My body, my property.
Two recent cases raise the question: Should the body be considered a form of property? Patients generally do not share in the profits derived from the applications of research on their body parts and products. Nor is their consent for research required so long as the body part is unidentified and is removed in the course of treatment. A market in body parts and products would require consent to all categories of research and ensure that patients are protected from coercion and given the chance to be paid fairly for their contributions. Such a market might force us to rethink our policies prohibiting organ sales. Donors, recipients, and society will benefit from a market in body parts so long as owners--and no one else--retain control over their bodies.
D035843:Biomedical Research; D030881:Disclosure; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D018594:Human Body; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D038622:Internationality; D018587:Oocyte Donation; D010344:Patient Advocacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D028701:Patient Rights; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012926:Social Control, Formal; D013094:Spermatozoa; D014019:Tissue Donors; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D014481:United States