Evaluation of the retention of endodontic implants.
The study investigated the retentive strength of endodontic implants measured by forced removal (pull-out or push-out tests) as a function of implant design and cement type. Smooth-tapered, threaded, and an innovative porous-surfaced implant were evaluated. Specimens were cemented in single-rooted human teeth with five different cements: zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate, glass ionomer, silicophosphate, or AH-26. The results indicated superior retention for the threaded and porous-surfaced implants, and stronger retention with glass-ionomer and AH-26 cements.
Maniatopoulos
C
C
University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry, Ont., Canada.
Pilliar
R M
RM
Smith
D C
DC
D001729:Bismuth; D003738:Dental Cements; D003759:Dental Implantation, Endosseous, Endodontic / Q000379:methods*; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D004338:Drug Combinations; D004853:Epoxy Resins; D004867:Equipment Design; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D006801:Humans; D008709:Methenamine; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D011076:Polycarboxylate Cement; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials; D012823:Silicate Cement; D012834:Silver; D013499:Surface Properties; D014025:Titanium; D015036:Zinc Phosphate Cement
D003738:Dental Cements; D004338:Drug Combinations; D004853:Epoxy Resins; D005899:Glass Ionomer Cements; D011076:Polycarboxylate Cement; D012387:Root Canal Filling Materials; C036917:silicophosphate cement; D012823:Silicate Cement; D012834:Silver; C028044:epoxy resin AH-26; D015036:Zinc Phosphate Cement; D014025:Titanium; D008709:Methenamine; D001729:Bismuth