title: Relative potency of chemical carcinogens in rodents.
abstract: Extensive carcinogenesis data compiled by Gold et al. for 770 compounds tested in 2944 chronic bioassays in animals provided an opportunity to compare cancer rates across animal species for a wide variety of compounds administered by various routes of exposure. The comparisons in this paper are restricted to the most frequently tested species: rats, mice, and hamsters. When sufficient experimental data exist, Gold et al. provide estimates of the TD50 (the chronic dose rate expressed in mg/kg body weight/day which halves the actuarially adjusted percentage of tumor-free animals at the end of a standard lifetime experiment). Since the current practice generally is to base risk assessments upon the data set producing the highest cancer risk, the ratio of the minimum TD50's provides a measure of the relative potency between two species for each compound administered to animals by the same route. The geometric means of the ratios of minimum TD50's for rats:mice are 1/2.2 and 1/1.3 for diet and gavage, respectively. A mean ratio for rats: mice of 1/1.48 is obtained for compounds administered in the diet when the tumor site is the liver for both species. In general the minimum TD50 is lowest for the rat and highest for the hamster. Although limited data are available for inhalation studies, this route of administration resulted in the poorest agreement between rats and mice. In general, comparisons of minimum TD50's across the three rodent species are generally within a factor of 100 for a wide variety of compounds.
mesh_terms: D000280:Administration, Inhalation; D000284:Administration, Oral; D000818:Animals; D002273:Carcinogens / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000633:toxicity*; D006224:Cricetinae; D007274:Injections, Intraperitoneal; D051379:Mice; D051381:Rats; D012306:Risk; D013045:Species Specificity
chemical_list: D002273:Carcinogens