title: Surgical wound infections documented after hospital discharge.
abstract: Shorter lengths of hospitalization may result in more surgical wound infections being documented after hospital discharge. The current investigation analyzed 1644 surgical procedures performed over a 3-month period, and documented surgical wound infections both before and for 1 month after hospital discharge. Physician and patient questionnaires were used. One hundred eight infections were noted, of which 50 (46%) were seen after hospital discharge by either the patient or the surgeon. Rates of infection were 5.2%, 7.5%, and 7.5% for clean, clean-contaminated, and contaminated-dirty categories, respectively. Had postdischarge surveillance not been used, rates would have appeared to be 2.5%, 6.5%, and 6.8% for the same surgical classes. Infections following clean and clean-contaminated procedures were more likely to be noticed after hospital discharge. Excluding those that were patient-documented, wound infection rates would have been 4.2% (clean), 6.3% (clean-contaminated) and 6.8% (contaminated-dirty). Postdischarge surveillance is imperative to meaningfully document true rates of surgical wound infection, inasmuch as increasing numbers are likely to occur only after patients leave the hospital.
mesh_terms: D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006746:Hospital Bed Capacity, 500 and over; D006801:Humans; D008404:Massachusetts; D010351:Patient Discharge; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection / Q000453:epidemiology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires