title: [Lens drain versus Donaldson drain: intermediate results of a prospective comparative study of a new versus a classical ventilation tube].
abstract: A prospective study was undertaken in which in 72 children a new type of tympanostomy tube, the Lens drain, was inserted in one ear, and a Donaldson drain was inserted in the contralateral ear as a control. The average survival times of both tubes especially seemed to differ significantly: 15.25 months for the new tube, and 10.53 months for the conventional tube (p less than 0.05). By contrast, the relapse rate (20% with the Lens tube versus 27% with the Donaldson tube) after extrusion or extraction, and the residual perforation rate (8% with the Lens tube versus 5% with the Donaldson tube) were not significantly different. Otorrhea was apparently present equally frequently with either tube: 19% with the Lens tube versus 15% with the Donaldson tube.
authors: Dienst N.K.O., Academisch Ziekenhuis en Farmaceutisch Instituut, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
authors: F
authors: F
authors: Gordts
authors: P A
authors: PA
authors: Clement
authors: M P
authors: MP
authors: Derde
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008297:Male; D008876:Middle Ear Ventilation / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation*; D010034:Otitis Media with Effusion / Q000628:therapy*; D010035:Otitis Media, Suppurative / Q000628:therapy; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011897:Random Allocation
vernacular_title: Lens-drain versus Donaldson-drain: tussentijdse resultaten van een prospectieve studie ter vergelijking van een nieuw- met een klassiek ventilatiebuisje.