Circular vection as a function of the relative sizes, distances, and positions of two competing visual displays.
In studies where it is reported that illusory self-rotation (circular vection) is induced more by peripheral displays than by central displays, eccentricity may have been confounded with perceived relative distance and area. Experiments are reported in which the direction and magnitude of vection induced by a central display in the presence of a surround display were measured. The displays varied in relative distance and area and were presented in isolation, with one moving and one stationary display, or with both moving in opposite directions. A more distant display had more influence over vection than a near display. A central display induced vection if seen in isolation or through a 'window' in a stationary surrounding display. Motion of a more distant central display weakened vection induced by a nearer surrounding display moving the other way. When the two displays had the same area their effects almost cancelled. A moving central display nearer than a textured stationary surround produced vection in the same direction as the moving stimulus. This phenomenon is termed 'contrast-motion vecton' because it is probably due to illusory motion of the surround induced by motion of the centre. Unequivocal statements about the dominance of an eccentric display over a central display cannot be made without considering the relative distances and sizes of the displays and the motion contrast between them.
Howard
I P
IP
Institute for Space and Terrestrial Science, York University, Ontario, Canada.
Heckmann
T
T
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007088:Illusions; D007699:Kinesthesis; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009039:Motion Perception; D012399:Rotation; D014794:Visual Fields