Theoretical models for determining 222Rn and 220Rn progeny levels in Canadian underground U mines--a comparison with experimental data.
Use has been made of several theoretical models to predict radiation levels in underground U mines. The models used are the Evans model, the Thomas-Epps mine model, the isolated mine model, the mine tunnel with no air flow and the mine tunnel with air flow (Beckman and Holub). Calculations based on the above models have been extended to include 220Rn gas and its progeny, a common occurrence in some Canadian U mines. Theoretical predictions include 222Rn and 220Rn progenies working levels and concentrations, as well as some ratios of great practical interest. The main differences between the models are pointed out and comparison is made with experimental data gathered during the last 3 yr in several Canadian underground U mines. In general terms, the mine models reported in the literature and presented here are neither satisfactory nor clearly distinguishable for practical application on the basis of the experimental data so far collected. The reason for such lack of agreement lies mainly in the unrealistic assumptions on which the models are based. Compounded is the gross oversimplification of quite complex dynamic situations encountered in actual practice. Deficiencies inherent to the models are noted and suggestions to improve the applicability of mine models to practical situations are indicated.
Bigu
J
J
D000393:Air Pollutants / Q000032:analysis*; D000396:Air Pollutants, Radioactive / Q000032:analysis*; D001729:Bismuth / Q000032:analysis; D002170:Canada; D007854:Lead / Q000032:analysis; D008433:Mathematics; D008906:Mining; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011059:Polonium / Q000032:analysis; D011886:Radon / Q000032:analysis*; D017687:Radon Daughters; D014501:Uranium
D000393:Air Pollutants; D000396:Air Pollutants, Radioactive; D017687:Radon Daughters; D007854:Lead; D014501:Uranium; D011059:Polonium; D011886:Radon; D001729:Bismuth