Controlling relations in conditional discrimination and matching by exclusion.
Normally capable adults learned two-choice identity matching of three-digit numerals and arbitrary matching of physically dissimilar nonsense syllables. The stimuli were displayed on a computer terminal, and responses consisted of typing on the terminal's keyboard. In Experiment 1, every trial displayed a sample numeral, a comparison numeral, and three equal signs (= = =). The comparison stimulus was to be selected if it was identical with the sample; otherwise the equal sign was to be selected. This "single comparison" method was then used to show that arbitrary matching could be based upon either sample-S+ or sample-S- relations. In Experiment 2, a series of probe trials displayed a novel sample, a comparison stimulus from the arbitrary matching baseline, and = = =. Subjects typically selected = = =; they apparently were excluding the baseline comparison stimulus. Experiments 3 through 5 investigated which variables in training would lead to the selection of baseline comparison stimuli in response to novel samples. Behavior was usually unchanged when baseline training included relating comparison stimuli to as many as four different samples. Punishment contingencies were effective, but performance did not generalize unless those contingencies were applied in relation to more than one baseline comparison stimulus.
McIlvane
W J
WJ
Behavioral Neurology Department, E. K. Shriver Center, Waltham, Massachusetts 02254.
Kledaras
J B
JB
Munson
L C
LC
King
K A
KA
de Rose
J C
JC
Stoddard
L T
LT
D003463:Cues; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005793:Generalization, Psychological; D006801:Humans; D011678:Punishment; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology