Functional results after experimental reinnervation of the posterior cricoarytenoid muscle in dogs.
The purpose of the present investigation was to test and compare three different types of experimental posterior cricoarytenoid (PCA) muscle reinnervation. Dogs were subjected to reinnervation by the recurrent nerve itself (self-reinnervation) (n = 6), by the ansa cervicalis nerve (n = 5) or by the phrenic nerve (n = 5). In all but three of the self-reinnervation cases the adductor branch of the nerve was cut and ligated. Three to seven months postoperatively--depending upon the experimental approach--the animals were anesthetized and the function of the vocal cords was tested, visually evaluated and photographed. In the self--reinnervated larynges there were no observable movements on the reinnervated side during quiet inspiration, while during forced inspiration there were small but inconsistent movements. In the larynges reinnervated by the ansa cervicalis nerve no movements could be observed on the reinnervated side during either quiet or forced respiration. In four out of five larynges reinnervated by the phrenic nerve there were larger excursions on the reinnervated side as compared to the normal side during quiet respiration. During forced inspiration the excursions increased on both sides, but relatively more on the normal side. In all experiments indirect electrical stimulation gave large excursions on the experimental side indicating successful reinnervation. It is concluded that the phrenic nerve appears to be the best alternative if reinnervation of the PCA muscle in paralyzed larynges is attempted.
D000818:Animals; D004285:Dogs; D007821:Laryngeal Muscles / Q000294:innervation*; D008722:Methods; D009132:Muscles / Q000294:innervation*; D010791:Phrenic Nerve / Q000601:surgery; D012009:Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve / Q000601:surgery; D014827:Vocal Cords / Q000294:innervation / Q000503:physiopathology