title: CAPD versus hemodialysis (HD): 7 years of experience.
abstract: The purpose of this work is to compare survival and drop-out in 2 groups of patients undergoing either CAPD (42 pts) or standard HD (48 pts) as first treatment, from November 1981 to December 1988. Mean age and number of risk factors were not significantly different. At the end of the study 50.0% of pts on CAPD and 37.5% on HD were still on first treatment; clinical problems were the most frequent cause of drop-out. The total period of observation was significantly higher in the CAPD group (1391.0 months vs 850.4), but the life table analysis showed no significant differences in the incidence of death and of drop-out in the two groups. The follow-up of the CAPD group was subdivided into two periods, due to the fact that a scheme for clinical and social survey of patients undergoing dialysis and a policy of more frequent home visits were introduced at the end of 1985. A significant decrease of peritonitis episodes was observed in the second period.
authors.affiliation: Servizio Nefrologia e Dialisi, Osp. S. Lazzaro, Alba.
authors.forename: P L
authors.initials: PL
authors.lastname: Cavalli
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Viglino
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Goia
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Cottino
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Mariano
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Gandolfo
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007676:Kidney Failure, Chronic / Q000209:etiology / Q000401:mortality* / Q000628:therapy; D015993:Life Tables; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010352:Patient Dropouts; D010531:Peritoneal Dialysis, Continuous Ambulatory / Q000009:adverse effects; D010538:Peritonitis / Q000209:etiology; D006435:Renal Dialysis; D012307:Risk Factors; D015996:Survival Rate