title: Selectional processes in causality judgment.
abstract: Two experiments illustrate the way in which competition between potential causes occurs when subjects are asked to judge the extent to which an action is the cause of an outcome. In the first experiment, it was found that introducing occurrences of the outcome in the absence of the action reduced causality judgments, but this effect was attenuated if these outcomes were signaled by another stimulus. In the second experiment, a delay between the action and the outcome reduced judgments, but this could be abolished by inserting a stimulus between the action and the outcome. The results are discussed in terms of a view of causality judgment that assumes that such judgments are based on associations between the mental representations of the action and the outcome.
authors.forename: D R
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Shanks
mesh_terms: D001245:Association Learning; D003071:Cognition; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D007858:Learning; D011340:Problem Solving; D011597:Psychomotor Performance