Effect of chestwall removal on expiratory flow in dogs.
We studied the effect of chestwall removal on Flow-Volume (F-V) curves in anesthetized dogs, by applying suction at the airway opening. Pressure and volume ranges utilized were comparable to those by others in the past for studies of expiratory flow in canine models. It was found: 1) Expiratory flow became nil at residual volume (RV) in the intact animal. On the contrary, flow after chestwall removal continued below RV, until the lung reached its minimal volume (Vmin) which averaged 11 +/- 6% TLC or 50% RV. 2) At high lung volumes, flow, particularly peak flow of F-V curves, was greater before than after chestwall removal. Thus the chestwall has a bimodal effect on flow. At low lung volumes, particularly below RV, the chestwall inhibits expiratory flow, and chestwall removal always results in flow increase, such that the lung can empty until all airways are collapsed, down to a volume of about 50% RV. On the contrary, the chestwall facilitates expiratory flow at high lung volumes, particularly at peak flow. The bimodality of chestwall effect on expiratory flow is consistent with the well known directional reversal of chestwall elastic recoil as volume changes, being nil at chestwall resting volume (Vcwr), and directing inwards (thus helping expiration) above Vcwr, or outwards (thus inhibiting expiration) below this volume (12). In a hypothetical situation of no chestwall resistance, chestwall effect on flow would be nil at Vcwr. In our experimentation, we found that the volume where the chestwall had no effect on expiratory flow averaged 71% TLC, clearly higher than Vcwr (49% TLC). We attribute the difference to the chestwall resistance.
Minh
V D
VD
Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine Medical Center.
Lonky
S
S
Fairshter
R D
RD
Chiang
S T
ST
D000818:Animals; D004285:Dogs; D011312:Pressure; D012123:Pulmonary Ventilation; D013909:Thorax / Q000502:physiology*; D014109:Total Lung Capacity