title: Transference: current concepts and controversies.
abstract: In this paper I have presented a brief outline of some of the more important issues regarding transference. To summarize I shall restate ten transference issues heretofore discussed: What should be included in the definition of transference? Should it be defined narrowly or broadly? In what ways can transference be usefully viewed in relation to reality? What merit is there in distinguishing the working alliance from transference? Should self and object transference be differentiated? Should transference neuroses be discriminated from transference reactions on the one hand and from transference psychoses on the other? In addition to sexual and aggressive transferences, should sexualized and aggressivitized transferences, respectively, be distinguished? How may transference be conceived of as a vehicle of cure and yet also as a resistance to cure? What is to be said for the relative merit of the "here and now" versus the "there and then?" What is the role of transference in relation to insight on the one hand and to the therapeutic object on the other? What are some of the basic issues in countertransference?
mesh_terms: D000374:Aggression; D003379:Countertransference; D006801:Humans; D009497:Neurotic Disorders / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy; D011618:Psychotic Disorders / Q000523:psychology; D012723:Sex; D009626:Terminology as Topic; D014167:Transference, Psychology