title: [Continuous sedation for regional anesthesia with propofol (Disoprivan) and midazolam (Dormicum). A comparative study].
abstract: Propofol was compared to midazolam with regard to its quality as a sedative in regional anesthesia. 81 patients undergoing varicose-vein stripping under epidural anesthesia were divided into two groups: 39 were given propofol and 42 were given midazolam. Both groups were then subdivided into 3 subgroups. 30 min after epidural block, a bolus of propofol 1 mg/kg or midazolam 0.03 mg/kg was given followed by infusion of equipotent solutions: propofol 1.0, 1.5, or 2.0 mg/kg/h or midazolam 0.03, 0.045, 0.06 mg/kg/h. Continuous registration of blood pressure, respiratory rate, and end-expiratory pCO2 was carried out and blood gas analysis was performed every 30 min.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Clinically unimportant changes of circulatory and respiratory parameters were seen. Blood gas analyses showed hypercapnia greater than 50 mmHg in some patients. Brief apnea occurred after bolus propofol in 7.7% of cases and pain during injection in 66.6%. Restlessness: propofol 28.2%, midazolam 9.5%. Upper airway obstruction: propofol 30.8%, midazolam 57.1%. Recovery time after infusion ranged from 130 s with propofol to 26 min with midazolam. Postoperative evaluation included the following questions and responses: Sedation pleasant? propofol 97.5%, midazolam 100%. Sleep during surgery? propofol 94.8%, midazolam 83.5%. Prolonged tiredness? propofol 25.6%, midazolam 69%. Postoperative nausea? propofol 38.5%, midazolam 14.2%. Vomiting? propofol 17.9%, midazolam 11.9%. Our study showed that propofol is highly suitable as a sedative for regional anesthesia in spite of injection pain and frequent postoperative nausea. It is superior to midazolam because of the significantly shorter recovery time, providing improved control-lability and reduced posthypnotic sleep.
authors.affiliation: Institut für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum Minden.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Dertwinkel
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Nolte
mesh_terms: D000765:Anesthesia, Conduction; D006439:Hemodynamics / Q000187:drug effects; D006801:Humans; D006993:Hypnotics and Sedatives / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D007262:Infusions, Intravenous; D008874:Midazolam / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D010636:Phenols / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D011229:Preanesthetic Medication; D015742:Propofol
chemical_list: D006993:Hypnotics and Sedatives; D010636:Phenols; D008874:Midazolam; D015742:Propofol
vernacular_title: Kontinuierliche Sedierung zur Regionalanaesthesie mit Propofol (Disoprivan) und Midazolam (Dormicum). Ein Vergleich.