title: Mill and the right to remain uninformed.
abstract: In a recent article in the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, David Ost (1984) claims that patients do not have a right to waive their right to information. He argues that patients cannot make informed rational decisions without full information and thus, a right to waive information would involve a right to avoid one's responsibility to act as an autonomous moral agent. In support of his position, Ost cites a passage from Mill. Yet, a correct interpretation of the passage in question would support one's right to remain uninformed in certain situations. If the information would hurt one's chances for survival or hurt one's ability to make calm, rational decisions, then one not only does not have a duty to find out the information, but one's exercising one's right to remain uninformed may be the only rational course of action to take.
mesh_terms: D026689:Ethical Analysis; D004989:Ethics / Q000266:history; D004992:Ethics, Medical / Q000266:history; D049672:History, 19th Century; D007258:Informed Consent; D028681:Moral Obligations; D026706:Paternalism; D010344:Patient Advocacy; D010358:Patient Participation; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010684:Philosophy / Q000266:history; D012941:Social Responsibility; D014342:Truth Disclosure; D014481:United States