title: Implication of defamation for dental educators.
abstract: Recent court decisions have indicated that in dealing with their students and colleagues, faculty must balance academic freedom and the individual right of fair consideration. It is also important for faculty and administrators to distinguish between decision-making procedures and criteria. It is quite clear from two recent United States Supreme Court cases that subjective evaluation by professional judgment is permissible as long as standard procedures of procedural due process are followed. In short, courts are more likely to review the application of the criteria than their substance.
mesh_terms: D002961:Civil Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003219:Confidentiality / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005179:Faculty, Dental; D006801:Humans; D007351:Insurance, Liability; D012308:Risk Management / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D013335:Students, Dental; D014481:United States