A critical evaluation of the semantic-episodic distinction.
Tulving (1983, 1984) has recently claimed that a wide range of evidence supports the distinction between episodic and semantic memory systems. He has provided a list of features to describe the differences between the two systems and a set of experimental results to demonstrate the distinction. In this article, we present opposing evidence that invalidates many of the distinguishing features and contradicts interpretations of the supporting experiments. In addition, we argue that the question of whether there are two separate memory systems cannot be answered without a specific theory about the differences between the systems.
D000647:Amnesia / Q000523:psychology; D001185:Artificial Intelligence; D001921:Brain / Q000098:blood supply; D003657:Decision Making; D005071:Evoked Potentials; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory / Q000187:drug effects; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011932:Reading; D012039:Regional Blood Flow; D012106:Research; D012660:Semantics; D014796:Visual Perception