The influence of alcohol on the outcome of automated static perimetry.
It is well known that perimetric findings fluctuate within a single examination. There is additional fluctuation between perimetric examinations. The cause of this fluctuation is not yet fully understood, but such things as changes in attention, patient cooperation, or drugs have been discussed. To study such possible factors, we carried out perimetry on subjects who had consumed alcohol and who had not. The results indicate that alcohol, at a blood concentration of approximately 0.08%, barely influences the results of static automated perimetry. Differential light sensitivity remained unchanged by alcohol at all eccentricities tested. A decrease in the ability to cooperate was manifested by a significant higher score of false-positives in catch trials. There was also a tendency toward an increase in false-negative responses in catch trials, an increase in the number of stimuli presentations required, and higher short-term fluctuation. Lack of the influence of alcohol on the differential light threshold does not necessarily mean that alcohol has no influence on visual function. It indicates, however, that differential light sensitivity, as measured with the automated perimeter Octopus, is not influenced by moderate alcohol ingestion.
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D000431:Ethanol / Q000097:blood / Q000494:pharmacology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D058609:Visual Field Tests / Q000379:methods*; D014794:Visual Fields / Q000187:drug effects*
D000431:Ethanol