How residents cope with living near a hazardous waste landfill: an example of substantive theorizing.
It is hard to be a community or environmental psychologist and not be interested in newspaper stories on global warming, oil spills, or toxic wastes in your own backyard. To the general public, these issues tend to be viewed as environmental, technological, toxicological, or governmental, but not psychological. As psychologists, we see many ways in which psychology does play a role in understanding these events. We have been engaged in a study of residents living near a hazardous waste landfill in which many subdisciplines of psychology have played an illuminating role. Wicker's (this issue) article on substantive theorizing outlines an approach to theory and research that helps communicate the structure and process of doing research on a complex area. We use his article to help us describe key aspects of our research that are not usually discussed in research articles. We believe that the type of research Wicker describes occurs more often than people realize. Unfortunately, however, journal conventions cause investigators to omit discussions of substantive theorizing aspects of their work. We hope that reading this article increases your understanding of substantive theorizing and our research as much as writing it increased our own.
Wandersman
A
A
Dept. of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia 29208.
Hallman
W
W
Berman
S
S
D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D005239:Fear; D006256:Hazardous Waste; D006801:Humans; D009369:Neoplasms; D012107:Research Design; D012307:Risk Factors
D006256:Hazardous Waste