title: Writing about psychoanalysis: II. Analysts who write, patients who read.
abstract: When we make a decision to lecture, or to write for publication, we have begun an activity that will affect every one of our patients. If they attend our lectures, or read our published works, they cannot help being influenced. Even if they do not, they will have some reaction to the focusing of our interest on particular phases of the analysis. This will be true whether or not we intend to present clinical material. These considerations inevitably affect the analyst himself, sometimes inhibiting his writing altogether, sometimes constricting its scope, or worst of all, degrading its quality. The analyst's writing is also almost certain to influence whether and with what success his patient may choose to write. Lest these considerations suggest that we avoid writing altogether, I emphasize that such a sacrifice is by no means desirable or necessary. Problems of discretion will arise, and may in some cases be virtually insoluble; but there are ways of writing that can overcome most such objections. The analyst's interest in writing should be recognized and its effects, if any, brought into the analysis; so long as the writing itself is done with due regard to the conduct of the analysis and the welfare of the patient, it need have no adverse effects on either.
authors.forename: M H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Stein
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D011572:Psychoanalysis; D011575:Psychoanalytic Therapy; D013060:Speech; D014167:Transference, Psychology; D014956:Writing