Physiological responses to the pulsation threshold paradigm. I: Pulsation threshold patterns do not reproduce physiological rate profiles of high-pass and low-pass noise maskers.
This article compares psychophysical measures of human processing of acoustic stimuli with one neurophysiological representation (normalized discharge rate profiles) of those stimuli. Psychophysical pulsation threshold patterns (PTPs) were derived for high-pass and low-pass noise maskers. Spectral features of both maskers are clearly evident in the PTPs. However, while the representation of high-pass noise in the PTPs becomes sharper with increasing masker level, the representation of low-pass noise degenerates as masker level is increased. One assumption that has been used previously to interpret pulsation threshold data is that PTPs reflect the profile of activity in primary neural elements in response to the masking stimulus. To investigate this hypothesis, normalized-rate profiles of responses to both maskers were derived from populations of auditory-nerve fibers in cats. Normalized-rate profiles do not exhibit the same behavior as PTPs for high-pass noise maskers in that the neural representation of the band edge degenerates as sound level increases. Furthermore, the distinction between the passband and the stop band is lost in the neural rate profiles, whereas the distinction improves in the high-pass noise PTPs.
Hellstrom
L I
LI
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000328:Adult; D000818:Animals; D001309:Auditory Threshold / Q000502:physiology*; D002415:Cats; D006801:Humans; D010470:Perceptual Masking / Q000502:physiology*; D011571:Psychoacoustics; D000159:Vestibulocochlear Nerve / Q000502:physiology