title: Light scanning versus mammography in breast cancer detection.
abstract: Transillumination light scanning of the breast was compared with screen-film mammography in a prospective study of 1,110 women referred to an outpatient imaging department. Each method was interpreted independently of the other but with knowledge of physical examination findings. Of 24 biopsy-proved cancers, 14 (58%) were detected with light scanning and 21 (88%) with mammography. The 77 false-positive light scan examinations were attributed to technical factors and the inability of light scanning to distinguish malignant from benign conditions on the basis of imaging features. Of the ten false-negative light scan examinations, two were retrospectively reclassified as positive, but light scans in the other eight cases remained normal in appearance. The authors conclude that transillumination light scanning is not competitive with mammography as a screening method for breast cancer detection. furthermore, they were unable to identify a select subpopulation of women who might benefit from light scanning as an adjunct to mammography.
mesh_terms: D001706:Biopsy; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology / Q000517:prevention & control; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008327:Mammography; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods; D010808:Physical Examination; D011446:Prospective Studies; D014172:Transillumination