title: Cervical incompetence.
abstract: In the early 1950s, when treatment of cervical incompetence was first described, diagnosis seemed relatively simple and management favorable, but after more than 35 years of trying multiple variations of procedures and treatment regimens, no advances have been made. In 1959, Neser questioned the very existence of cervical incompetence as an entity, and concluded that, in the final analysis, the problem is a diagnostic one. Liberal use of cerclage in situations of moderate risk of preterm delivery or as a prophylactic measure for multiple gestation does not appear to improve outcome, as judged by prematurity or survival. Because of advances in neonatal care in the last decade, fetal survival has improved tremendously. It is hoped that, in the future, more objective and accurate criteria for the diagnosis of cervical incompetence will emerge, and that outcome of treatment will be measured not by fetal survival, but by prolongation of pregnancy and by birth weight. At present, making an unequivocal diagnosis of cervical incompetence remains an elusive, challenging, and unsolved problem.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Shortle
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Jewelewicz
mesh_terms: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D002584:Cervix Uteri / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D011247:Pregnancy; D011374:Progesterone / Q000627:therapeutic use; D011372:Progestins / Q000627:therapeutic use; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection / Q000517:prevention & control; D015149:Tocolytic Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D002581:Uterine Cervical Incompetence / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000628:therapy
chemical_list: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D011372:Progestins; D015149:Tocolytic Agents; D011374:Progesterone