title: Perceiving choice and constraint: the effects of contextual and behavioral cues on attitude attribution.
abstract: We examined how features of the situation and the target's behavior in the attitude-attribution paradigm may lead observers to infer that the behavior was performed purposefully and how these perceptions may contribute to correspondence bias. Experiment 1 demonstrated that cues suggesting that essay assignment resulted from the target's purposeful action lead to correspondent inferences. When these cues were absent, observers' inferences were not correspondent. Experiment 2 demonstrated that observers are sensitive to cues emitted by the target (facial expressions of delight and disappointment) and that those cues' meaning depends on the context in which they take place. When the essay was freely chosen, the expression had little effect; observers judged that the essay accurately reflected the target's attitudes. When the essay assignment was constrained, observers used the expressions to discount the essay when judging the target's attitudes. We discuss the implications of these findings for the study of correspondent inferences and correspondence bias.
authors.affiliation: Princeton University.
authors.forename: J H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Fleming
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Darley
mesh_terms: D000028:Abortion, Induced; D001290:Attitude; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003463:Cues; D005149:Facial Expression; D006801:Humans; D012938:Social Perception