Comparison of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using monoclonal antibodies and a complement fixation test for cattle vaccinated and infected with Brucella abortus.
A competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using a monoclonal antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase MA(A) and a complement fixation test (CFT) were applied to sera collected over a two-year period from 60 cattle challenged with Brucella abortus strain 544. Forty-eight of the cattle were previously vaccinated with B. abortus strain 19 (S19) or B. abortus strain 45/20 (45/20). After challenge 33 of the cattle remained uninfected and nine of the 27 infected cattle showed aberrant reactions by the CFT. The performance of the MA(A) ELISA was as follows: after vaccination, the MA(A) ELISA, like the CFT, was unable to differentiate infected cattle from those recently vaccinated with S19. After challenge the MA(A) ELISA gave results comparable with the CFT for those cattle with aberrant reactions. For the non-infected cattle there was a similar number of weeks after challenge when both tests were negative. It is suggested that the main advantage of the MA(A) ELISA when compared with the CFT lies in its relatively simple test procedure.
D000818:Animals; D000907:Antibodies, Bacterial / Q000032:analysis*; D000911:Antibodies, Monoclonal; D001428:Bacterial Vaccines / Q000276:immunology; D002003:Brucella abortus / Q000276:immunology*; D002007:Brucellosis, Bovine / Q000276:immunology*; D002417:Cattle; D003168:Complement Fixation Tests; D004797:Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D013997:Time Factors
D000907:Antibodies, Bacterial; D000911:Antibodies, Monoclonal; D001428:Bacterial Vaccines