Measuring genetic stability in bacteria of potential use in genetic engineering.
Four commonly used conjugation techniques, colony cross streak (CCS), broth mating (BM), combined spread plate (CSP), and membrane filtration (MF), were compared with each other regarding reliability, sensitivity, and complexity in evaluating the transfer of conjugative plasmids. Five plasmids representing several incompatibility groups plus a variety of laboratory and environmental isolates were used as mating pairs. The suitability of each method was evaluated for use in a routine assessment of the genetic stability of genetically engineered microorganisms. By the CSP and MF techniques with laboratory strains such as Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas species as recipients, transconjugants were usually produced in 100% of the mating trials. However, when environmental strains isolated from plants and soil were used as recipients, transconjugants were detected in 100% of some crosses and in as little as 30% in other crosses depending on the plasmid and recipient used. In general, differences in the percentage of successful matings between the CSP and MF techniques compared with the BM and CCS techniques were not statistically significant at the P less than or equal to 0.05 level. Occasionally, certain mating pairs consistently produced transconjugants by CCS or BM but not by CSP or MF. Since any single conjugation mating technique is not completely reliable in detecting transconjugants, we have developed a combined mating technique which integrates the CCS, CSP, BM, and MF methods as a single procedure to assess the mobility of plasmid DNA of genetically engineered microorganisms.
D003227:Conjugation, Genetic; D004269:DNA, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics; D004926:Escherichia coli / Q000235:genetics*; D005818:Genetic Engineering; D010957:Plasmids; D011549:Pseudomonas / Q000235:genetics*
D004269:DNA, Bacterial