Trade-offs between hospital charges and patient outcomes.
The increasing cost of health care has focused attention on the trade-offs between health care expenditures and patient outcomes. In this study, hospital charges were contrasted with the health status at 1 year of follow-up of 549 patients admitted to a university hospital medical service. The findings related to short-term outcomes were consistent with those of other investigators: large expenditures were associated with patients who died in the hospital, especially those whose death was unexpected. Both 1-year survival and hospital charges were found to correlate with physician estimates of illness severity and prognosis at the time of admission. Patients considered not ill with a favorable prognosis had a mortality rate at 1 year of 3%, comprised 7% of the cohort and generated 2% of total charges. In contrast, patients considered severely ill with an unfavorable prognosis had a mortality rate of 65%, comprised 19% of the cohort and generated 30% of total charges. Nevertheless, 46% of the survivors in this latter group were considered to be functional and only mildly ill at 1 year of follow-up. The imprecision of clinical judgements at the time of admission in predicting long-term outcome argues for aggressive management of acutely hospitalized patients when there is any doubt about their prognosis.
D005249:Fees and Charges; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005102:Health Expenditures; D006760:Hospitalization / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D009026:Mortality; D009519:New York City; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Q000191:economics*; D011379:Prognosis; D012720:Severity of Illness Index