Computed tomography versus single-contrast arthrotomography in evaluation of the temporomandibular joint disc. A study of autopsy specimens.
The lateral, central and medial parts of 15 right temporomandibular joint autopsy specimens were studied to compare the ability of computed tomography (CT) and single-contrast arthrotomography in diagnosing the disc position and configuration. The radiologic findings were compared with macroscopic findings in a blinded fashion. In the CT examination, the diagnostic accuracy was 40% in determining the disc position and 26.7% in determining the disc configuration. However, in many areas of the joints the disc was not possible to evaluate by CT. With arthrotomography the diagnostic accuracy in determining the disc position was 75.6% and the disc configuration 60%. The sensitivity of CT was 0.45 and of arthrotomography 0.95 for the diagnosis of the disc position. The specificity was 0.87 for CT and 0.76 for arthrotomography. From these results, we conclude that arthrotomography is a reliable aid to diagnosis of TMJ disc changes and that CT cannot replace it.
Tanimoto
K
K
Department of Oral Radiology, Hiroshima University School of Dentistry, Japan.
Hansson
L G
LG
Petersson
A
A
Rohlin
M
M
Johansen
C C
CC
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001175:Arthrography / Q000379:methods*; D002358:Cartilage, Articular / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology; D003287:Contrast Media; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013704:Temporomandibular Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods
D003287:Contrast Media