title: Characterization of the accessory cells involved in suppressor T cell induction.
abstract: The ability of UV-treated splenic adherent cells (SAC) to induce T cell-mediated immunity and suppressor T cells was analyzed in the 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl acetyl (NP) system. UV irradiation of 0.88 KJ/m2 decreased the capacity of NP-coupled SAC to induce delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses by about 50%. The ability of uncoupled UV-treated SAC to induce allogeneic DTH response was also imparied, indicating that UV-treated SAC are inefficient at inducing DTH in these systems. TS1 induction by UV-treated NP-SAC was evaluated TS1 induction by UV-treated NP-SAC was evaluated by using adherent cells that were subjected to the same dose of UV irradiation that impaired DTH induction. Intravenous administration of 10(3) or 10(4) UV-treated NP-coupled SAC induced TS1 cells with the same efficiency as non-UV-irradiated cells. The TS1 cells induced in this fashion were antigen specific. Furthermore, to establish that the antigen was not reprocessed by the host, I-J-mismatched, UV-treated NP-SAC were unable to induce TS1 cells. The population of antigen-presenting cells responsible for TS1 induction appear to express both I-A and I-J determinants. TS2 induction by UV-treated accessory cells was also analyzed. TSF1 inducer suppressor factor was pulsed onto graded numbers of either normal or UV-treated adherent cells. The same levels of antigen-specific suppression were induced with normal and UV-treated cells. Finally, TS3 induction by UV-treated NP-SAC was analyzed. UV-treated and normal NP-SAC (3 X 10(3] induced antigen-specific suppression of NP DTH responses. I-J-mismatched, UV-treated NP-SAC failed to induce suppression, suggesting that the hapten was not reprocessed by the host under these experimental conditions. The accessory cell population responsible for TS3 induction appears to express both I-A and I-J determinants. Thus, there are at least two functional distinctions between the antigen-presenting cells that induce immunity vs those that induce suppressor cells. First, UV treatment selectively impairs the antigen-presenting cells, which activate the positive limb of the immune response. Second, I-J determinants appear to be specifically associated with the SAC, which induce suppressor T cells. Although these criteria can be used to distinguish the accessory cells involved in suppressor cell pathways from those controlling helper T cell induction, there were no discernible phenotypic differences among the accessory cells that induce the TS1, TS2, and TS3 subsets.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Noma
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Usui
authors.forename: M E
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Dorf
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000938:Antigen-Presenting Cells / Q000145:classification* / Q000276:immunology / Q000528:radiation effects; D002448:Cell Adhesion; D004307:Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; D006241:Haptens / Q000008:administration & dosage; D006968:Hypersensitivity, Delayed / Q000276:immunology; D008213:Lymphocyte Activation / Q000528:radiation effects; D051379:Mice; D010641:Phenotype; D013154:Spleen / Q000166:cytology; D050378:T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory / Q000145:classification* / Q000276:immunology / Q000502:physiology; D014466:Ultraviolet Rays
chemical_list: D006241:Haptens