Does transducer selection affect aortic arch velocities?
The hypothesis tested was that transducers of different types and shapes would produce different peak and mean ascending aortic (AAo) velocities. Additionally, we sought to determine if mean and peak velocity recorded from the descending aorta (DAo) were similar to velocities in the AAo. Twenty-eight consecutive individuals who had normal hearts were studied. AAo velocities were measured with four transducers including a nonimaging device that transmitted Doppler at right angles to the transducer handle, a 30-degree angled continuous wave transducer, an imaging transducer that transmitted Doppler in line with the transducer handle, and a second imaging transducer that sectored at 25 degrees to the transducer handle. DAo was studied with a standard in-line imaging transducer. Results showed that mean and peak AAo velocities recorded by transducers that transmitted off the axis of the transducer handle were similar, but the transducer that imaged along the transducer handle axis produced significantly lower peak and mean velocities. The problem that caused lower velocity for the on-axis transducer was inability to image the area immediately posterior to the sternum to permit alignment in the azimuthal dimension. The continuous wave transducer provided a wide spectral dispersion. Mean DAo velocity was similar to mean AAo velocity, but variability was large.
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001011:Aorta / Q000502:physiology; D001013:Aorta, Thoracic / Q000502:physiology*; D001783:Blood Flow Velocity; D002302:Cardiac Output; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D014159:Transducers; D014463:Ultrasonography / Q000379:methods*