title: [A comparison of manual methods and enterotube II (Roche) for the identification of gram-negative enteric bacteria isolated from feces].
abstract: The Enterotube II and classic manual methods were used in parallel to identify 100 members of the enteric bacteria isolated from feces culture. Among these isolated bacteria Shigella, Salmonella and E. coli were found 34%, 25%, 22% respectively. The Enterotube II and classic manual methods gave the same results for identification of Salmonella and Shigella. The Enterotube II correctly identified 98% of all gram negative enteric bacteria. Other advantages and disadvantages of these methods are discussed in our study.
authors.affiliation: Hacettepe Universitesi, Tip Fakültesi, Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dali Oğretim Görevlisi.
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Hasçelik
mesh_terms: D001431:Bacteriological Techniques; D004926:Escherichia coli / Q000302:isolation & purification; D005243:Feces / Q000382:microbiology*; D006090:Gram-Negative Bacteria / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D006801:Humans; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012475:Salmonella / Q000302:isolation & purification; D012760:Shigella / Q000302:isolation & purification
vernacular_title: Gaitadan izole edilen gram negatif enterik bakterilerin manuel yöntem ve Enterotube II (Roche) ile karşilaştirilmasi.