[Effect of performance and state orientation on achievement and attention indicators in a simple stimulus-response task with and without performance feedback].
In formulating his theory of action control, Kuhl (1983) proposed two motivational states: action orientation and state orientation. People who are action oriented are able to ignore all informations in concrete situations which are irrelevant with regard to the preferred goals. Persons who are state oriented tend to focus sooner on the outlast aspects of a special state. Kuhl introduced a questionnaire HAKEMP to record these tendencies. Further on, there occurs the general assumption that in a particular state of state orientation, people have only a limited processing capacity for given tasks. This hypothesis was tested in an experiment (n = 88) with a stimulus-reaction task. The conditions were varied by the type of the task (fixed or variable stimulus interval) and feedback for the subjects' ability to react. It was expected that for the fixed stimulus interval condition, state-oriented people would be less efficient than action-oriented subjects; with feedback there should be increasing results. The experiment however, shows no significant difference between the performance of state- and action-oriented subjects. These results are discussed in relation to modifications of the HAKEMP questionnaire.
Schweflinghaus
W
W
Kiesswetter
E
E
Schmidt
K H
KH
Rutenfranz
J
J
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001143:Arousal; D001288:Attention; D005246:Feedback; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time
Der Einfluss von Handlungs- und Lageorientierung auf Leistungs- und Beanspruchungsindikatoren bei einer einfachen Reiz-Reaktionsaufgabe mit und ohne Leistungsrückmeldung.