Effects of signaling inescapable shock on subsequent escape learning: implications for theories of coping and "learned helplessness".
The present experiments reveal that shuttle-escape performance deficits are eliminated when exteroceptive cues are paired with inescapable shock. Experiment 1 indicated that, as in instrumental control, a signal following inescapable shock eliminated later escape performance deficits. Subsequent experiments revealed that both forward and backward pairings between signals and inescapable shock attenuated performance deficits. However, the data also suggest that the impact of these temporal relations may be modulated by qualitative aspects of the cues because the effects of these relations depended upon whether an increase or decrease in illumination (Experiment 2) or a compound auditory cue (Experiment 4) was used. Preliminary evidence suggests that the ability of illumination cues to block escape learning deficits may be related to their to reduce contextual fear (Experiment 3). The implications of these data for conceptions of instrumental control and the role of fear in the etiology of effects of inescapable shock exposure are discussed.
Jackson
R L
RL
Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Arlington, 76019.
Minor
T R
TR
D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D000818:Animals; D001143:Arousal; D001362:Avoidance Learning; D003463:Cues; D004597:Electroshock; D004924:Escape Reaction; D005246:Feedback; D006380:Helplessness, Learned / Q000523:psychology*; D008297:Male; D051381:Rats; D011930:Reaction Time