Towards a theory of age-group justice.
Norman Daniels' and Daniel Callahan's recent work attempts to develop and deepen theories of justice in order to accommodate intergenerational moral issues. Elsewhere, I have argued that Callahan's arguments furnish inadequate support for the age rationing policy he accepts. This essay therefore examines Daniels' account of age rationing, together with the complex theory of age-group justice that buttresses it. Sections one and two trace the main features of Daniels' prudential lifespan approach. Section three calls into question the theory's conformity to liberal tenets. The next section attempts to show that the outcome of the prudential approach fails to match our considered judgements. The brief final section offers a broader perspective on the task of articulating a liberal theory of age-group justice.
Jecker
N S
NS
Department of Medical History and Ethics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D004194:Disease; D006262:Health; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000592:standards*; D006299:Health Services for the Aged / Q000600:supply & distribution*; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D018579:Patient Selection; D040841:Resource Allocation; D012935:Social Justice; D012945:Social Values; D014481:United States