Comparison of volatile acid number test with enzymatic acetic acid assay for assessment of seafood quality.
Volatile acid number, an official AOAC method for assessing seafood quality, was compared with an enzymatic method for measuring acetic acid. Thirty-eight samples of fresh fish and 23 samples of canned fish were evaluated. The data showed high positive correlations between volatile acid number and enzymatic acetic acid methods; the correlation coefficient was 0.98 for fresh fish and 0.95 for canned fish. Positive correlation coefficients of 0.93 and 0.96 were also associated with samples of fish divided into 2 groups on the basis of acceptable or unacceptable quality, respectively. There was no significant difference between the means for the volatile acid number and enzymatic acetic acid procedures at the 5% level of significance. Decomposition studies on cod and mackerel, representing a lean and fatty fish, respectively, were monitored over 9 days by using the following analyses: volatile acid number, acetic acid, total volatile bases, and thiobarbituric acid. Results of the decomposition studies showed that enzymatic acetic acid levels closely paralleled volatile acid number values in both lean and fatty fish. Total volatile bases was a reliable supplemental measure for evaluating lean seafood quality, whereas thiobarbituric acid was more appropriate for further assessment of fatty fish quality.
McCarthy
H T
HT
Rhode Island Department of Health, Division of Laboratories, St. Providence 02904.
Ellis
P C
PC
Silva
M L
ML
Mills
B
B
D000085:Acetates / Q000032:analysis; D000143:Acids / Q000032:analysis*; D000818:Animals; D005399:Fishes / Q000378:metabolism*; D007202:Indicators and Reagents; D008460:Meat / Q000032:analysis*; D008461:Meat Products / Q000032:analysis; D011786:Quality Control; D012044:Regression Analysis
D000085:Acetates; D000143:Acids; D007202:Indicators and Reagents