The consequences of health service privatisation for equality and equity in health care in South Africa.
The trend towards the privatisation of health services in South Africa reflects a growing use of private sources of finance and the growing proportion of privately owned fee-for-service providers and facilities. Fee-for-service methods of reimbursement aggravate the geographical maldistribution of personnel and facilities, and the competition for scarce personnel resources aggravates the difference in the quality of the public and private services. Thus the growth in demand for these types of providers may be expected to increase inequality of access in these two respects. The potential expansion of medical scheme coverage is shown to be limited to well under 50% of the population, leaving the majority of the population without access to private sector health care. Even for members of the medical schemes, benefits are linked to income, thus clashing with the principle of equal care for equal need. The public funds needed to overcome financial obstacles to access to private providers could be more efficiently deployed by financing publicly owned and controlled health services directly. Taxation also offers the most equitable method of financing health services. Finally, attention is drawn to the dilemma resulting from the strengthening of the private health sector; while in the short term this can offer better care to more people on a racially non-discriminatory basis, in the long term, health care for the population as a whole may become more unequal and for those dependent on the public sector it may even deteriorate.
Price
M
M
Evaluation and Planning Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, England.
D044383:Black People; D003906:Developing Countries; D006291:Health Policy / Q000639:trends; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000639:trends*; D006801:Humans; D010067:Ownership / Q000639:trends*; D011057:Politics; D011332:Privatization / Q000639:trends*; D013019:South Africa