title: [Medical graduate and basic education in Austria: emergency or surplus? Objective evaluation or bureaucratic regimentation?].
abstract: If there is a reform of medical school, it will be desirable to keep the positive aspects of our tradition, while adding favourable aspects out of international experience. We will need to shorten unprofitable ballast, which means theory in excess, seeking for more practical and well accessable knowledge capability of independent work and decisionmaking. We need better communication ("humanization") in medicine. It is necessary to take the whole education system into consideration: college up to professorship, as they are linked together. We cannot recommend to increase the number of exams, but we support a continuating control, working in small groups promoting the motivation of the students. They must see more sense in their studies. Rather intensify the control and supervision of the system of instruction than to reinforce the learning control of students by exams. We reject to explain all failures and disappointments in medical school by lack of financial means or because of competences which overlap each other. Many things could be changed within existing laws. Partly they have to be changed by altering laws. A number of practical possible ways to reach this target are pointed out here.
authors.affiliation: Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institut für Neuro-Rehabilitation und -prophylaxe, Landes-Nervenkrankenhauses Valduna, Rankweil.
authors.forename: G S
authors.initials: GS
authors.lastname: Barolin
mesh_terms: D001317:Austria; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003479:Curriculum; D004501:Education, Medical / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D004503:Education, Medical, Graduate / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D004521:Educational Measurement; D006801:Humans; D009042:Motivation
vernacular_title: Arztliche Fortbildung und Ausbildung in Osterreich: Notstand oder Uberfluss? Sachliche Aufwertung oder bürokratische Reglementierung?