Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance.
The purpose of this study was to examine the results of treatment with a modified Herbst appliance. The pretreatment and posttreatment cephalometric and dental cast records of 32 consecutively treated Class II, Division 1 cases were evaluated. Results showed that the skeletal Class II correction was achieved by an average 1.5 mm of greater than normal forward mandibular growth in conjunction with a minimal "headgear" effect inhibiting maxillary growth. Dental Class II correction was achieved by significant amounts of distal bodily movement and tipping of the maxillary first molars combined with bodily forward movement of the mandibular first molars. Significant increases were seen in maxillary arch length and maxillary intercanine and intermolar widths, while the mandibular arch demonstrated few changes. Slight forward movement of the mandibular incisors was noted with no significant change occurring in the maxillary incisors.
Valant
J R
JR
Department of Orthodontics, Baylor College of Dentistry.
Sinclair
P M
PM
D000202:Activator Appliances; D002508:Cephalometry; D002648:Child; D003724:Dental Arch / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000254:growth & development; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008310:Malocclusion / Q000628:therapy*; D008312:Malocclusion, Angle Class II / Q000628:therapy*; D008334:Mandible / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000254:growth & development; D008437:Maxilla / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000254:growth & development; D009968:Orthodontic Appliances, Removable; D012886:Skull / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D014716:Vertical Dimension