Properties of functionally identified nociceptive and nonnociceptive facial primary afferents and presynaptic excitability changes induced in their brain stem endings by raphe and orofacial stimuli in cats.
The activity of 221 single primary afferent units was recorded extracellularly in the trigeminal (V) ganglion of chloralose-anaesthetized cats to examine the receptive field properties of nonnociceptive and nociceptive cutaneous afferents and the effect of conditioning stimulation of the raphe system and orofacial afferents on the antidromic excitability of their brain stem endings in V subnucleus caudalis. In addition to slowly adapting and rapidly adapting low-threshold mechanosensitive afferents, we functionally identified three classes of cutaneous nociceptive afferents: these included A-delta high-threshold mechanoreceptive afferents (A-delta HTMs), C-fiber high-threshold mechanoreceptive afferents (C-HTMs), and C-polymodal nociceptive afferents (CPNs). Most of the CPNs could be activated by light tactile stimuli as well as by heavy pressure and pinch and noxious radiant heat applied to their mechanoreceptive field which usually involved a localized spot (approximately 1 mm in diameter) of skin. In contrast, the C-HTMs and A-delta HTMs could not be activated by radiant heat stimuli although some did show sensitization which was also a feature of the CPNs; they did respond to noxious mechanical stimulation of a localized area of skin. We noted that orofacial conditioning stimulation could produce an increase in antidromic excitability which was considered a reflection of primary afferent depolarization (PAD) in both nociceptive and nonnociceptive afferents innervating the cat's facial skin; nonnoxious mechanical stimuli and electrical stimuli were particularly effective in the low-threshold mechanosensitive afferents and noxious mechanical and high-intensity electrical stimuli were especially effective in the cutaneous nociceptive afferents. Raphe conditioning stimulation also was very effective in inducing PAD in these nociceptive afferents; however, the raphe conditioning effects were not limited to these nociceptive afferents since PAD was also frequently demonstrated in the low-threshold mechanosensitive afferents.
Hu
J W
JW
Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Canada.
Sessle
B J
BJ
D000818:Animals; D001933:Brain Stem / Q000502:physiology*; D002415:Cats; D003213:Conditioning, Psychological / Q000502:physiology; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D005071:Evoked Potentials; D005154:Facial Nerve / Q000502:physiology*; D008465:Mechanoreceptors / Q000502:physiology*; D009411:Nerve Endings / Q000502:physiology; D009475:Neurons, Afferent / Q000502:physiology*; D009619:Nociceptors / Q000502:physiology*; D011903:Raphe Nuclei / Q000502:physiology*; D012684:Sensory Thresholds; D012867:Skin / Q000294:innervation; D013569:Synapses / Q000502:physiology