One lung anaesthesia. Cardiovascular and respiratory function compared during conventional ventilation and high frequency jet ventilation.
Ten patients about to undergo left-sided thoracotomy for carcinoma of the lung were entered into a crossover trial to compare cardiovascular and respiratory function during high frequency jet ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation for one lung anaesthesia. All patients were anaesthetised with a standard technique using double lumen tubes and placed in the lateral position with the left chest open. The results showed no significant differences with regard to ventilation sequence but one lung high frequency jet ventilation gave higher values than one lung conventional ventilation for shunt (p less than 0.01) and positive end expiratory pressure (p less than 0.05) and lower peak inflation pressure values (p less than 0.01). There were no significant differences in cardiac output, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, arterial carbon dioxide or available oxygen. Surgical conditions were satisfactory during both methods of ventilation and satisfactory gas exchange occurred. It was, however, more difficult to assess adequacy of ventilation during high frequency jet ventilation and the routine use of this method of ventilation is not recommended during one lung anaesthesia.
Jenkins
J
J
City Hospital, Edinburgh.
Cameron
E W
EW
Milne
A C
AC
Hunter
R M
RM
D000769:Anesthesia, Inhalation / Q000379:methods*; D002283:Carcinoma, Bronchogenic / Q000601:surgery; D006439:Hemodynamics; D006611:High-Frequency Jet Ventilation; D006801:Humans; D007385:Intermittent Positive-Pressure Ventilation; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery; D011175:Positive-Pressure Respiration; D012129:Respiratory Function Tests