Comparison of function two years after revision of failed total hip arthroplasty and primary hip arthroplasty.
Because of the known high complication rate, it is important for both the patient and physician to know as much as possible about the outcome of revision operations for loosened total hip arthroplasties. This study evaluates the changes in subjective ratings and objective kinesiologic measurements from before revision operations through two years after revision operations. The object is to compare these measurements with the measurements of a group of patients with primary replacements. Both groups of patients showed significant improvement in most parameters from before to after surgery. These parameters included walking performance, hip muscle strength, range of motion, forces applied to canes, and the amount of weight borne on the operated limb during quiet standing. Compared to the control group with primary replacements, the group with revision used more assistive devices, had less pain relief, walked slower, had less hip motion, and had more lateral lurch. While results after revision surgery were not as gratifying as those after primary hip replacement, patients requiring revision can still anticipate substantial improvement.
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002183:Canes; D003446:Crutches; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005684:Gait; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006622:Hip Prosthesis / Q000009:adverse effects*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009068:Movement; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D012086:Reoperation; D013997:Time Factors