Addendum to "Summation in the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes)".
Rumbaugh, Savage-Rumbaugh, and Hegel (1987) reported that two chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) could select, with better than 90% accuracy, the greater of two paired quantities of chocolate chips. In that study, no one quantity of chocolates (from 0 through 5) was used in both pairs on a given trial. We investigated the effect of having one quantity in common (CQ) in both pairs. Whether the other quantities (OQs) of chocolates were both less than or greater than the CQ, summation still occurred. Accuracy was primarily a function of the ratios of sums to be differentiated. This finding substantiated the earlier conclusion that summation was based on both quantities of each pair and not on some simpler process such as the avoidance of the tray with the smallest single amount or selection of the tray with the single largest amount.
Rumbaugh
D M
DM
Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta 30303.
Savage-Rumbaugh
E S
ES
Pate
J L
JL
D000818:Animals; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D007858:Learning; D008433:Mathematics; D002679:Pan troglodytes