Specific versus placebo effects in biofeedback: some brief back-to-basics considerations.
Following the semantic complexities raised in earlier papers, this paper seeks to return to some of the more basic considerations arising from the preceding discussion. A critical part of the context of that discussion is the increasingly important issue of accountability. In this context, the citing of supportive studies is not enough; one must also be able to justify the logical relevance of those studies. The discussion therefore turns on the logic of treatment evaluation, which must be treated as objectively as possible. Also critical is the distinction between the question of whether an effect is present and the question of what the source of that question might be. In the quest for treatment evaluation, only the former question is important. However, this quest is one that is in the interest of researchers, clinicians, and consumers, for all of whom only the facts will do.
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J J
JJ
Furedy
D
D
Shulhan
D001676:Biofeedback, Psychology; D005246:Feedback; D006801:Humans; D008128:Logic; D010919:Placebos; D012107:Research Design
D010919:Placebos