Clinical efficacy of dental radiography in the detection of dental caries and periodontal diseases.
This article reports the ability of dental radiographs to correctly detect evidence of dental caries and periodontal disease (sensitivity) and to correctly establish the absence of these diseases (specificity). The analysis used a unique data set that was collected as part of the Veterans Administration Dental Longitudinal Study in Boston. Periapical, panoramic, and posterior bitewing radiographs were independently compared with a consensus radiographic standard of all three radiographs read simultaneously. Findings showed that the sensitivities of all three radiographs to detect dental caries were lower than expected, at approximately 60%, whereas the sensitivities to detect evidence of periodontal disease averaged approximately 85%. Panoramic radiographs were substantially less sensitive for detecting dental caries than periapical and posterior bitewing radiographs, but no difference between these modalities was observed in the analysis of sensitivity to periodontal disease. The proportion of false-negative and false-positive readings from dental radiographs was substantial and requires further investigation.
Douglass
C W
CW
Valachovic
R W
RW
Wijesinha
A
A
Chauncey
H H
HH
Kapur
K K
KK
McNeil
B J
BJ
D000328:Adult; D003731:Dental Caries / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D006801:Humans; D008722:Methods; D010510:Periodontal Diseases / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011862:Radiography, Panoramic; D013223:Statistics as Topic