title: A comparison of cemented and cementless fixation with the Miller-Galante total knee arthroplasty.
abstract: This study demonstrates the comparability of cemented and cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty at short-term follow-up. While some differences in pain, limp, and support were noted, knee scores were equivalent. Roentgenographic analysis as well as implant retrieval studies demonstrate that porous ingrowth is a viable method of fixation of total knee components. Further long-term follow-up studies will be required to determine both the long-term clinical results and the longevity of the fixation interface.
authors.affiliation: Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois.
authors.forename: A G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Rosenberg
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Barden
authors.forename: J O
authors.initials: JO
authors.lastname: Galante
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002484:Cementation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D008297:Male; D008722:Methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D011859:Radiography