Some additional predictions and further tests of the Marr-Ullman model of motion perception.
The Marr-Ullman model for motion detection in the human visual system functions by means of the dual input of polarity-specific edge detectors and luminance change detectors. Moulden and Begg (1986) found a polarity-specific motion aftereffect which they claimed provided support for this dual input model. The logic of their experiment is examined, and it is shown that several additional predictions arise from the Marr-Ullman model, which were not supported by Moulden and Begg's study. A more powerful experiment was carried out and these additional predictions were disconfirmed, although the polarity-specific effect did emerge. A consideration of alternative explanations of this effect led to a second experiment in which an attempt was made to discover the actual determinants of the effect. This revealed that polarity-specific units are unlikely to play any part in the phenomenon. It was concluded, in the light of this and other evidence, that one of a class of alternative models is more likely to be the actual mechanism for motion perception. However, careful consideration of the Marr-Ullman model indicated that it may be untestable in principle if various differentially weighted levels of neural integration are envisaged.
Webb
B
B
Department of Psychology, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Wenderoth
P
P
D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005556:Form Perception; D006801:Humans; D008027:Light; D009039:Motion Perception; D009949:Orientation; D011930:Reaction Time