title: Bionator treatment in Class II, division 1.
abstract: Twenty cases treated with a Bionator followed by fixed appliance therapy are compared to an untreated sample and a group treated with fixed appliances only. The most notable differences in Bionator effects are increased vertical dimension and mandibular plane angle. The first appliance used, whether Bionator or fixed, produced similar changes.
authors.forename: G A
authors.initials: GA
authors.lastname: Bolmgren
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Moshiri
mesh_terms: D000202:Activator Appliances; D000293:Adolescent; D002508:Cephalometry; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008310:Malocclusion / Q000628:therapy*; D008312:Malocclusion, Angle Class II / Q000473:pathology / Q000628:therapy*; D009967:Orthodontic Appliances; D009968:Orthodontic Appliances, Removable