Market responses to HMOs: price competition or rivalry?
Although competition for consumers is increasing in the health care sector, there is disagreement about whether it is resulting in cost containment, as its supporters have argued it would. In part this stems from a confusion between price competition, which under ideal circumstances leads to the production of services at the lowest possible cost, and nonprice competition--or rivalry--which under many circumstances will lead to increased costs. In this paper, I examine the evidence about the competitive response to the growing presence of health maintenance organizations in the health care marketplace. The available evidence suggests that providers are responding not with classical cost-containing price competition but, instead, with cost-increasing rivalry, characterized by increased expenditures to promote actual or perceived product differentiation.
McLaughlin
C G
CG
Department of Health Services Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2029.
D004465:Economic Competition; D004467:Economics; D004469:Economics, Hospital; D004526:Efficiency; D005249:Fees and Charges; D006279:Health Maintenance Organizations / Q000191:economics*; D006296:Health Services / Q000191:economics; D008389:Marketing of Health Services; D011050:Policy Making; D014481:United States