Infant grating acuity is temporally tuned.
Studies of infant visual development have shown that acuity estimated with pattern visually evoked potential (VEP) techniques is higher than acuity estimated with preferential looking (PL) techniques. A major difference is that VEP stimuli are temporally modulated while PL stimuli are typically stationary. We measured PL acuity in 2-10-month-old infants for stationary gratings and for gratings phase alternating at 2.5, 7.5, 14 and 23 reversals/sec using a computer generated staircase method. The acuity functions were temporally tuned at 7.5 or 14 rev/sec for infants 3 months and older. Acuity for 7.5 and 14 rev/sec gratings was 0.5 to 1.0 octave higher than for stationary, 2.5 and 23 rev/sec gratings. When adults' grating acuity was measured foveally and 5 deg eccentrically, tuning occurred only for the eccentric targets, suggesting that the retinal area used by the infants to detect gratings acts like the adult perifovea. In a second experiment, VEP and PL acuity were both measured from the same infants using 14 reversals/sec gratings. The VEP/PL acuity difference was less for phase alternating gratings than for stationary gratings. The magnitude of the difference was age dependent, decreasing from 2 octaves at 2 months to 0.5 octave at 12 months. Even though the use of phase alternating gratings results in improved PL acuity, temporal modulation does not completely account for the difference between VEP and PL acuity.
Sokol
S
S
Department of Ophthalmology, Tufts New England Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111.
Moskowitz
A
A
McCormack
G
G
Augliere
R
R
D000328:Adult; D000375:Aging / Q000502:physiology; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D005556:Form Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors; D014792:Visual Acuity