title: Threshold equivalence between perimeters.
abstract: To determine equivalence between perimeters, 49 eyes of 35 subjects underwent static threshold testing of the central 30 degrees twice on each of three automated perimeters and twice by manual kinetic threshold testing with the Goldmann perimeter. The Octopus-Humphrey difference was 3.3 dB (2.3 dB in the upper two rows for programs 32 and 30-2). The Dicon-Octopus difference was 3.5 dB and the Dicon-Humphrey, 6.5 dB. The I4e stimulus of the Goldmann perimeter was equivalent to 17.1 dB, 13.6 dB, and 10.8 dB on the Humphrey, Octopus, and Dicon perimeters, respectively. The III4e stimulus of the Goldmann perimeter, used for visual impairment determination, was roughly equivalent to 7 to 10 dB, 4 to 7 dB, and 0 to 6 dB on the Humphrey, Octopus, and Dicon perimeters, respectively. The prediction when converting from one instrument to another was only 10% less reliable than the ability of a perimeter to predict the values on a second examination with the same perimeter. Validity of the conversion formulas was confirmed by the age-corrected normal values available for the Octopus, Humphrey, and Goldmann perimeters.
authors.affiliation: Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, FL 33101.
authors.forename: D R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Anderson
authors.forename: W J
authors.initials: WJ
authors.lastname: Feuer
authors.forename: W L
authors.initials: WL
authors.lastname: Alward
authors.forename: G L
authors.initials: GL
authors.lastname: Skuta
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005901:Glaucoma / Q000503:physiopathology; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D011379:Prognosis; D012016:Reference Values; D012044:Regression Analysis; D058609:Visual Field Tests / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000592:standards*; D014794:Visual Fields