title: Orthodontic bonding to porcelain--bond strength and refinishing.
abstract: Glazed porcelain surfaces are not amenable to resin penetration for orthodontic bonding. The aims of this study were to evaluate (1) the bond strengths of two orthodontic composite materials to treated porcelain surfaces, (2) the effect of thermocycling, and (3) the porcelain surfaces after refinishing. Sixty glazed porcelain disks were assigned to three surface treatment groups: Silane (S), roughening and silane (RS), and roughening (R). The acid-etched enamel surfaces of 20 extracted teeth served as a control group. Ten specimens in each group were bonded with either Concise or System 1. They were stored in water at 37 degrees C or thermocycled 8 degrees to 45 degrees C. Shear bond strength was tested with an Instron testing machine (0.05 cm/min). Analysis of variance showed that the four surface treatment groups and the two composite materials produced significantly different bond strengths (P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.05, respectively). The effect of thermocycling was not significant (P greater than 0.05). Acid-etched enamel/Concise produced the highest mean bond strength (17.4 MN/m2). This was significantly greater (P less than 0.05) than the mean bond strengths of S/Concise (11.1), RS/System 1 (8.6), RS/Concise (8.1), and enamel/System 1 (7.8). The latter four mean bond strengths in turn were significantly greater (P less than 0.05) than S/System 1 (2.5), R/Concise (2.1), and R/System 1 (1.8). Of the four refinishing systems evaluated, all produced smooth surfaces but were unable to reproduce a glazed appearance. Roughening of porcelain and the silane treatment achieve bond strengths that should be clinically successful.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
mesh_terms: D000269:Adhesives; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003775:Dental Polishing; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D008422:Materials Testing; D009970:Orthodontics
chemical_list: D000269:Adhesives; D003776:Dental Porcelain