Access to health care and equal protection of the law: the need for a new heightened scrutiny.
Proposals to reduce national expenditures for health care under Medicare and other programs raise questions about the limits on legislative power to distribute health care benefits. The constitutional guarantee of equal protection has been a weak source of protection for the sick, largely because they fail to qualify for special scrutiny under traditional equal protection analysis. Recent decisions of the United States Supreme Court suggest that the Justices seek a newer, more flexible approach to reviewing claims of unequal protection. This Article examines the application of the equal protection guarantee to health-related claims. It argues that traditional equal protection analysis is too rigid and newer rationality review too imprecise to provide just eligibility determinations. The Article concludes that courts should subject claims of unequal protection in the health care context to heightened scrutiny, as health care plays a special role in assuring equality of opportunity.
Mariner
W K
WK
Boston University Schools of Medicine and Public Health.
D035082:Federal Government; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D033222:Judicial Role; D008484:Medicaid / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011287:Prejudice; D040841:Resource Allocation; D012935:Social Justice; D035521:Supreme Court Decisions; D014481:United States; D035862:Vulnerable Populations