title: Ventricular fibrillation in coronary angiography: what is the role of contrast medium?
abstract: A retrospective review of patients with coronary angiography was undertaken to establish the incidence of ventricular fibrillation and other serious arrhythmias and to identify possible causative factors, in particular whether the use of non-ionic contrast medium increased the risk of a serious arrhythmia. Out of 3660 patients reviewed there were 10 cases of ventricular fibrillation. In all cases, there were identifiable technical factors thought to have accounted for the arrhythmia. There were no cases of ventricular fibrillation complicating a technically satisfactory injection of ionic or non-ionic contrast medium. There was no significant difference in the incidence of serious arrhythmias between patients given ionic and those given non-ionic contrast medium.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiodiagnosis, Bristol Royal Infirmary, U.K.
authors.forename: S J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Armstrong
authors.forename: K P
authors.initials: KP
authors.lastname: Murphy
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Wilde
authors.forename: G G
authors.initials: GG
authors.lastname: Hartnell
mesh_terms: D000790:Angiocardiography / Q000009:adverse effects*; D006328:Cardiac Catheterization; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003287:Contrast Media / Q000009:adverse effects*; D003973:Diatrizoate; D006801:Humans; D007479:Iopamidol; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014693:Ventricular Fibrillation / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology*
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media; D003973:Diatrizoate; D007479:Iopamidol