Diagnostic utility of memory equipped transtelephonic monitors.
The diagnostic utility of memory-equipped transtelephonic electrocardiographic monitors was evaluated in a series of 31 patients referred for evaluation of unexplained syncope (16), presyncope (8), or palpitations (7). Previous nondiagnostic workups included 4 +/- 1 days (mean +/- standard error of the mean) of 24-hour Holter and/or in-hospital telemetric monitoring per patient. The duration of monitoring averaged 31 +/- 2 days per patient. Electrocardiographic recordings were made during a typical symptom episode in 9 of 31 (29%) patients, including 0 of 16 with syncope, 3 of 8 (37%) with presyncope, and 6 of 7 (86%) with palpitations (p less than .001). The probability of recording typical symptoms was strongly influenced by their previous frequency. Potentially causal arrhythmias were documented in 5 of 7 (71%) patients with palpitations, but in none of the other symptom subgroups (p less than .001). Monitoring led to changes in therapy in only two patients. During followup of 9 +/- 1 months, symptoms continued in 4 of 16 (25%) with syncope, 7 of 8 (87%) with presyncope, and 7 of 7 (100%) with palpitations (p = .001). The diagnostic utility of these devices thus appears to be low in patients with previously unexplained syncope or presyncope. The yield was high in those monitored for palpitations, which may be in part attributable to the greater frequency of symptoms observed in this group.
Schmidt
S B
SB
West Virginia University School of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Morgantown 26506.
Jain
A C
AC
D001145:Arrhythmias, Cardiac / Q000175:diagnosis*; D004562:Electrocardiography / Q000295:instrumentation*; D004566:Electrodes; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008991:Monitoring, Physiologic / Q000295:instrumentation*; D013686:Telemetry / Q000295:instrumentation*; D013689:Telephone