Human liver cytosolic epoxide hydrolases.
Human liver epoxide hydrolases were characterized by several criteria and a cytosolic cis-stilbene oxide hydrolase (cEHCSO) was purified to apparent homogeneity. Styrene oxide and five phenylmethyloxiranes were tested as substrates for human liver epoxide hydrolases. With microsomes activity was highest with trans-2-methylstyrene oxide, followed by styrene 7,8-oxide, cis-2-methylstyrene oxide, cis-1,2-dimethylstyrene oxide, trans-1,2-dimethylstyrene oxide and 2,2-dimethylstyrene oxide. With cytosol the same order was obtained for the first three substrates, whereas activity with 2,2-dimethylstyrene oxide was higher than with cis-1,2-dimethylstyrene oxide and no hydrolysis occurred with trans-1,2-dimethylstyrene oxide. Generally, activities were lower with cytosol than with microsomes. The isoelectric point for both microsomal styrene 7,8-oxide and cis-stilbene oxide hydrolyzing activity was 7.0, whereas cEHCSO had an isoelectric point of 9.2 and cytosolic trans-stilbene oxide hydrolase (cEHTSO) of 5.7. The cytosolic epoxide hydrolases could be separated by anion-exchange chromatography and gel filtration. The latter technique revealed a higher molecular mass for cEHCSO than for cEHTSO. Both cytosolic epoxide hydrolases showed higher activities at pH 7.4 than at pH 9.0, whereas the opposite was true for microsomal epoxide hydrolase. The effects of ethanol, methanol, tetrahydrofuran, acetonitrile, acetone and dimethylsulfoxide on microsomal epoxide hydrolase depended on the substrate tested, whereas both cytosolic enzymes were not at all, or only slightly, affected by these solvents. Effects of different enzyme modulators on microsomal epoxide hydrolase also depended on the substrates used. Trichloropropene oxide and styrene 7,8-oxide strongly inhibited cEHCSO whereas cEHTSO was moderately affected by these compounds. Immunochemical investigations revealed a close relationship between cEHCSO and rat liver microsomal, but not cytosolic, epoxide hydrolase. Interestingly, cEHTSO has no immunological relationship to rat microsomal, nor to rat cytosolic epoxide hydrolase. cEHTSO from human liver differed also from its counterpart in the rat in that it was only moderately affected by tetrahydrofuran, acetonitrile and trichloropropene oxide. Five steps were necessary to purify cEHCSO. The enzyme has a molecular mass (49 kDa) identical to that of rat liver microsomal epoxide hydrolase.
Schladt
L
L
Institut für Toxikologie, Universität Mainz, Federal Republic of Germany.
Thomas
H
H
Hartmann
R
R
Oesch
F
F
D000328:Adult; D000818:Animals; D002850:Chromatography, Gel; D002852:Chromatography, Ion Exchange; D003600:Cytosol / Q000201:enzymology*; D004591:Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel; D004851:Epoxide Hydrolases / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D004852:Epoxy Compounds / Q000378:metabolism; D006801:Humans; D007120:Immunochemistry; D007525:Isoelectric Focusing; D008099:Liver / Q000201:enzymology*; D008862:Microsomes, Liver / Q000201:enzymology; D051381:Rats; D013379:Substrate Specificity
D004852:Epoxy Compounds; C013690:styrene oxide; D004851:Epoxide Hydrolases