S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: evidence of the detection of affordances.
In choice reaction time, stimuli and responses in some combinations (e.g., based on spatial arrangement) are faster than in other combinations. To test whether motion toward a position yields faster responses at that position, a computer-generated square in front of one hand appeared to move either toward that hand or toward the other hand. Compatible responses (e.g., motion toward left hand/left response) were faster than incompatible responses, even when that opposed traditional positional compatibility. In Experiment 2, subjects responded to the same stimuli but with both hands left, right, or on the body midline. Medial responses were the fastest, showing that destination, rather than mere relative position, was a critical variable. It was suggested that spatial compatibility effects are not unique to position but apply to a variety of task situations, describable by J.J. Gibson's theory of affordances, in which he claims that one perceives the actions (e.g., catching) permitted in a situation.
Michaels
C F
CF
Lake Forest College, Illinois 60045.
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D005260:Female; D005556:Form Perception; D006801:Humans; D007088:Illusions; D008297:Male; D009039:Motion Perception; D009903:Optical Illusions; D009949:Orientation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time