title: Prediction of "critical" coronary disease: are the "Consensus Conference" guidelines adequate?
abstract: Presenting features of 100 patients with significant left main coronary stenosis (LMCS) were reviewed. All presented with angina--on minimal exertion in 45, moderate exertion in 38, and severe exertion in 6--and 11 had unstable angina. Although the resting ECG was normal in 44, exercise testing was positive in 92% of patients tested. The authors conclude that symptoms and the resting ECG alone are unhelpful in predicting "critical" coronary disease. However, application of a management plan similar to that suggested by the Consensus Conference on coronary artery surgery would have selected the vast majority of such patients for angiography.
authors: University Department of Medical Cardiology, Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, Scotland.
authors: S J
authors: SJ
authors: Hutchison
authors: M W
authors: MW
authors: Millar-Craig
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000787:Angina Pectoris / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D003245:Consensus Statements as Topic; D017023:Coronary Angiography; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D003331:Coronary Vessels / Q000473:pathology; D004562:Electrocardiography; D005080:Exercise Test; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged