Diagnostic accuracy of double-contrast enema and rectosigmoidoscopy in connection with faecal occult blood testing for the detection of rectosigmoid neoplasms.
Four hundred and fifty-eight consecutive subjects with a positive faecal guaiac test when screened for early detection of colorectal neoplasms were investigated with double-contrast enemas and rectosigmoidoscopy (60 cm). The results of these two methods were compared. The radiologists and endoscopists were unaware of the result of each others' examination at the time of their own investigation. Altogether ten subjects with carcinoma in the rectosigmoid area were found. The radiologists and endoscopists each overlooked four of these ten carcinomas and only four of the carcinomas were diagnosed with both methods. Fifty-six of one hundred and seven adenomas were 1 cm or larger in diameter and located in the rectum or the sigmoid colon. Thirteen of the fifty-six adenomas were missed by double contrast enema and ten by endoscopy and only thirty-three adenomas were diagnosed with both methods. Neoplasms in the rectum and the sigmoid colon are sometimes difficult to diagnose with both radiology and endoscopy. Rectosigmoidoscopy (60 cm) should therefore be used as a complement to double contrast enemas if this method is chosen for investigation of a patient with rectal bleeding.
D000236:Adenoma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D001466:Barium Sulfate; D002277:Carcinoma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D004724:Endoscopy; D004733:Enema; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D009780:Occult Blood; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011859:Radiography; D012004:Rectal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D012811:Sigmoid Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging
D001466:Barium Sulfate