Will radiation control be by reason or regulation?
Following a very brief review of the development of our present radiation-protection philosophy, attention is directed to what the author sees as current problems. The only prognostication will be that at least certain of the problems outstanding or developing today will be among those that will have to be addressed in the coming four decades. For the past six decades, the major effort has been the development of the science and philosophy of radiation biology and its application to protection against radiation hazards, whether real or imagined. For three decades there has been public concern about radiation generally, the core of the problem being inadequate education of the public and the media on the subject. For a little over one decade, there has been rapidly developing growth of tort litigation generally, involving ionizing radiation in particular. These are the three major lines of attention in the radiation-protection area today; between two of them there are already some of the aspects of "the arena." Behind all three lies an overwhelming lack of understanding by, and education of, the public, which shows mostly in the public fetish for absolute safety which, of course, cannot be. These must be the major concerns of the radiation-protection community in the coming four decades.
D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence; D008452:Maximum Allowable Concentration; D011639:Public Opinion; D011640:Public Policy; D011832:Radiation Injuries / Q000266:history / Q000517:prevention & control; D011835:Radiation Protection; D012926:Social Control, Formal