Profile of denials of durable medical equipment for SCI patients by third party payers.
The difficulty in obtaining approval for payment of durable medical equipment by third party payers has impeded the rehabilitation program and discharge planning of many spinal cord patients throughout the country for many years. To gain some insight as to the number and level of patients affected, the kinds of equipment denied, the reasons given for the denial, which third party payers were mostly involved and how the patient and his/her family managed to cope or resolve this problem, a survey was undertaken. Letters were sent to 259 members of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) asking them to list representative cases where requests for equipment deemed necessary were denied. Twenty-eight responses from different institutions were received from sixteen states describing 110 patients and 180 pieces of durable medical equipment denied in 1984 and 1985. Manual wheelchairs, motorized wheelchairs, shower/commode chairs, and environmental control units were the four most common equipment items denied by the third party payers. Government agencies ie., Medicaid, Medicare, Vocational Rehabilitation Departments and State Crippled Children's Services were the most frequent deniers, comprising 54% of the total sample. They were followed by private insurance (31%) and Workman's Compensation (3%). By far, the two most common reasons given for denials were: it was not covered by the insurance policy (38%) and it was not medically necessary (30%). Ninety (90) pieces of equipment (50%) were eventually obtained, most often by charity, or through the patient's family resources.
Donovan
W H
WH
Institute of Rehabilitation and Research, Houston, Texas 77030.
Carter
R E
RE
Wilkerson
M A
MA
D003625:Data Collection; D004389:Durable Medical Equipment / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D007345:Insurance Claim Review; D007349:Insurance, Health, Reimbursement; D013119:Spinal Cord Injuries / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D014481:United States