A comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, complement fixation and virus isolation for foot and mouth disease diagnosis.
A total of 205 epithelial tissue samples were examined for the presence of foot and mouth disease virus by either the complement-fixation (CF) test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and/or by virus isolation in bovine thyroid or kidney cell cultures. The virus was isolated from 134 of the 201 (67%) specimens. Samples, from which virus was isolated, were termed virus-positive samples. The CF test detected viral antigen in 30 (24%) of 123 virus-positive samples, whereas the ELISA detected it in 100 (81%) of these specimens. The ELISA was thus at least 3 times more efficient than the CF test in detecting the virus in epithelial-tissue samples. There were 5 samples from which virus was not isolated but which were positive with the ELISA procedure. The ELISA was particularly useful for testing samples from pigs and for assessing specimens from animals with resolving lesions. The ELISA gave virus type-specific results in 89% of 63 virus-positive cases compared to 40% for the CF test. The ELISA was thus a very useful, accurate and sensitive method for the direct testing of epithelial tissues of affected animals.
Westbury
H A
HA
CSIRO, Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Vic.
Doughty
W J
WJ
Forman
A J
AJ
Tangchaitrong
S
S
Kongthon
A
A
D000818:Animals; D005537:Aphthovirus / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D002417:Cattle; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D003168:Complement Fixation Tests; D004797:Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; D004848:Epithelium / Q000382:microbiology; D005536:Foot-and-Mouth Disease / Q000175:diagnosis*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests