A model of force production that explains the lag between crossbridge attachment and force after electrical stimulation of striated muscle fibers.
Whereas the mechanical behavior of fully activated fibers can be explained by assuming that attached force-producing crossbridges exist in at least two configurations, one exerting more force than the other (Huxley A. F., and R. M. Simmons. 1971. Nature [Lond.]. 233:533-538), and the behavior of relaxed fibers can be explained by assuming a single population of weakly binding rapid-equilibrium crossbridges (Schoenberg, M. 1988. Biophys. J. 54:135-148), it has not been possible to explain the transition between rest and activation in these terms. The difficulty in explaining why, after electrical stimulation of resting intact frog skeletal muscle fibers at 1-5 degrees C, force development lags stiffness development by more than 15 ms has led a number of investigators to postulate additional crossbridge states. However, postulation of an additional crossbridge state will not explain the following three observations: (a) Although the lag between force and stiffness is very different after stimulation, during the redevelopment of force after an extended period of high velocity shortening, and during relaxation of a tetanus, nonetheless, the plots of force versus stiffness in each of these cases are approximately the same. (b) When the lag between stiffness and force during the rising phase of a twitch is changed nearly fourfold by changing temperature, again the plot of force versus stiffness remains essentially unchanged. (c) When a muscle fiber is subjected to a small quick length change, the rate constant for the isometric force recovery is faster when the length change is applied during the rising phase of a tenanus than when it is applied on the plateau. We have been able to explain all the above findings using a model for force production that is similar to the 1971 model of Huxley and Simmons, but which makes the additional assumption that the force-producing transition envisioned by them is a cooperative one, with the back rate constant of the force-producing transition decreasing as more crossbridges attach.
Bagni
M A
MA
Dipartimento di Scienze Fisiologiche, Universita degli Studi, Firenze, Italy.
Cecchi
G
G
Schoenberg
M
M
D000818:Animals; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D007700:Kinetics; D008433:Mathematics; D008954:Models, Biological; D009119:Muscle Contraction; D009132:Muscles / Q000502:physiology*; D011898:Ranidae; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013816:Thermodynamics