title: Carotid endarterectomy in community practice: surgeon-specific versus institutional results.
abstract: The efficacy of carotid endarterectomy in preventing stroke is clearly related to appropriate patient selection and low surgical morbidity and mortality. It has been suggested that since results at some centers are better than nationwide statistics, perhaps the operation should be limited to those institutions. In this paper we present an experience with carotid endarterectomy over the past twelve years. These 566 consecutive cases were performed by two vascular surgeons in a large metropolitan area using thirteen different hospitals ranging from 150 to 500 beds. Our mortality of 0.5% and permanent stroke incidence of 1.6% did not vary significantly from hospital to hospital. Where the results of surgical audits were available from the individual hospitals, the overall complication rates were significantly higher. We conclude that individual surgeons, not institutions, determine the efficacy of carotid endarterectomy in community practice.
authors.forename: B F
authors.initials: BF
authors.lastname: Gibbs
authors.forename: V J
authors.initials: VJ
authors.lastname: Guzzetta
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002339:Carotid Arteries / Q000601:surgery*; D002561:Cerebrovascular Disorders / Q000209:etiology; D004691:Endarterectomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000401:mortality / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D006748:Hospital Departments / Q000592:standards*; D006764:Hospitals, Community / Q000592:standards; D006786:Hospitals, Urban / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008485:Medical Audit; D008875:Middle Aged; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013503:Surgery Department, Hospital / Q000592:standards*; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical