title: A comparison of chorionic villi sampling and amniocentesis: acceptability of procedure and maternal attachment to pregnancy.
abstract: Sixty-one women with high-risk pregnancies participated in a clinical trial comparing chorionic villi sampling and amniocentesis. They were assessed initially on five background measures and maternal attachment to the fetus, then were randomly assigned to either chorionic villi sampling or an amniocentesis group. Women were further assessed for maternal attachment three times during pregnancy. During the final assessment, those who were planning future pregnancies were asked which of the two procedures they would prefer. No differences between groups were found on any of the five background measures. All 31 women who considered future pregnancies indicated a preference for chorionic villi sampling, regardless of the procedure they underwent during the study. Women receiving chorionic villi sampling reported significantly greater attachment during the second trimester than did women receiving amniocentesis, who viewed themselves as being less attached than other pregnant women during this period. The findings were interpreted as evidence for attachment suppression among women undergoing amniocentesis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
authors.forename: J W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Spencer
authors.forename: D N
authors.initials: DN
authors.lastname: Cox
mesh_terms: D000649:Amniocentesis / Q000523:psychology*; D001290:Attitude; D015193:Chorionic Villi Sampling / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008425:Maternal Behavior; D009769:Object Attachment; D011247:Pregnancy / Q000523:psychology*