Enhancing lineup identification accuracy: two codes are better than one.
Ways of improving identification accuracy were explored by comparing the conventional visual lineup with an auditory/visual lineup, one that paired color photographs with voice recordings. This bimodal lineup necessitated sequential presentation of lineup members; Experiment 1 showed that performance in sequential lineups was better than performance in traditional simultaneous lineups. In Experiments 2A and 2B unimodal and bimodal lineups were compared by using a multiple-lineup paradigm: Ss viewed 3 videotaped episodes depicting standard police procedures and were tested in 4 sequential lineups. Bimodal lineups were more diagnostic than either visual or auditory lineups alone. The bimodal lineup led to a 126% improvement in number of correct identifications over the conventional visual lineup, with no concomitant increase in number of false identifications. These results imply strongly that bimodal procedures should be adopted in real-world lineups. The nature of memorial processes underlying this bimodal advantage is discussed.
Melara
R D
RD
DeWitt-Rickards
T S
TS
O'Brien
T P
TP
D003415:Crime; D003416:Criminal Law; D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence; D008568:Memory; D013067:Speech Perception; D014481:United States; D014796:Visual Perception; D014831:Voice