severity information for quality assessment: a review of three cases by five severity measures.
abstract: Five severity measurement systems--APACHE II, Computerized Severity Index, Disease Staging (both Q-Scale and clinical criteria version), MedisGroups, and Patient Management Categories--were applied to three clinical cases. Severity results and recommendations for quality review were then compared and contrasted. Systems that define severity based on resource need produce different impressions than those that define severity in more clinical terms. In-depth quality review is generally suggested when severity scores later in the hospital stay are higher than at admission. Recommendations for review may be automatic or tied to other factors. Some systems use normative data, based on observed severity patterns and patient outcomes, to guide decisions about quality reviews.
authors.affiliation: Boston University School of Medicine, Massachusetts.
authors.forename: L I
authors.initials: LI
authors.lastname: Iezzoni
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007256:Information Systems; D008297:Male; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D014600:Utilization Review