Intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of peripheral vascular trauma.
The role of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA) in the evaluation of extremity trauma has not been clearly established. Several potential advantages would make IADSA a preferable study to conventional angiography (CA). This retrospective study analyzed 104 major peripheral arteries with suspected injury. Multiplane IADSA studies were compared with conventional angiography of the same vessel in 97 patients. The arteriograms were evaluated by a physician and a radiologist in a double-blinded fashion. IADSA correlated well with CA. Similar findings comparing both studies were noted in 101 of 104 angiograms (97%) (p less than 0.001) in review by the radiologist and in 100 of 104 (96%) (p less than 0.001) by the surgeon. Only one injury confirmed at surgery was not seen on IADSA; this study was read as equivocal by both examiners. These data confirm that IADSA is a reliable and reasonable study for the evaluation of patients with suspected peripheral arterial injury.
Howard
C A
CA
Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75235-9031.
Thal
E R
ER
Redman
H C
HC
Gibson
P
P
D000792:Angiography / Q000379:methods; D001808:Blood Vessels / Q000293:injuries*; D005121:Extremities / Q000098:blood supply*; D006801:Humans; D007482:Iothalamate Meglumine / Q000008:administration & dosage; D013382:Subtraction Technique; D014656:Vascular Surgical Procedures
D007482:Iothalamate Meglumine