title: [Is the Gil-Vernet advancement procedure for reflux legitimate? Considerations apropos of 22 cases in adults and children].
abstract: We discuss 22 patients who have undergone surgical antireflux plasty with Gil-Vernet's technique. In 19 patients, success was obtained with an average follow-ip of 12 months. In 3 cases, a persistent reflux remains and the children have not been reoperated. This technique is very simple and has a number of advantages, such as bilateral simultaneous correction of reflux, without any lower ureteral dissection. Subsequent ureteral catheterisation is easy which is important for any further ureteroscopy. Nevertheless, a longer follow-up has to be studied to be sure of the reliability, of the technique in comparison with older but safe techniques such as Cohen's advancement.
authors.affiliation: Service d'Urologie, CHU, Poitiers.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Doré
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Aubert
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008722:Methods; D014718:Vesico-Ureteral Reflux / Q000601:surgery*
vernacular_title: L'anti-reflux par avancement selon Gil-Vernet est-il licite? Réflexions à propos de vingt-deux observations de l'adulte et de l'enfant.