title: Proven and nonproven facts in knee arthroplasty. Results with the semiconstrained GSB-prosthesis.
abstract: The great number of knee-replacement systems makes a comparative study difficult. Even more confusing are the different criteria used for the evaluation of the results. After a critical review of what can be taken as proven facts, our own experience with the semiconstrained GSB-III knee prosthesis is critically analyzed. The survivorship method is used, presenting the cumulative success rate and analyzing the reasons for the failure rates. We feel that all authors presenting results of knee arthroplasty should adopt this method, using the same or at least comparable evaluation sheets (for instance, that of ERASS). Moreover, more attention should be given to bone dynamics in a prospective study using modern technology (CT densitometry). This will help to detect possible factors responsible for the failure of knee arthroplasty and possibly to prevent failure with medication.
authors.affiliation: Klinik Willhelm Schulthess, Zürich.
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Gschwend
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Ivosević-Radovanović
mesh_terms: D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000502:physiology; D007720:Knee Prosthesis / Q000266:history; D009068:Movement; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure