Pericardial heterografts: why do these valves fail?
Eighteen explanted pericardial heterografts were studied (16 standard Ionescu-Shiley, one Hancock, and one Mitroflow). Regurgitation was the reason given for explantation of all the Ionescu-Shiley valves. The other two valves were removed for technical reasons. All the Ionescu-Shiley valves had commissural tears and there was concomitant gross calcification in 10 of the 16 valves. In addition, an apparent increase in cusp area had caused "leaflet sagging". The explanted leaflets were thicker and stiffer than leaflets from an unimplanted valve. These features were confirmed directly with an animal model of subcutaneous implantation. Examination with an electron microscope revealed that these changes in mechanical properties seemed to be linked to fiber separation and infiltration by an amorphous proteinlike matrix. The durability of the glutaraldehyde-fixed pericardium depended on a number of factors. Early and midterm failure appeared to be stress induced. Predisposition to high mechanical stresses near the stent was exacerbated by the changes induced by the host environment. This problem was aggravated further in the Ionescu-Shiley valves by stress concentrations around the hole associated with the holding suture. In the long term, collagen disruption associated with leaflet flexure was followed by secondary calcification at the boundary between the intact and disrupted material.
Trowbridge
E A
EA
Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, University of Sheffield, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, England.
Lawford
P V
PV
Crofts
C E
CE
Roberts
K M
KM
D001021:Aortic Valve; D001705:Bioprosthesis; D006350:Heart Valve Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D008854:Microscopy, Electron; D008875:Middle Aged; D008943:Mitral Valve; D010496:Pericardium / Q000648:ultrastructure; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D012086:Reoperation; D013314:Stress, Mechanical