title: [Antifungigram: interpretation and choice of a technic].
abstract: Identification and in vitro susceptibility testing of fungi is necessary mainly in immunocompromised patients. So, after a survey of the epidemiological results, the authors specified the indications of susceptibility tests; their advantages and difficulties and the lots of variations related to the fungus, drug, medium and technic. The authors compared the more recent methods from their experience: susceptibility to 6 antifungals (amphotericin B, flucytosine and 4 imidazoles) was estimated in 122 yeast strains isolated from deep specimens by 5 marketed technics. They got a good correlation between Mycototal and Antifongigramme Pasteur, but the two other technics (Mycodisk and Neosensitabs) frequently showed unreliable results.
authors.affiliation: Service de Parasitologie, Hôpital Michalion, Grenoble.
authors.forename: O
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Vermorel
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lebeau
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Claustre
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Grillot
mesh_terms: D000935:Antifungal Agents / Q000494:pharmacology; D015169:Colony Count, Microbial; D005658:Fungi / Q000187:drug effects / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D008826:Microbial Sensitivity Tests / Q000379:methods*; D009181:Mycoses / Q000453:epidemiology
chemical_list: D000935:Antifungal Agents
vernacular_title: Antifongigramme: interprétation et choix d'une technique.