title: [Review of statistical procedures for determining the equivalency of two treatments].
abstract: The absence of a significant difference in a classical efficacy trial testing the null hypothesis of equality between N and S does not allow us to conclude that the treatments are equivalent. Testing the null hypothesis of N not equivalent to S requires: specifying the definition of "equivalence" by choosing delta L, the upper allowable value of the actual difference between two equivalent treatments. The appropriate statistic D which evaluates the difference between N and S, has a non central distribution under the null hypothesis of inequivalence (Ko:[E(D)] greater than or equal to delta L, two-sided test). Under the null hypothesis for a two-sided test, parameters of noncentral distribution have to be estimated, and the critical p-value is obtained using some approximation. Confidence interval of the true difference delta can also provide a decision rule. Specific calculation of the minimum number of subjects is required when designing an equivalence trial.
authors.affiliation: Unité de recherche sur l'épidémiologie des cancers (U. 287), Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Com-Nougue
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Rodary
mesh_terms: D000959:Antihypertensive Agents / Q000493:pharmacokinetics; D006801:Humans; D011336:Probability; D013223:Statistics as Topic; D013810:Therapeutic Equivalency
chemical_list: D000959:Antihypertensive Agents
vernacular_title: Revue des procédures statistiques pour mettre en évidence l'équivalence de deux traitements.