A comparative study of the impact of education vs. process groups for families of patients with affective disorders.
This clinical project compares the relative impact of two types of multiple family groups on psychiatric inpatients and their families. Forty patients with a diagnosis of affective disorder, and their family members, were randomly assigned to a traditional multiple family group with a process orientation that emphasized support, destigmatization, and self-help about common problems; or to a psychoeducational multiple family group that emphasized the provision of information about the patient's illness and methods of coping with it effectively. Both groups, which met for four hours on a Saturday afternoon, were an integral part of an ongoing inpatient program specializing in the treatment of affective disorders. Pre- and post-measures were obtained regarding family and patient knowledge about affective disorders, level of personal distress, attitudes about the illness, and dyadic adjustment. In addition, both patients and family members were asked to rate their satisfaction with the group experience. A number of differences in knowledge, attitude and dyadic adjustment were found in the participants of both groups immediately following their respective group sessions, but there were only a few statistically significant differences between the two groups. Those who attended the psychoeducational session, however, reported significantly more satisfaction with the experience.
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001294:Attitude to Health; D005190:Family; D005196:Family Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006266:Health Education; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008393:Marriage; D008875:Middle Aged; D019964:Mood Disorders / Q000628:therapy*; D011368:Professional-Family Relations; D011615:Psychotherapy, Group / Q000379:methods*; D012917:Social Adjustment