title: Functional orthopedic magnetic appliance (FOMA) II--modus operandi.
abstract: A new functional appliance (FA) to correct Class II dentoskeletal malocclusions is introduced. The functional orthopedic magnetic appliance (FOMA) II uses upper and lower attracting magnetic means (Nd2Fe14B) to constrain the lower jaw in an advanced sagittal posture. In vitro, a special gauge transducer measured the magnetic attractive path and forces. In vivo, 13 prepubertal female Macaca fascicularis monkeys received facial implants and were treated for 4 months with the following appliances: conventional FA (four subjects), FOMA II (five subjects), a combined FOMA II + FA (two subjects), and sham (control) appliance (two subjects). The in vitro results showed the following: vertico-sagitally displaced upper and lower magnets attracted ultimately along an oblique line with a terminal horizonal slide to become fully superimposed; the functional performance improved when the magnetic interface acted as a magnetic inclined plane; and the magnetic force was able to guide and constrain the mandible toward the constructive protrusive closure position (CPCP) (1.2 mm, F = 570 gm) from levels below the habitual rest position (3 mm, F = 219 gm) and the electromyographic (EMG) relaxed position (8.5 mm, F = 45 gm). The in vivo results demonstrated the following: functional performance increased in FOMA II (22%) and in the combined FOMA II + FA (28%) over the conventional FA; mandibular length increased significantly in the treated animals (means = 2.83 +/- 0.70 mm) over the control animals (means = 0.43 +/- 0.08 mm); incisor proclination was lower in magnetic appliances (means = 4.57 +/- 1.76 degrees) than in the conventional FA (means = 8.75 +/- 1.85 degrees); mandibular elongation and condylar posterior inclination resulted from posterosuperior endochondral growth (increased cell proliferation and/or hyperplasia of functional chondroblasts) and by bony remodeling of the condylar neck (apposition posterior border, resorption anterior border), respectively; virtually no anterior displacement of the postglenoid spine (means = 0.19 +/- 0.68 mm) nor the articular eminence (means = 0.36 +/- 0.69 mm) was found. Increased lower posterior alveolar height (means = 1.71 +/- 0.82 mm) is a major impediment in the correction of excessive lower anterior facial height. The results of the study highly recommend the exploration of the clinical application of the FOMA II.
authors.affiliation: American Dental Association, Research Institute/Health Foundation, Chicago, IL 60611.
authors.forename: A D
authors.initials: AD
authors.lastname: Vardimon
authors.forename: J J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Stutzmann
authors.forename: T M
authors.initials: TM
authors.lastname: Graber
authors.forename: L R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Voss
authors.forename: A G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Petrovic
mesh_terms: D000202:Activator Appliances; D000818:Animals; D002358:Cartilage, Articular / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000254:growth & development; D002508:Cephalometry; D003766:Dental Occlusion; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D007568:Jaw / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D008252:Macaca fascicularis; D008280:Magnetics; D008335:Mandibular Condyle / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000254:growth & development; D009968:Orthodontic Appliances, Removable; D013704:Temporomandibular Joint / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000254:growth & development