title: Aortic valve replacement with the Starr-Edwards prosthesis: a comparison of the first and second decades of follow-up.
abstract: There are few prostheses in current use that allow 20-year follow-up. This report compares the rates of valve-related complications during the first and second decades following aortic valve replacement with the Silastic ball prosthesis. (table; see text) Valve-related complication rates with this prosthesis have been low overall. Performance characteristics of this valve have remained stable through the second decade of follow-up. These results should be used as the standard in the evaluation of long-term results with other more recently introduced mechanical and tissue valves.
authors.affiliation: Heart Institute, St. Vincent Hospital and Medical Center, Portland, OR.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Cobanoglu
authors.forename: C L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Fessler
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Guvendik
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Grunkemeier
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Starr
mesh_terms: D001021:Aortic Valve; D004696:Endocarditis / Q000453:epidemiology; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006350:Heart Valve Prosthesis / Q000009:adverse effects; D006470:Hemorrhage / Q000453:epidemiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011379:Prognosis; D012086:Reoperation; D013923:Thromboembolism / Q000453:epidemiology