title: Management of vaginal vault prolapse: retrospective comparison of abdominal versus vaginal approach.
abstract: Twenty-two cases of vaginal vault prolapse were managed by our service over the five-year period ending 12/31/86. Eleven cases were repaired by a transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy and 11 by a transabdominal suspension. There were no differences in demographic data or preoperative symptoms between these groups. The vaginal procedure required less operative time, had less blood loss, averaged fewer hospital days and overall was more economical. The complication rates and follow-up results of the two techniques were comparable. The abdominal procedure is considered preferable for patients with specific indications for an abdominal approach. The vaginal procedure appears to be more appropriate when the abdominal approach is not otherwise indicated. The experience of the surgeon and individualization of the patient are important factors in choosing the best approach for the repair.
authors.forename: W E
authors.initials: WE
authors.lastname: Brown
authors.forename: M S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Hoffman
authors.forename: P J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Bouis
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Ingram
authors.forename: S L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Hopes
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006417:Hematuria / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D008722:Methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology; D012008:Recurrence; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013997:Time Factors; D014596:Uterine Prolapse / Q000601:surgery*