Neural mechanisms of absolute tactile localization in monkeys.
Macaca nemestrina monkeys were trained to indicate the location of suprathreshold tactile stimuli delivered to the glabrous skin of either foot. The testing paradigm involved self-initiated trials (a bar press), followed by 10-Hz stimulation at one of six locations (e.g., on the distal phalanx of the second toe on the left foot), providing the opportunity for the animal to press one of six buttons located on a facing panel. The buttons were positioned on a picture of a monkey's feet at locations corresponding to the skin loci that were stimulated on different trials. If the animal first pressed the button corresponding to the position stimulated, liquid reward was delivered; responses to any other button terminated stimulation without reward, requiring initiation of another trial for the opportunity to receive reinforcement. The localization errors for normal monkeys were reliably greater along the mediolateral dimension of the foot than they were proximodistally. For example, stimulation of the tip of toe 4 elicited responses to the button at the tip of toe 2 on 25% of the trials, as compared with only 10% errors between the tip of toe 4 and the pad at the base of toe 4. Following unilateral interruption of the dorsal spinal columns at an upper thoracic level, the capacity for absolute tactile localization was unchanged over months of testing. The greater localization accuracy along the proximodistal axis of the foot remained after dorsal column transection. In order to evaluate neural substrates of localization by monkeys, single-neuron receptive field (RF) sizes and distributions within the first somatosensory (SI) cortex were examined to determine the overlap or separation of the representations of different points on glabrous skin. The sample of neurons that provided the RF data was obtained in previous investigations of unanesthetized, neuromuscularly blocked Macaca fascicularis monkeys. Analysis of RF overlap revealed that greater than 50% of cytoarchitectural area 1 units that responded to stimulation of one digit tip also responded to another digit or to the pad at the base of a digit. These large RFs seem poorly suited to subserve a high degree of spatial localization and are compatible with the frequent localization errors by the monkeys in the behavioral experiments. However, the area 1 RF data do not explain the tendency of these animals to exhibit better localization accuracy along the proximodistal axis than along the mediolateral axis of the volar foot.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Vierck
C J
CJ
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27514.
Favorov
O
O
Whitsel
B L
BL
D000818:Animals; D004193:Discrimination Learning / Q000502:physiology; D006614:Hindlimb / Q000294:innervation; D007699:Kinesthesis / Q000502:physiology*; D008254:Macaca nemestrina; D008465:Mechanoreceptors / Q000502:physiology*; D009434:Neural Pathways / Q000502:physiology; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D011601:Psychophysics; D012867:Skin / Q000294:innervation*; D013116:Spinal Cord / Q000502:physiology; D014110:Touch / Q000502:physiology*