Experience in managing a large-scale rescreening of Papanicolaou smears and the pros and cons of measuring proficiency with visual and written examinations.
Experiences in a large-scale interlaboratory rescreening of Papanicolaou smears are detailed, and the pros and cons of measuring proficiency in cytology are discussed. Despite the additional work of the rescreening project and some psychological and technical problems, it proved to be a useful measure of the laboratory's performance as a whole. One problem to be avoided in future similar studies is the creation of too many diagnostic categories. Individual testing and certification have been shown to be accurate predictors of proficiency. For cytology, such tests require a strong visual component to test interpretation and judgment skills, such as by the use of glass slides or photomicrographs. The potential of interactive videodisc technology for facilitating cytopathologic teaching and assessment is discussed.
Rube
I F
IF
Department of Pathology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Memphis.
D002487:Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.; D003581:Cytodiagnosis / Q000193:education / Q000592:standards; D004521:Educational Measurement / Q000379:methods; D004650:Employee Performance Appraisal / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007753:Laboratories / Q000592:standards; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000592:standards*; D065006:Papanicolaou Test; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D013714:Tennessee; D014481:United States; D014626:Vaginal Smears / Q000592:standards*; D014742:Videodisc Recording; D000078329:Workforce