Haemodialysis-induced activation of complement. Effects of different membranes.
The ability of cellulose-based (Cuprophan, saponified cellulose ester) and synthetic (polyacrylonitrile, polycarbonate, polymethylmethacrylate) haemodialysis membranes to activate complement during treatment was compared, using functional, immunochemical, radioimmunoassays, and fast centrifugal analysis assay techniques. Cellulosic and synthetic membranes show a striking similarity in their complement activation when measured by immunochemical assays. Functional haemolytic assays for alternate pathway and CH50 demonstrate no significant differences from predialysis values. C3d levels were also unable to demonstrate differences between the membranes. C3a levels, on the other hand, demonstrated significant differences between cuprophan, polyacrylonitrile, and polymethylmethacrylate but not between Cuprophan and polycarbonate membranes. Since comparable alternate-pathway activity of both cellulosic and synthetic membranes was demonstrated, but their C3a release differed, it is possible that certain surfaces that activate complement also possess the ability to absorb components of the alternate pathway.
D000180:Acrylic Resins; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002482:Cellulose; D003167:Complement Activation; D006801:Humans; D007676:Kidney Failure, Chronic / Q000276:immunology / Q000628:therapy; D007688:Kidneys, Artificial; D008297:Male; D008567:Membranes, Artificial; D008768:Methylmethacrylates; D008875:Middle Aged; D011076:Polycarboxylate Cement; D006435:Renal Dialysis / Q000009:adverse effects*
D000180:Acrylic Resins; D008567:Membranes, Artificial; D008768:Methylmethacrylates; D011076:Polycarboxylate Cement; C010504:polyacrylonitrile; C005506:polycarbonate; D002482:Cellulose