The role of visual reafferents during a pointing movement: comparative study between open-loop and closed-loop performances in monkeys before and after unilateral electrolytic lesion of the substantia nigra.
In order to elucidate the compensatory role of visual feedback during movement, two experiments were designed to compare the motor performances of Papio papio baboons depending on whether the animals were able to visually control the limb trajectory (visual closed-loop condition) or not (visual open-loop condition). The visuomotor task used consisted of making trained pointing movements towards a stationary target. In experiment A, the baboons were successively presented with these two experimental conditions. The abolition of visual control was found to cause no change in either reaction time (RT) or movement time (MT), but brought about extensive pointing errors. It was also associated with a conspicuous increase in the mean velocity and the mean length of the trajectories. In experiment B, two groups of baboons were used. The monkeys in the first group were required to perform under closed loop conditions. The second group performed the pointing movement under open loop conditions. Once criterion was reached by each animal, a unilateral electrolytic lesion of the substantia nigra (SN) was performed. A comparison between the post operative performances of the animals in the two groups showed that suppression of visual cues resulted in a lengthening of the RT and a slowing of the movement speed. Moreover when visual feedback was lacking, the amplitude of the movement decreased and the finger fell short of the target. During the last post operative period, suppression of visual feedback brought about a more rapid return of RTs to their preoperative level and a more durable slowing of movement speed than with normal vision. The discussion deals with the role of visual feed-back in the control of movement preparation and execution, and with the change in mode of motor control caused by lesion of the SN. Partial exclusion of the SN might bring about a shift from the feedforward to a feedback mode relying more heavily on visual cues.
D000818:Animals; D003463:Cues; D005246:Feedback; D005552:Forelimb; D007699:Kinesthesis / Q000502:physiology; D009068:Movement; D010215:Papio; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time; D013378:Substantia Nigra / Q000502:physiology*; D014785:Vision, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*