title: [Dentinal adhesives and glass ionomer cements: which are the best?].
abstract: The aim of this study was to examine the degree of marginal infiltration in vitro of some different dentinal bonding agents and glass ionomer cements in class V cavities prepared at cementum-enamel junction. A microfilled composite resin was used in all the cavities. Two-hundred and fifty thermocycle tests were performed after the samples had been in water for 24 hours. After evaluation under optical stereomicroscope, statistically significant differences between the various bonding systems were revealed. It would appear that the new generation of dentinal bonding systems, e.g. Scotchbond 2, Gluma Bond and Superbond, offer significant better in vitro results.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Prati
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Montanari
mesh_terms: D003737:Dental Cavity Preparation / Q000379:methods; D003738:Dental Cements / Q000494:pharmacology*; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods; D003804:Dentin / Q000187:drug effects*; D004353:Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements / Q000494:pharmacology*; D006801:Humans; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D008422:Materials Testing; D013499:Surface Properties; D013696:Temperature
chemical_list: D003738:Dental Cements; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements
vernacular_title: Adesivi dentinali e cementi vetro-ionomerici: quali i migliori?