title: Total hip replacement comparison between the McKee-Farrar and Charnley prostheses in a 5-year follow-up study.
abstract: In a prospective study, 177 patients who underwent total hip replacement by the McKee-Farrar or Charnley techniques were followed up for 5 years with yearly clinical examinations, walking tests, and X-rays. The findings concerning pain, walking ability, and complications were satisfactory and similar to the inventors' own 5-year results. Comparison between the two techniques disclosed no major differences. Over 90% of the patients were free from pain; the infection rate was 3.4% and the loosening rate 6%. A walking test showed marked increase in speed over the first few years and a slight decrease after the third year. Our findings do not support the hypothesis that the metal-on-metal prosthesis is clinically inferior to the metal-on-polyethylene prosthesis.
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001424:Bacterial Infections / Q000209:etiology; D001835:Body Weight; D003258:Consumer Behavior; D005260:Female; D006622:Hip Prosthesis / Q000009:adverse effects; D006801:Humans; D007870:Leg Length Inequality / Q000209:etiology; D008124:Locomotion; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009068:Movement; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D013923:Thromboembolism / Q000209:etiology