Screening for diabetic retinopathy--comparison of a nurse and a doctor with retinal photography.
The efficacy of diabetic retinal screening by a nurse trained in ophthalmoscopy and of a diabetologist was assessed by comparison with fundal photography. The study was performed in 282 subjects, 59 with known diabetes and 223 participating in a screening survey, of whom 13 had diabetes and 43 impaired glucose tolerance. The prevalence of retinopathy in the diabetic subjects was 36.8% and serious retinopathy 9.5% while in the screened subjects it was 3.5% and 0.9% respectively. The characteristics of nurse examination as a test to detect retinopathy was: sensitivity 50.0% +/- CL16.8%, specificity 99.2% +/- CL0.9%, which compared with 51.3% +/- CL15.7% and 98.7% +/- CL1.2% for the doctor. The nurse failed to detect serious retinopathy as accurately as the doctor, although new vessels were missed in 5 of 6 cases by the doctor. Screening for retinopathy requires either ophthalmoscopy by an observer trained to a higher level than is common in doctors, or non-mydriatic retinal photography.
D000328:Adult; D003930:Diabetic Retinopathy / Q000473:pathology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D006801:Humans; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods*; D009726:Nurses; D010781:Photography; D010820:Physicians; D012160:Retina / Q000473:pathology