title: Subarachnoid hemorrhage and normal angiography: should the angiogram be reviewed by a second neuroradiologist?
abstract: In recent years there has been a tendency to abandon repeat cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) if the initial angiogram is normal because prognosis is said to be excellent. Our experience does not support such a conclusion. We report our experiences in 25 patients with SAH, who had a normal initial angiogram. Aneurysms were seen in five of 20 cases when angiography was repeated. On subsequent review of the initial angiograms, the aneurysm was apparent in four of the five cases. When these four initial angiograms were shown to a second observer, unaware of the results of the second study, three of the four aneurysms were correctly identified. We suggest that if, under strong clinical suspicion of SAH, the angiogram is reported as normal the study should be reviewed by a second neuro-radiologist before proceeding to repeat angiography.
authors.affiliation: Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Shuaib
authors.forename: M A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: R D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Johns
authors.forename: H A
authors.initials: HA
authors.lastname: Swanson
mesh_terms: D002533:Cerebral Angiography; D006801:Humans; D002532:Intracranial Aneurysm / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000209:etiology*; D013345:Subarachnoid Hemorrhage / Q000150:complications / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D013997:Time Factors; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed