Temporomandibular joint arthrography: a comparison between a fluoroscopic and a nonfluoroscopic technique.
A nonfluoroscopic temporomandibular joint arthrographic technique is contrasted with a more widely employed fluoroscopically guided technique. The nonfluoroscopic technique uses a posterior approach to joint injection, as contrasted with the lateral injection approach of the fluoroscopically guided technique. The advantages of the nonfluoroscopic technique are less radiation dose to the patient, less expensive and less sophisticated imaging equipment, and less potential for neurovascular trauma. The fluoroscopic technique offers greater control of the procedure, less patient and operator time, and the capability for a dynamic videofluoroscopic study. Both techniques appear to be safe and efficacious. Differences in anatomy, imaging modalities, patient radiation exposure, and potential complications are also discussed as part of this comparison.
Benson
B W
BW
Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology, Baylor College of Dentistry, Dallas, Texas.
Langlais
R P
RP
Abramovitch
K
K
D001175:Arthrography / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D005471:Fluoroscopy / Q000009:adverse effects; D006801:Humans; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D013704:Temporomandibular Joint / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*