Soft and hard hemodiafiltration (HDF).
Soft and Hard Hemodiafiltration (HDF). A 32-month study was made to assess efficiency and clinical tolerance in a comparison between "soft" and "hard" HDF. Soft HDF was performed in 18 patients using a polyacrylonitrile AN 69 S 1.2m2 membrane and hard HDF in 12 patients using a polyacrylonitrile hollow-fibre 1.8m2 membrane. Different technical parameters were used for each of the two methods. Biochemical data registered during a single session showed the efficiency of both kinds of treatment and in this study clinical tolerance and patient well-being were significantly better than with hemodialysis. Hard HDF permits considerable shortening of treatment time.
D000180:Acrylic Resins; D001639:Bicarbonates; D001769:Blood; D001783:Blood Flow Velocity; D003404:Creatinine; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D008567:Membranes, Artificial; D010710:Phosphates; D006435:Renal Dialysis / Q000379:methods*; D013499:Surface Properties; D014462:Ultrafiltration / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D014508:Urea
D000180:Acrylic Resins; D001639:Bicarbonates; D008567:Membranes, Artificial; D010710:Phosphates; C010504:polyacrylonitrile; D014508:Urea; D003404:Creatinine