Reduction of urinary incontinence in nursing homes: does it reduce or increase costs?
Labor and supply costs associated with the care of urinary incontinent patients in three nursing homes were measured. First, normal nursing home changing patterns and their associated costs were measured. Second, the costs were documented when patients were checked by research staff and changed on an hourly basis as needed. Nursing home staff changed patients significantly less frequently than patient voiding as detected by the hourly checking system. Thus, cost of incontinence during the hourly checking condition ($3.35) per 12-hour patient-day was significantly higher than the cost normally incurred in nursing homes ($1.52) per 12-hour patient-day. The cost of an incontinence rehabilitation program, which significantly reduced incontinence episodes, was contrasted to the cost of incontinence as measured under both of the previous conditions. The rehabilitation program produced significant labor and supply savings only when compared with the hourly checking and changing system. Maintaining patients in a more continent condition costs significantly more than the direct incontinence cost normally incurred by the nursing home. Quality of life and other second-order benefits must be considered if continence rehabilitation is to be judged cost-effective.
Schnelle
J F
JF
Middle Tennessee State University, Psychology Department, Murfreesboro 37132.
Sowell
V A
VA
Hu
T W
TW
Traughber
B
B
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D004180:Direct Service Costs; D006801:Humans; D009735:Nursing Homes / Q000191:economics*; D014549:Urinary Incontinence / Q000191:economics* / Q000534:rehabilitation