Responses of single cells in the cat inferior colliculus to binaural masking level difference signals.
Neurones with low best frequency (less than 2 kHz) and sensitive to interaural phase differences were recorded in the dorsal part of the central nucleus of the cat inferior colliculus. Best frequency tone (S) and noise (N) bursts were delivered binaurally via closed field sound systems either in phase (S0, N0) at both ears or inverted at one ear (SII, NII). The responses to tone + noise bursts in the stimulus configurations S0N0, SIINII and SIIN0 and noise bursts (N0 and NII) were compared. The latter two tone + noise configurations (S0NII and SIIN0) give a binaural masking level difference (BMLD) of up to 15 dB in psychophysical experiments, i.e. an increase in noise level is necessary to mask perception of the tone. Most cells responded better to in phase stimuli (here called 0 cells). A minority of cells responded better to out of phase stimuli (here called II cells). Each cell's response was correlated with the level of acoustic stimulus (tone or masker) in the preferred configuration and not with the BMLD situation: for the 0 cells, the responses were therefore maximal for S0N0 and minimal for SIINII. For II cells, the gradation was reversed: the response to SIINII was maximal and that to S0N0 minimal. For both populations, the responses to S0NII and SIIN0 were intermediate between the S0N0 and SIINII responses. Cells that responded best to S0NII or SIIN0, i.e. cells selectively coding BMLD, were not found. This was also true for the synchronized spike rates of those cells showing phase locked responses to the stimulus frequency. Some cells appeared to be strongly suppressed by the addition of an non-preferred masker (i.e. in the configuration that resulted in less response to a noise-alone burst; e.g. NII for the 0 cells). Other cells were more suppressed by the addition of a preferred masker (N0 for the 0 cells). The difference in the number of spikes evoked by the tone + noise and the noise burst was analyzed according to signal detection theory and neuronal masked threshold determined. Some 0 cells showed lower thresholds in the configuration S0NII whereas others had higher thresholds in this configuration. This correlated with the binaural suppression effects noted above: when the noise in the preferred configuration (N0) gave more suppression, the threshold was lower for S0NII; when NII gave more suppression the threshold was higher for S0NII. Over the whole population, these effects cancelled out and the neuronal threshold was not significantly affected by the BMLD configuration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Caird
D
D
Zentrum der Physiologie, Frankfurt am Main, F.R.G.
Pillmann
F
F
Klinke
R
R
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D000200:Action Potentials; D000818:Animals; D002415:Cats; D005260:Female; D006309:Hearing / Q000502:physiology*; D007245:Inferior Colliculi / Q000166:cytology*; D008297:Male; D009622:Noise; D010470:Perceptual Masking / Q000502:physiology*; D010507:Periodicity; D011930:Reaction Time; D012684:Sensory Thresholds