Does the in situ technique for autologous vein femoropopliteal bypass offer any hemodynamic advantage?
The improved patency rates that have been claimed for in situ femoropopliteal vein bypass have been attributed to improved hemodynamics because of the natural taper of the vein and maintenance of wall compliance because of preservation of the nutrient vasa vasorum. Blood flow in 31 in situ and 21 reversed vein grafts was measured noninvasively with a duplex ultrasound scanner at a median of 6 months after operation. There was no significant difference in the resting or hyperemic flows between the two groups (p much greater than 0.1). The compliance of 15 undisturbed and 15 fully mobilized in situ vein grafts was measured noninvasively by Doppler ultrasonography immediately after operation and at 3 months. There was a significant fall in compliance in both groups (p less than 0.001) but no significant difference between them (p much greater than 0.1). We have been unable to demonstrate any significant hemodynamic advantage with the in situ technique but believe that its use is still justified because of technically easier anastomoses and an improved utilization rate. Preservation of the vasa vasorum does not maintain wall compliance and complete mobilization of the vein relieves any uneven tension and ensures that all venous tributaries are ligated, removing the risk of arteriovenous fistulas.
D003187:Compliance; D005260:Female; D005263:Femoral Artery / Q000502:physiology / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008722:Methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D011150:Popliteal Artery / Q000502:physiology / Q000601:surgery*; D012039:Regional Blood Flow; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012501:Saphenous Vein / Q000502:physiology / Q000637:transplantation*; D014463:Ultrasonography; D014651:Vasa Vasorum