title: Balancing the risks of planned cesarean section and trial of vaginal delivery for the mature, selected, singleton breech presentation.
abstract: The experience of mature, singleton, vaginal breech delivery over the last decade in our hospital is reviewed. This constitutes the largest series of breech delivery reported for over twelve years. Unlike all but two previous reports, we analyze our results by management policy; elective cesarean section, trial of vaginal breech delivery and cesarean section as soon as the diagnosis of breech delivery was made on labor ('expedite' cesarean operations). Six intrapartum or neonatal deaths occurred among 613 patients selected for trial of vaginal delivery--a rate of one per cent. There were none following 217 elective or 69 expedite cesarean sections. A detailed review of the literature over the last decade confirms that trial of vaginal delivery is more dangerous to the fetus and results in about one perinatal death of a normally formed infant in 200 deliveries. Apgar scores were slightly lower following trial of vaginal delivery and there were more irritable or injured babies in this group. The last intrapartum or neonatal death occurred in 1981. However, the elective cesarean section rate has increased from 14 to 33 per cent over this time period. Similarly the rate of failed trial of vaginal breech delivery has increased from 15 to 31 per cent. The proportion of failed trials was highest where the fetus was large but clinicians were poor at estimating fetal weight. Decision theory is used to examine the maternal utility of trial of vaginal breech delivery versus elective cesarean section when the intrapartum cesarean rate rises to these levels. It is shown that, from the point of view of maternal mortality and morbidity in the current pregnancy, trial of vaginal delivery maybe the more dangerous maternal option. Thus a low threshold for cesarean section in labor leads to greater fetal safety at the mother's expense. It is nevertheless concluded that maternal attitude and the long-term effects of a uterine scar should be considered in the final decision.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, U.K.
authors.forename: F F
authors.initials: FF
authors.lastname: Songane
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Thobani
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Malik
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Bingham
authors.forename: R J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Lilford
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000767:Anesthesia, Epidural; D000773:Anesthesia, Obstetrical; D001946:Breech Presentation; D002585:Cesarean Section; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008423:Maternal Age; D011247:Pregnancy; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors; D014219:Trial of Labor