[Use of partially hydrolyzed and untreated straw meal in the feeding of breeding sows. 3. Nutrient digestibility, feed passage time and mineral balance with the addition of variously treated straw materials compared to concentrate feeding alone].
In studies with 16 breeding sows of the country species the feed value of straw materials and their fitness for use were ascertained in a long-term experiment. On the feeding basis of a concentrate ration (IV) untreated (I), HCl treated (II = HCl treatment without steaming) and partly hydrolysed straw meal (III = HCl treatment with subsequent steaming) were tested. In the course of the experiment and at a nutrient level of 1 (maintenance requirement), the digestibility of the organic matter of the ration and that of some major and trace elements, N and mineral balances as well as feed passage rate and water excretion in faeces were ascertained at selected measuring times. The following mean results were achieved: The integration of all straw materials tested lead to a significant reduction of the digestibility of the organic matter of the total ration, the least negative effect was caused by partly hydrolysed straw meal (III). The fractions crude protein, crude fibre and N-free extracts were mainly affected. Straw meal integration had a gravidity-conditioned influence on the daily N balance. Increased N excretion in faeces could only be compensated by non-pregnant animals by a decreased N excretion in urine. The mineral balance (Ca, P, Na, Cu and Mn) remained largely uninfluenced by the straw supplement. The feed passage rate was reduced by the use of all straw meal variants to ca. 50% of the value measured after the sole feeding of concentrate (IV). Feed passage rate and water excretion in faeces were approximately reciprocal. The digestibility of the organic matter of the straw materials ascertained according to the difference method amounted to 7.4 (I), 18.1 (II) and 27.9% (III); that of the N-free extracts in the same sequence to 10.0, 22.0 and 34.9%. The calculated energetic feed value was for I = 70.7, for II = 154.9 and for III = 240.7 EFUpig/kg DM.
D000821:Animal Feed / Q000032:analysis; D000818:Animals; D001947:Breeding; D004063:Digestion; D004734:Energy Metabolism; D005243:Feces / Q000032:analysis; D005260:Female; D005527:Food, Fortified / Q000032:analysis; D006868:Hydrolysis; D009584:Nitrogen / Q000032:analysis; D011247:Pregnancy; D013227:Steam; D013552:Swine / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors; D014131:Trace Elements / Q000378:metabolism*; D014556:Urine / Q000032:analysis
D013227:Steam; D014131:Trace Elements; D009584:Nitrogen
Untersuchungen zum Einsatz von teilhydrolysiertem und unbehandeltem Strohmehl in der Fütterung von Zuchtsauen. 3. Mitteilung. Nährstoffverdaulichkeit, Futterdurchgangszeit und Mineralstoffbilanz bei Zusatz verschieden behandelter Strohmaterialien im Vergleich zur alleinigen Konzentratfütterung.