title: Comparison of four thermocycling techniques.
abstract: This investigation revealed no significant difference among the four thermocycling techniques. The use of a dye or an isotope was equally effective and penetrated the tooth/restoration interface to a similar degree. The extent of tracer penetration appeared to be independent of the dwell time in the thermal baths. All procedures involving thermal changes were more potent in demonstrating leakage than the noncycled method.
authors.forename: G A
authors.initials: GA
authors.lastname: Crim
authors.forename: M L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Swartz
authors.forename: R W
authors.initials: RW
authors.lastname: Phillips
mesh_terms: D000134:Acid Etching, Dental; D000180:Acrylic Resins; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate; D002132:Calcium Radioisotopes; D003188:Composite Resins; D003763:Dental Leakage / Q000175:diagnosis*; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent; D006801:Humans; D012394:Rosaniline Dyes; D013696:Temperature; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D000180:Acrylic Resins; D002132:Calcium Radioisotopes; D003188:Composite Resins; D012394:Rosaniline Dyes; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate