title: Substantive theorizing.
abstract: This paper outlines, for purposes of discussion and debate, an ecologically oriented approach to theory and research in psychology and related social sciences. This approach, labeled "substantive theorizing", is intended as a constructive response to recent critiqies of the logical positivism paradigm. Substantive theorizing is presented as the intersection of a series of choices by researchers, including decisions to focus on limited but socially important domains; to use multiple methods; to develop intimate familiarity with chosen domains; and to examine processes in their natural social and temporal contexts. The approach emphasizes the process, rather than the product, of conceptual framing and development. Among the projected benefits of substantive theorizing are development of new concepts and procedures, blurring of disciplinary boundaries, greater understanding of socially important domains, and increased utility of research for policy and practice. Projected costs include long-term research commitments and lack of support from academic departments and research funding agencies.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Claremont Graduate School, California 91711-6175.
authors.forename: A W
authors.initials: AW
authors.lastname: Wicker
mesh_terms: D002755:Choice Behavior; D006801:Humans; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011593:Psychology, Social / Q000379:methods*; D012107:Research Design; D012108:Research Personnel; D012109:Research Support as Topic