title: Are serine proteases involved in immune complex activation of neutrophils?
abstract: Soybean polypeptides and diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP) have been reported to inhibit neutrophil functions such as the oxidative burst, chemotaxis, and/or phagocytosis in response to soluble stimuli; these observations would be compatible with the involvement of an active serine protease in neutrophil stimulation. We have investigated the possibility of such involvement when particulate stimuli such as immune complexes are utilized. The depolarization of the neutrophils' membrane potential, one of the earliest indicators of stimulation, and superoxide production, which is detectable 30-45 sec later, were our indicators of neutrophil response to immune complexes. The neutrophils were equilibrated with, and after 5 min washed free of, up to 60 mM DFP, a potent covalent serine protease inhibitor. At DFP concentrations below 24 mM, such treatment did not perturb neutrophil activation as measured by either of the above parameters, nor did F- alone under comparable conditions. Additionally, the immune complex induced responses of neutrophils preincubated for 3 min with N-alpha-p-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethylketone (TLCK), L-1-tosylamido-2-phenyl-ethyl-chloromethylketone (TPCK), or phenyl-methyl-sulfonyl-fluoride (PMSF), covalent serine protease inhibitors which have, however, been shown to function in other capacities, e.g., as superoxide dismutases; 1 mM PMSF or 0.5 mM TLCK consistently reduced the observed membrane depolarization, one of the earliest consequences of neutrophil activation, by 20-30%, while 0.1 mM TLCK and 0.01 mM TPCK had little or no effect. The inhibition of superoxide production, a slightly later stimulus response, by PMSF, TLCK, and TPCK was more profound (50-75%); these compounds have, however, been shown to have activities other than serine protease inhibitors--for example, as superoxide dismutases. Since DFP is purely a serine protease inhibitor, and since the three other compounds do not affect depolarization (the earlier and superoxide independent event), our results indicate that active serine proteases do not appear to be necessary for immune-complex-initiated neutrophil stimulation. Other stimuli, which are known to activate neutrophils by different pathways, were not investigated.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biochemistry, Boston University School of Medicine, MA 02118.
authors.forename: D E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: Mark
authors.forename: K G
authors.initials: KG
authors.lastname: Lazzari
authors.forename: E R
authors.initials: ER
authors.lastname: Simons
mesh_terms: D000936:Antigen-Antibody Complex / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007531:Isoflurophate / Q000494:pharmacology; D008564:Membrane Potentials / Q000187:drug effects; D009504:Neutrophils / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D011480:Protease Inhibitors / Q000494:pharmacology; D012697:Serine Endopeptidases / Q000502:physiology*; D012969:Sodium Fluoride / Q000494:pharmacology
chemical_list: D000936:Antigen-Antibody Complex; D011480:Protease Inhibitors; D007531:Isoflurophate; D012969:Sodium Fluoride; D012697:Serine Endopeptidases