[Against premature facilitation of clinico-hermeneutic and theoretical scientific empirical aspects. Comments on W. Tress, research on psychogenic diseases between clinico-hermeneutic and theoretical scientific empirical aspects: social empirical markers as mediators].
The paper presented here is a contribution to the debate on the methodological dualism of hermeneutical and nomothetical procedures in psychotherapy and psychotherapeutic research. Recently, W. Tress has made re-commendations to mediate between both spheres by applying so-called "socio-empirical markers". This concept is criticized. Rather than precipitately mediating between clinical hermeneutics and empirical nomology, a critical differentiation of both methodologies is advocated. The inter-methodological dialog is furthered best by supporting hermeneutical methodology which has been devaluated in present day psychotherapy research. Recommendations to enhance the application of hermeneutics in psychoanalytic psychotherapy are given.
Küchenhoff
J
J
D003142:Communication; D006801:Humans; D010553:Personality Development; D011574:Psychoanalytic Theory; D011575:Psychoanalytic Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D012931:Social Environment
Gegen eine vorschnelle Vermittlung von klinisch-hermeneutischer und gesetzeswissenschaftlicher Empirie. Bemerkungen zu W. Tress, Forschung zu psychogenen Erkrankungen zwischen klinisch-hermeneutischer und gesetzeswissenschaftlicher Empirie: Sozialempirische Marker als Vermittler.