title: Comparison of lead dislodgment and pocket infection rates after pacemaker implantation in the operating room versus the catheterization laboratory.
abstract: To assess and compare the rates of lead dislodgment and pocket infection in patients having procedures performed in the operating room versus those performed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, we reviewed the records of 85 adult patients who underwent 88 procedures, all performed by one surgical team and having complete follow-ups at our institution from October 8, 1979, through November 7, 1986. Forty-five patients underwent 46 procedures in the operating room, and 40 patients underwent 42 procedures in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. There was one instance of ventricular lead dislodgment noted among the 48 leads implanted in the operating room and one instance of ventricular lead dislodgment among the 58 leads implanted in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. No instances of atrial lead dislodgment were noted. No instances of pocket infection were noted among the 46 procedures performed in the operating room or in the 42 procedures performed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. We conclude that pacemaker implantation can be performed with equivalent safety and effectiveness in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and in the operating room.
authors: Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425.
authors: G B
authors: GB
authors: Miller
authors: R B
authors: RB
authors: Leman
authors: J M
authors: JM
authors: Kratz
authors: P C
authors: PC
authors: Gillette
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D006328:Cardiac Catheterization; D004567:Electrodes, Implanted; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D009873:Operating Rooms; D010138:Pacemaker, Artificial; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection / Q000453:epidemiology*