Test of the neurolinguistic programming hypothesis that eye-movements relate to processing imagery.
Bandler and Grinder's hypothesis that eye-movements reflect sensory processing was examined. 28 volunteers first memorized and then recalled visual, auditory, and kinesthetic stimuli. Changes in eye-positions during recall were videotaped and categorized by two raters into positions hypothesized by Bandler and Grinder's model to represent visual, auditory, and kinesthetic recall. Planned contrast analyses suggested that visual stimulus items, when recalled, elicited significantly more upward eye-positions and stares than auditory and kinesthetic items. Auditory and kinesthetic items, however, did not elicit more changes in eye-position hypothesized by the model to represent auditory and kinesthetic recall, respectively.
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D001307:Auditory Perception; D005133:Eye Movements; D005260:Female; D005556:Form Perception; D006801:Humans; D007699:Kinesthesis; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D011939:Mental Recall; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual