Comparative study of electrophrenic nerve stimulation and mechanical ventilatory support in traumatic spinal cord injury.
Over the past two decades, the number of surviving apneic spinal cord injured patients has been increasing. Mechanical ventilation for home maintenance has been supplemented by electrophrenic respiration (EPR) since 1970. Nineteen patients who were totally mechanical ventilator dependent at discharge from rehabilitation in a spinal cord centre are compared with 18 patients discharged on EPR. There were more young males in the EPR group while the overall average ages were approximately the same. The mortality rates were approximately equal although the mechanical ventilator dependent patients expired earlier than the EPR group. Survivors on mechanical ventilation lived longer on an average and the vast majority of both groups were discharged to their home. There needs to be the establishment of a ventilatory dependent registry for spinal cord injury.
D000328:Adult; D004599:Electric Stimulation Therapy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010791:Phrenic Nerve / Q000502:physiology*; D012121:Respiration, Artificial; D012133:Respiratory Paralysis / Q000628:therapy*; D013119:Spinal Cord Injuries / Q000628:therapy*; D012122:Ventilators, Mechanical