title: Teaching reasoning.
abstract: Twentieth-century psychologists have been pessimistic about teaching reasoning, prevailing opinion suggesting that people may possess only domain-specific rules, rather than abstract rules; this would mean that training a rule in one domain would not produce generalization to other domains. Alternatively, it was thought that people might possess abstract rules (such as logical ones) but that these are induced developmentally through self-discovery methods and cannot be trained. Research suggests a much more optimistic view: even brief formal training in inferential rules may enhance their use for reasoning about everyday life events. Previous theorists may have been mistaken about trainability, in part because they misidentified the kind of rules that people use naturally.
authors: University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48106.
authors: R E
authors: RE
authors: Nisbett
authors: G T
authors: GT
authors: Fong
authors: D R
authors: DR
authors: Lehman
authors: P W
authors: PW
authors: Cheng
mesh_terms: D004493:Education; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008128:Logic; D013223:Statistics as Topic