title: [Results of in vitro chemosensitivity assays: human tumor clonogenic and scintillation assay].
abstract: The authors reviewed their experiences to date with chemosensitivity testing of 629 tumors by human tumor clonogenic assay (HTCA) and of 199 tumors by scintillation assay (SA). HTCA and SA were both performed using a double-layer-soft-agar system with continuous exposure of cells to one concentration of standard anticancer drugs. Overall, 60% of specimens in HTCA and 58% in SA produced significant growth in vitro. HTCA was 52% (13/25) reliable for predicting in vivo sensitivity, and 95% (36/38) reliable for in vivo resistance, whereas SA was 40% (8/20) reliable for in vivo sensitivity and 88% (21/24) for in vivo resistance. The current results indicate that there is no particular difference in the success rate and in the predictive accuracy for in vivo sensitivity and resistance between HTCA and SA. Therefore, it is doubtful whether only clonogenic tumor cells among whole tumor cell populations should be selected in assessing the chemosensitivities of human tumors. In vitro success rates were variable, depending on the tumor histology. In vitro growth of gastric cancer specimens was characteristically lower than that of colon cancer specimens (48% and 60% in HTCA, and 46% and 68% in SA, respectively). (p less than 0.005). Optimal in vitro-in vivo drug concentrations and culture conditions are still being defined. Correlation studies of in vitro-in vivo responses of gastrointestinal cancers suggested that in vitro concentrations of 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C used in this study were considerably higher than their optimal doses. Tumor cell heterogeneity poses significant problems in the clinical use of chemosensitivity assays. The question arises as to whether a single biopsy specimen is representative of a patient's disease. In this last study, we sought evidence of tumor heterogeneity by comparing chemosensitivity responses between: 1) different portions of a single tumor, 2) a primary and a metastatic biopsy taken from a patient on the same day, and 3) different metastases from a patient taken on the same day. The results demonstrated the presence of considerable heterogeneity of response to chemotherapy among different tumors from the same patient, and even within the same tumor. The reported discrepancies of in vitro and in vivo sensitivity may be due to such therapeutic heterogeneity among tumors.
mesh_terms: D000970:Antineoplastic Agents / Q000494:pharmacology*; D003114:Colony-Forming Units Assay; D004273:DNA, Neoplasm / Q000096:biosynthesis*; D004353:Drug Evaluation, Preclinical / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000378:metabolism / Q000473:pathology; D012588:Scintillation Counting; D014316:Tritium; D014410:Tumor Stem Cell Assay
chemical_list: D000970:Antineoplastic Agents; D004273:DNA, Neoplasm; D014316:Tritium