Interpreting feline leukemia test results.
Routine prevaccinal screening for FeLV has inherent statistical limitations owing to the magnification of false-positive test errors by the low prevalence of FeLV viremia in the general cat population. Positive ELISA test results obtained in a screening program should be interpreted with caution, because a high proportion--approximately 72%--of such are likely to be false-positive results. On the other hand, routine screening is an excellent method for ruling out FeLV viremia, because a false-negative result is likely to be obtained in only 1/1,000 tests.
Romatowski
J
J
D000818:Animals; D000956:Antigens, Viral / Q000032:analysis*; D002371:Cat Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis*; D002415:Cats; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D004797:Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D007938:Leukemia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000662:veterinary*; D005256:Leukemia Virus, Feline / Q000276:immunology*; D008433:Mathematics; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011933:Reagent Kits, Diagnostic; D014766:Viremia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000662:veterinary
D000956:Antigens, Viral; D011933:Reagent Kits, Diagnostic