Working for which patients and at what cost?
The Government's white-paper Working for Patients proposes introducing a system in which publicly financed resources for hospital and community health services will be distributed to districts and general practitioners with practice budgets for them to choose between competing providers from both the public and private sectors. The NHS Management Board in 1986 observed that such a system would be costly and impractical and would require careful pilot work in situations where its benefits are likely to outweight its costs. This paper shows that there is no reason for changing that judgement.
Bevan
G
G
Department of Community Medicine, United Medical School of Guys Hospital, London.
Holland
W
W
Mays
N
N
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001071:Appointments and Schedules; D002017:Budgets / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D002204:Capitation Fee / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D004465:Economic Competition; D004469:Economics, Hospital; D004630:Emergencies; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005194:Family Practice / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006295:Health Resources / Q000191:economics; D006296:Health Services / Q000191:economics; D006801:Humans; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000458:organization & administration*; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000639:trends; D006113:United Kingdom; D014850:Waiting Lists