title: Imagery, memory, and size-distance invariance.
abstract: The size-distance invariance hypothesis (SDIH) was examined for remembered and imaged stimuli. In Experiment 1, subjects gave remembered and imaged distances of familiar objects and imaged distance of nondescript rods. The relationship between stated size and distance is more adequately described by power functions with exponents less than 1 than by the more restricted SDIH (exponent of 1). In Experiment 2, subjects gave distance estimates to recalled and imaged familiar objects and described the visual context in which each object was situated. A different group then sorted the contexts into categories based on general similarity. There were no significant differences between distance estimates based on memory and those based on imagery, and the visual contexts were not sorted according to whether they were generated in the memory or in the imagery conditions. In Experiment 3, subjects estimated the distances to objects in an outdoor setting. A linear relationship was found between estimated and physical distance, suggesting that the lower exponents obtained in Experiments 1 and 2 were not artifacts of the distance judgment procedure.
authors.forename: T L
authors.initials: TL
authors.lastname: Hubbard
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Kall
authors.forename: J C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Baird
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005556:Form Perception; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination; D008568:Memory; D011939:Mental Recall; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D012660:Semantics; D012858:Size Perception