title: Joint angle signaling by muscle spindle receptors.
abstract: Nerve impulses were recorded from sensory fibers supplying the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles of anesthetized cats as the ankle joint was moved from one end of the flexion-extension axis to the other and back again in steps of 6-7 degrees. The rate of movement from one position to the next was 40 deg/s and each position was held for 16-18 s. Plots were made of receptor discharge frequency as a function of ankle joint angle during joint movement (dynamic input-output (I-O) functions) as well as 2 and 15 s after movement terminated (2 and 15 s static I-O functions). Only receptors with a sustained (5s) static response within the physiological range were studied. A total of 229 tibialis anterior receptors met this criterion, of which 11 were identified as tendon organs. One hundred and five soleus receptors were studied, of which 6 were tendon organs. Thus tendon organ activity accounted for only a small part of the muscle afferent signal under passive conditions. The spindle receptors in soleus and tibialis anterior divided the ankle flexion-extension range about equally between them, those in soleus signaling over the flexion half of the range and those in tibialis anterior over the extension half. At angles where the receptors in a particular muscle did not signal joint angle, the tendon of the muscle was observed to be slack. Thus the total muscle afferent discharge in a relaxed animal is high at one end of the range, declines progressively as the ankle is displaced to an intermediate position, and then increases again as the joint moves toward the opposite end of the range. The spindle receptors within an individual muscle were recruited rather early as the muscle came under tension so that over most of a muscle's signaling range joint angle could have been coded by changes in receptor discharge frequency but not by which spindle receptors were active. To evaluate the information signaled by individual muscle spindle receptors, the following measurements were made from plots of impulse frequency vs joint angle: dynamic response, defined as the frequency difference between the dynamic and 2 s static I-O functions during muscle lengthening; adaptation, defined as the frequency difference between the 2 and 15 s static I-O functions during muscle lengthening.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000818:Animals; D002415:Cats; D006614:Hindlimb; D007596:Joints / Q000502:physiology*; D007699:Kinesthesis / Q000502:physiology*; D009470:Muscle Spindles / Q000502:physiology*; D011434:Proprioception; D011999:Recruitment, Neurophysiological; D013710:Tendons / Q000294:innervation