Explaining discrepancies between longitudinal and cross-sectional models.
Data from longitudinal studies may be analyzed both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Discrepancies between estimates obtained from these analyses pose questions about the validity of cross-sectional estimates of change. In some cases these discrepancies are the result of period effects, cohort effects, or selective dropout. In others, they are the result of incomplete modeling of the process and are spurious rather than substantive. In this report, we show that when the true relation between a dependent variable and age is non-linear (e.g. quadratic), but is modeled as linear, the estimated age effect will be a function of the age distribution. In a continuous-time idealization, if the age distribution is Gaussian, the estimated age effects agree. If the age distribution is symmetric and the non-linearity is quadratic, cross-sectional and longitudinal results agree. Otherwise they do not. We illustrate these points by analysis of the relation between aging and pulmonary function in middle and old age using data from a large, prospective, longitudinal study.
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000375:Aging; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D006801:Humans; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008168:Lung / Q000502:physiology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D012129:Respiratory Function Tests