title: Palpable prostatic nodules: comparison of US and digital guidance for fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
abstract: This study was undertaken to evaluate the use of transrectal sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and to compare sonographic with digital guidance for biopsy. In 62 patients in whom prostatic carcinoma was suspected at digital rectal examination, fine-needle aspiration biopsies were performed transperineally under sonographic guidance and transrectally under digital guidance. These patients had 89 nodules, 73 of which were sampled with both techniques. Malignant cells were obtained under digital guidance in 17 of 73 nodules (23%) and under sonographic guidance in 16 (22%). An additional seven nodules, which were not seen sonographically, were sampled under digital guidance and proved to be negative. In nine other nodules that were nonpalpable and evident only with sonography, malignant cells were obtained under sonographic guidance in three. These findings indicate that sonographic guidance for fine-needle aspiration biopsy is as good as digital guidance for palpable lesions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
authors.forename: S A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Ajzen
authors.forename: S L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Goldenberg
authors.forename: G J
authors.initials: GJ
authors.lastname: Allen
authors.forename: P L
authors.initials: PL
authors.lastname: Cooperberg
authors.forename: N H
authors.initials: NH
authors.lastname: Chan
authors.forename: E C
authors.initials: EC
authors.lastname: Jones
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001707:Biopsy, Needle / Q000379:methods*; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010173:Palpation; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011467:Prostate / Q000473:pathology*; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology*; D014463:Ultrasonography