title: Esophageal transection may well be the approach of choice for patient with portal venous obstruction and esophageal varices.
abstract: Thirty patients with esophageal varices, portal venous obstruction and a histologically proven normal liver underwent either one of 2 different types of surgery. Shunt surgery was performed on 20 patients: 9 had a mesocaval shunt, 3, a splenorenal shunt, 4, a left gastric venacaval shunt, and 4, a distal splenorenal shunt. Conversely, direct interruption was performed on the other 10 patients; 6 underwent an esophageal transection, and 4 underwent a resection of the proximal stomach. Re-hemorrhage occurred in 7 of the former 20 patients but not in any of the 10 on whom the direct interruption method was used. In 6 of these 7 patients who experienced rebleeding, subsequent direct interruption surgery led to control of the bleeding. One patient died of a variceal hemorrhage one month postoperatively. The total 10 year cumulative survival rate was 86.3 per cent. In the light of these findings, we believe that methods of direct interruption, such as esophageal transection, may well be the approach of choice for patients with esophageal varices caused by extrahepatic portal venous obstruction.
authors: Second Department of surgery, Kyushu University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Kitano
authors: Y
authors: Y
authors: Iso
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Iwanaga
authors: N
authors: N
authors: Koyanagi
authors: K
authors: K
authors: Sugimachi
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D004932:Esophageal and Gastric Varices / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011169:Portal Vein; D011170:Portasystemic Shunt, Surgical / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods* / Q000401:mortality; D011379:Prognosis; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013927:Thrombosis / Q000601:surgery*