title: [Ultrasonic diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. A comparison with venography].
abstract: In a prospective study ultrasonography (US) was compared with venography for diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis of the leg. Using venography, thrombosis was demonstrated in 25 patients. Based on two criteria, non-compressible vein and intraluminal echoes, US showed thrombosis in 23 patients, i.e. the sensitivity was 92%. Isolated calf vein thrombosis was demonstrated in 2 out of 4 patients. In 18% of the patients with negative venography other pathological conditions were demonstrated by US, (i.e. Baker's cysts, calf vein hematomas and superficial calf vein thrombosis) which could explain the clinical condition. Venography is a somewhat costly procedure. The cost of films and non-ionic contrast medium is approximately NOK 400, while the cost of film for US examination is about NOK 10.
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Brabrand
authors.forename: O
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Sortland
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D005260:Female; D005268:Femoral Vein / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009664:Norway; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011859:Radiography; D013927:Thrombosis / Q000175:diagnosis*; D014463:Ultrasonography / Q000191:economics
vernacular_title: Ultralyddiagnostikk ved dyp venetrombose. En sammenlikning med venografi.