title: Chordomas: MR imaging.
abstract: Twenty histologically verified intracranial and upper cervical chordomas were retrospectively studied with both magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT), and the advantages of each modality were compared with regard to three criteria: detection of tumor, delineation of extent of tumor, and characterization of tumor. MR imaging and CT were equivalent in permitting the detection of chordomas. MR imaging was considerably better in delineating the full extent of the tumor, which would influence establishment of treatment. MR imaging also provided a degree of histologic specificity that would be useful in prognosis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University of California School of Medicine, San Francisco.
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Sze
authors.forename: L S
authors.initials: LS
authors.lastname: Uichanco
authors.forename: M N
authors.initials: MN
authors.lastname: Brant-Zawadzki
authors.forename: R L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Davis
authors.forename: P H
authors.initials: PH
authors.lastname: Gutin
authors.forename: C B
authors.initials: CB
authors.lastname: Wilson
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Norman
authors.forename: T H
authors.initials: TH
authors.lastname: Newton
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002574:Cervical Vertebrae / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology*; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D002817:Chordoma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011859:Radiography; D012888:Skull Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D013125:Spinal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging