Needlestick injuries at operations for trauma. Are surgical gloves an effective barrier?
Surgeons are at risk from both hepatitis B and human immunodeficiency viruses. While vaccines have been developed against the former, barrier methods remain the mainstay of protection. Puncture wounds of the hand are a potential source of contamination; the protection afforded by surgical gloves has been investigated. Gloves from 280 orthopaedic operations for trauma were tested for perforations; one or more was found after 30% of the operations in gloves worn by the surgeon or scrub nurse. About 60% of the perforations were noticed at the time of penetration and most affected the dominant thumb and index finger. Puncture was more common during operations lasting more than one hour. The incidence of perforation was 19% for the outer of double gloves, 14% for a single glove and 6% for the inner of double gloves. These results indicate that surgical gloves function poorly as a protective barrier, especially in difficult, lengthy, fracture surgery. The practice of double-gloving confers increased but not absolute protection.
McLeod
G G
GG
Princess Margaret Rose Orthopaedic Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland.
D000163:Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000635:transmission; D013502:General Surgery; D005932:Gloves, Surgical; D006509:Hepatitis B / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000635:transmission; D006801:Humans; D009339:Needles; D009871:Operating Room Nursing; D013997:Time Factors; D014951:Wounds, Stab / Q000517:prevention & control*