Magnetic resonance imaging of extremity masses.
Twenty-seven adults with extremity masses were examined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In 26/27 cases, computed tomography (CT) scans were available for comparison. Imaging with multiple pulse sequences is necessary to optimize diagnosis by MRI. Advantages of MRI include direct sagittal and coronal imaging, demonstration of vessels without contrast and superior soft tissue contrast. CT better demonstrates cortical destruction and small calcifications, which may be important in some cases. For noncalcified masses without bone involvement, MRI is equivalent or superior to CT. In those cases with calcification or bone involvement, MRI plays a role complementary to CT.
Cory
D A
DA
Ellis
J H
JH
Bies
J R
JR
Klatte
E C
EC
Colyer
R A
RA
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001132:Arm; D001859:Bone Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007866:Leg; D009682:Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009132:Muscles / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D012983:Soft Tissue Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed