title: Comparative tensile strengths of brackets bonded to porcelain with orthodontic adhesive and porcelain repair systems.
abstract: The acceptance of simplified technical procedures that minimize clinical effort is exemplified by the popularity of direct bonding. This study (1) measured the comparative tensile bond strengths of brackets bonded directly in vitro to both glazed and deglazed porcelains by the use of five adhesive systems, and (2) recorded failure sites. System 1+, Enamelite 500, Isopast/Silanit, and Concise/Scotchprime proved to have strengths that should be acceptable clinically. Ultra-bond produced a bond that was significantly less in strength as compared with the other four systems. There was no significant difference in the bond of glazed and deglazed porcelains. Diamond polishing paste was better at restoring the porcelain surface to original smoothness in comparison with polishing stones. Irreversible damage to the porcelain surface may result from the bonding procedure.
authors.affiliation: Indiana University, Indianapolis.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Eustaquio
authors.forename: L D
authors.initials: LD
authors.lastname: Garner
authors.forename: B K
authors.initials: BK
authors.lastname: Moore
mesh_terms: D001840:Dental Bonding; D003738:Dental Cements; D003775:Dental Polishing; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D009967:Orthodontic Appliances; D013718:Tensile Strength
chemical_list: D003738:Dental Cements; D003776:Dental Porcelain