title: Characterization of creep feed consumption and its subsequent effects on immune response, scouring index and performance of weanling pigs.
abstract: Four trials were conducted to characterize the consumption of creep feed by nursing pigs and the effects of creep feeding (from 10 d to weaning at 28 d) on the immune response, scouring index and subsequent performance of weanling pigs. Pigs were fed a ground 20% CP corn-soybean meal-whey diet with 1.0% chromic oxide (control, 9 litters), this diet with 2.7% ovalbumin added as a dietary antigen (ovalbumin, 14 litters), or no creep feed (unexposed, 11 litters). At weaning, pigs within a litter were fed a 20% CP corn-soybean meal diet either with or without 2.7% ovalbumin. Creep-fed litters began eating at 11 d of age and disappearance of creep feed increased linearly until weaning (P less than .01). However, based on the chronic oxide coloring of the feces, total creep feed consumption was quite variable from pig to pig (13 to 194 g) and from litter to litter (107 to 1,550 g). Preweaning daily gain was similar between creep-fed and noncreep-fed litters; larger litters generally had lower daily gains (P less than .09) and less feed disappearance per pig (P less than .02). Weekly blood sampling showed that pigs fed the antigen diet had a higher (P less than .001) antibody titer to ovalbumin at 14, 21 and 28 d of age than did pigs fed the control diet or pigs unexposed to creep feed. At 56 and 63 d of age, all pigs given an ovalbumin injection at 49 d (1 ml containing 3 mg of ovalbumin) had responded (P less than .001) to injection, with the lowest titers for pigs fed the control creep diet and the highest titers for pigs fed the ovalbumin creep diet; titers were intermediate for pigs not fed creep. Regardless of preweaning or postweaning treatment, most pigs began scouring 4 to 5 d postweaning; scouring peaked at d 10 and returned to normal after d 15. Although the magnitude of difference was small, creep-fed pigs tended to scour more than pigs not fed creep (P less than .01). Postweaning performance was not influenced by preweaning treatments.
authors: Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg.
authors: K L
authors: KL
authors: Barnett
authors: E T
authors: ET
authors: Kornegay
authors: C R
authors: CR
authors: Risley
authors: M D
authors: MD
authors: Lindemann
authors: G G
authors: GG
authors: Schurig
mesh_terms: D000821:Animal Feed; D000818:Animals; D000917:Antibody Formation; D003967:Diarrhea / Q000276:immunology / Q000662:veterinary*; D004435:Eating; D005260:Female; D006386:Hemagglutination Tests; D008098:Litter Size; D008297:Male; D010047:Ovalbumin / Q000276:immunology; D011897:Random Allocation; D012044:Regression Analysis; D013552:Swine / Q000254:growth & development / Q000276:immunology*; D013553:Swine Diseases / Q000276:immunology; D014886:Weaning; D015430:Weight Gain
chemical_list: D010047:Ovalbumin