Notes on public protection against hazards and nuisances: the Israeli experience.
Scientific, detailed regulations for the abatement of noise, odour and air pollutants did not prove very successful; Israel reverted to the Subjective norm of 'disturbing'. Courts proved more adaptive to change than legislators, and made use of those regulations to shift the onus of proof in keeping balance between sanity and development.
Talgam
M
M
District Court of Tel Aviv, Israel.
D004787:Environmental Pollution / Q000032:analysis / Q000517:prevention & control*; D007557:Israel; D007878:Legislation as Topic; D009622:Noise / Q000517:prevention & control