Was Sherrington right about co-contractions?
Differences in electromyographic (EMG) activity between brief isometric maximum voluntary contractions under conditions of agonist contraction and agonist-antagonist co-contractions were assessed for elbow flexors (biceps brachii) and elbow extensors (triceps, long head). Expressing maximum EMG co-contraction activity as a ratio of agonist maximum EMG activity of the same muscle yielded EMG ratios consistently below 1.0 (mean = 0.48 for flexion and 0.76 for extension). Flexor EMG ratios did not co-vary with elbow position but extensor EMG ratios approached 1.0 or sometimes greater at shorter muscle lengths (elbow extension). Findings were in general accord with Sherrington's original proposal of 'double reciprocal innervation'. Neural circuitry designed to limit full muscle activation during co-contractions may serve to protect the joint against excessive tangential or compressive forces.
Tyler
A E
AE
Hutton
R S
RS
D000328:Adult; D001132:Arm; D001676:Biofeedback, Psychology; D004576:Electromyography; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007537:Isometric Contraction; D008297:Male; D009119:Muscle Contraction; D009132:Muscles / Q000294:innervation*; D009433:Neural Inhibition; D012018:Reflex / Q000502:physiology