title: Comparison of manual and computer-controlled self-recorded audiometric methods for serial monitoring of hearing.
abstract: Manual and self-recorded audiograms obtained from 240 ears on two occasions 2-3 years apart were compared, with the objective of establishing the preferred method for serial monitoring of hearing thresholds. The self-recording method incorporates an objective scoring algorithm which is compared with subjective scoring carried out independently by two experienced audiology staff members. The objective scoring method agreed well with the subjective method but gives substantial advantages in terms of cost and freedom from scorer bias. The variability associated with manual audiometry was somewhat lower than that associated with self-recording audiometry when used for serial monitoring.
authors.affiliation: Institue of Hearing Research, Nottingham Clinical Outstation, General Hospital.
authors.forename: M E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Lutman
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Cane
authors.forename: P A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Smith
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D001299:Audiometry / Q000379:methods*; D001301:Audiometry, Pure-Tone / Q000379:methods*; D001309:Auditory Threshold / Q000502:physiology; D001330:Electronic Data Processing; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans