title: A comparison of alternative theoretical approaches to smoking cessation and relapse.
abstract: Two theoretical approaches to smoking cessation were compared. Participants were randomly assigned either to (a) a traditional treatment program that used contingency contracting and that emphasized the necessity for absolute abstinence (AA) or to (b) a relapse-prevention (RP) treatment that focused on gradual acquisition of nonsmoking skills. It was hypothesized that participants in the RP treatment would be less successful initially but would have better maintenance skills and thus would relapse less during a 1-year follow-up period. Each program was evaluated in two formats: group-based treatment and self-help materials. Results indicated comparable 1-year abstinence rates for all treatments, although more participants dropped out of the self-help formats. Participants in the RP intervention were more likely to lapse sooner after quitting and were more likely to quit again during the 1-year maintenance period. Exploratory analyses of successful participants suggested that women were more successful in the RP program and that men had greater success with the AA approach.
authors.affiliation: Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, WA 98121.
authors.forename: S J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Curry
authors.forename: G A
authors.initials: GA
authors.lastname: Marlatt
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gordon
authors.forename: J S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Baer
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001521:Behavior Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011615:Psychotherapy, Group; D012008:Recurrence; D012648:Self Care; D012737:Sex Factors; D012907:Smoking / Q000628:therapy*