title: Factors associated with the quality of laboratory performance in the United Kingdom external quality assessment scheme for serum growth hormone.
abstract: A search was made for associations between poor performance in the UK External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS) for serum growth hormone (GH), and a range of factors including assay method, laboratory workload and staffing, and Internal Quality Control (IQC) procedures. On the basis of the factors identified as being associated with poor performance we recommend the following. 1. Laboratories using RIA for GH should routinely analyse samples at two dilutions and report a mean result. 2. The use of 125I-GH which is 5 or more weeks old should be avoided. Tracer should also be chromatographed to remove aggregate before use. 3. Laboratories using RIA should avoid using a standard curve which covers too wide a range concentration; a curve midpoint (ie GH concentration to reduce the zero standard binding by 50%) of about 8 mU/l or less is probably acceptable. 4. It should be noted that high workloads present a risk of some loss in quality of responsible for checking IQC data. 6. Laboratories which do not have the resources to maintain fully their own RIA as outlined above should carefully consider use of an unbiased, precise IRMA. The UK EQAS has identified two assays (Boots-Celltech Sucrosep, NETRIA) that appear to meet these criteria [2]. The above observations may also be relevant to immunoassays for other peptide hormones.
authors: UK External Quality Assessment Schemes for Peptide Hormones and Related Substances, University of Edinburgh, UK.
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Seth
authors: I
authors: I
authors: Hanning
mesh_terms: D006133:Growth Substances / Q000097:blood*; D007753:Laboratories / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000592:standards*; D011786:Quality Control; D011863:Radioimmunoassay; D012307:Risk Factors; D006113:United Kingdom
chemical_list: D006133:Growth Substances