title: Comparison between panoramic and posterior bitewing radiography in the diagnosis of periodontal bone loss.
abstract: A study is reported comparing the diagnostic yield of panoramic and posterior bitewing radiographs when used to image periodontal bone disease. It is concluded that there is a high concordance between the findings from the two types of radiographs but that the concordance varies with the degree of bone loss and tooth type. Consequently when panoramic radiography is used in clinical practice, the examination should be supplemented by intraoral radiographs in regions when image quality is poor in the panoramic image and where there are structures of special interest.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Akesson
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rohlin
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Håkansson
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Håkansson
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Näsström
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001641:Bicuspid; D001862:Bone Resorption / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D003481:Cuspid; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008963:Molar; D015588:Observer Variation; D010510:Periodontal Diseases / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011861:Radiography, Dental / Q000379:methods*; D011862:Radiography, Panoramic; D014092:Tooth Root