title: [How to evaluate the immediate results of percutaneous transluminal angiography? Should pressure gradient, flow reserve or the minimal transluminal cross-sectional area be used?].
authors.forename: P W
authors.initials: PW
authors.lastname: Serruys
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Zijlstra
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Juillière
authors.forename: P J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: de Feyter
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: vd Brand
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Suryapranata
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Koning
authors.forename: J H
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Reiber
mesh_terms: D000790:Angiocardiography; D000800:Angioplasty, Balloon; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000628:therapy*; D005080:Exercise Test; D006801:Humans; D015425:Myocardial Reperfusion; D009204:Myocardial Revascularization
vernacular_title: Cómo valorar los resultados inmediatos de ACTP? Debe utilizarse gradiente de presión, la reserva de flujo o el área seccional transluminal minima?